No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
The death of Karl Barth on the 10th December 1968 removed from the theological scene one of the greatest thinkers of the Church. Professor T. F. Torrance in an appreciation of him says that he was ‘God's greatest gift to theological science in the whole of the modern era’.
page 320 note 1 Scottish Journal of Theology, March 1969.
page 320 note 2 Natural Theology, 1946, E.T. p. 74.
page 320 note 3 ibid.
page 321 note 1 op. cit., p. 28.
page 321 note 2 C.D. II/I, pp. 11ff, cf. I/II, pp. 3O4ff.
page 321 note 3 Evangelical Theology, p. 109.
page 321 note 4 See Camfield's, F. W. excellent exposition of Barth's thought here in Reformation Old and New (1947), p. 23.Google Scholar
page 322 note 1 C.D. II/I, p. 243.
page 322 note 2 ibid., pp. 79ff.
page 322 note 3 IV/I, p. 81.
page 322 note 4 II/I, p. 188.
page 322 note 5 Theologische Fragen und Antworten (Zurich, 1957), p. 70.
page 322 note 6 Torrance, T. F., Karl Barth: An Introduction to His Early Theology 1910–1931 (1962), p. 156Google Scholar. Cf. Evangelical Theology, where Barth points out that ‘Israel’ means not a contender for God, but against God (p. 24).
page 323 note 1 God Here and Now (1964), p. 40.
page 323 note 2 Barth, Karl, Anselm: Fides Quaerens Intellectum (1931).Google Scholar
page 323 note 3 C.D. I/I, p. 7.
page 324 note 1 C.D. IV/III, p. 882.
page 324 note 2 ibid., p. 848.
page 324 note 3 ibid., III/I, p. 184.
page 324 note 4 ibid., II/I, p. 243.
page 324 note 5 ibid., I/I, pp. 268ff.
page 325 note 1 See Brown, J., Kierkegaard, Heidegger, Buber and Barth (1962), p. 136.Google Scholar
page 325 note 2 C.D. I/I, p. 214f.
page 325 note 3 See Urban, Linwood, ‘Barth's Epistemology’ in Faith and the Philosophers, ed. Hick, J. (1964), pp. 218ff.Google Scholar
page 326 note 1 C.D. IV/III, p. 117.
page 326 note 2 ibid., p. 123.
page 327 note 1 C.D. III/II.
page 327 note 2 Darslellung undDeutung seiner Theologie (1951), p. 251f.Google Scholar
page 327 note 3 An Introduction to Barth's Dogmatics for Preachers (1963), p. 140.Google Scholar
page 327 note 4 ibid., p. 140–1.
page 328 note 1 The Expository Times, May 1966.
page 328 note 2 p. 60.
page 329 note 1 Faith and Philosophy, p. 209.
page 329 note 2 C.D. II/II, pp. 136, 148–50.
page 330 note 1 Lewis, H. D., Philosophy of Religion, p. 231.Google Scholar
page 330 note 2 Fides Quaerens Intellectum (1913), E. T. by I. W. Robertson.
page 330 note 3 ‘Sens et nature de l'argument de saint Anselme’, Archives d'histore doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age, IX, 1934.
page 330 note 4 Barth, Karl, Part 2, Parole de Dieu et existence humaine (1957).Google Scholar
page 330 note 5 Contra Gaunilonem, ch. 8.
page 330 note 6 ibid., pp. 162–3.
page 331 note 1 ibid., p. 162.
page 331 note 2 Karl Barth's Theological Method (1963), p. 66.Google Scholar
page 332 note 1 Philosophy of Religion (1965), p. 230.
page 333 note 1 Richmond, op. cit., p. 147.
page 333 note 2 Twentieth Century Religious Thought, p. 334.
page 334 note 1 His renewed interest in Schleiermacher in theology and Mozart in music. Also his coming to grips with philosophy and science as we have seen.
page 335 note 1 Jenkin's, DavidGuide to the Debate about God (1966), p. 80.Google Scholar
page 335 note 2 ibid., p. 110.
page 336 note 1 The Sense of the Presence of God (1962), p. 255.Google Scholar