Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:35:50.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lost in translation: rethinking words about women in 1–2 Timothy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2021

Fergus J. King  and
Dorothy A. Lee
Fergus J. King*
Affiliation:
Trinity College Theological School and the University of Divinity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Dorothy A. Lee
Affiliation:
Trinity College Theological School and the University of Divinity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

St Paul and the tradition which follows in his wake have often fallen victim to the circumstances and ideologies of their interpreters: used as ambassadors for patriarchy by some and rejected as misogynistic by others. This article reviews some of the contentious passages in 1 and 2 Timothy and concludes that they both challenge the mores of their environment and resonate with other (deutero-)Pauline teachings. To ensure that such claims do not fall prey to circularity in their arguments, a methodology is developed and applied in which claims of resonance are not predicated on the content of other writings.

Keywords

‘the Childbirth’comparative interpretive methodology1 and 2 Timothywidowswomen teaching
Type
Research Article
Information
Scottish Journal of Theology , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 52 - 66
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Richards, E. Randolph and O'Brien, Brandon J., Paul Behaving Badly: Was the Apostle a Racist, Chauvinist Jerk? (Downers Grove IL: InterVarsity Press, 2016), p. 15Google Scholar.

2 Twomey, Jay, The Pastoral Epistles through the Centuries. Blackwell Bible Commentaries (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009), p. 8Google Scholar.

3 Armstrong, Karen, St Paul: The Apostle We Love to Hate (Boston and New York: New Harvest and Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2015), pp. 14–15Google Scholar.

4 Talbert, Charles H., Ephesians and Colossians (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2007), pp. 7–9Google Scholar.

5 Stettler, Hanna, ‘An Interpretation of Colossians 1:24 in the Framework of Paul's Mission Theology’, in Adna, Jostein and Kvalbein, Hans (eds), Mission of the Early Church to Jews and Gentiles (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000), p. 192Google Scholar.

6 For more detailed accounts of canonical criticism, see Sanders, James A., Canon and Community: A Guide to Canonical Criticism (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1984)Google Scholar; Wall, Robert W. and Lemcio, Eugene E., The New Testament as Canon: A Reader in Canonical Criticism (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1992)Google Scholar.

7 Smith, Jonathan Z., Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), 112–13Google Scholar.

8 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986), 32e, p. 67Google Scholar.

9 Hunter, J. F. M., Understanding Wittgenstein: Studies of Philosophical Investigations, (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1985), p. 59Google Scholar.

10 Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, 32e, p. 67. Cf. Aydan Turanli, ‘Wittgenstein on Myth, Ritual and Science’ at http://wab.uib.no/agora/tools/alws/collection-1-issue-1-article-68.annotate; accessed 31 Oct. 2019.

11 Ibid.

12 Schottroff, Luise, Lydia's Impatient Sisters: A Feminist Social History of Early Christianity (Louisville, KY; Westminster John Knox Press, 1995), p. 5Google Scholar.

13 Jeon, Paul S., 1 Timothy: A Charge to God's Missional Household, vol. 1 (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2017), p. 195Google Scholar.

14 Rubinstein, Marv, 21st Century American English Compendium: A Portable Guide to the Idiosyncracies, Subtleties, Technical Jargon, and Conventional Wisdom of American English, 3rd edn (Rockville, MD: Schreiber, 2006), pp. 42–3Google Scholar.

15 Barnes, Nathan J., Reading 1 Corinthians with Philosophically Educated Women (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2014), pp. 65–120Google Scholar.

16 Oden, Thomas C., First and Second Timothy and Titus (Louisville, KY: John Knox Press, 1989), p. 97Google Scholar.

17 Ibid.

18 Belleville, Linda et al. , Cornerstone Biblical Commentary: 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus, Hebrews (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 2009), pp. 56–62Google Scholar; Héring, Jean, The First Epistle of St Paul to the Corinthians, trans. Heathcote, A. W. and Allcock, P. J. (London: Epworth Press, 1962), pp. 154–5Google Scholar; Thiselton, Anthony, The First Epistle to the Corinthians (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2000), p. 1156Google Scholar.

19 Smith, Drudgery Divine, p. 112.

20 Westfall, Cynthia Long, Paul and Gender: Reclaiming the Apostle's Vision for Men and Women in Christ (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2016), pp. 290–1, n. 32Google Scholar.

21 Ibid., p. 292.

22 Respectively, Harlow, Mary, ‘Roman Society’, in Bispham, Edward (ed.), Roman Europe (Oxford: OUP, 2008), p. 115Google Scholar; Hallett, Judith P., Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society: Women and the Elite Family (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984), p. 235CrossRefGoogle Scholar. However, actual demographics reveal complex data; see Roger S. Bagnall and Bruce W. Frier, who note a mean gap of 7.5 years in their The Demography of Roman Egypt (Cambridge: CUP, 1994), pp. 118–21.

23 F. Blass and A Debrunner, A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, trans. and ed. Robert W. Funk (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961), §§390, 442[9]; Gordon D. Fee, ‘The Cultural Context of Ephesians 5:18–6:9’, Priscilla Papers 16 (2002), pp. 5–7.

24 Kevin Giles, What the Bible Actually Teaches on Women (Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2018), pp. 122–5, 144–51.

25 Westfall, Paul and Gender, p. 294, n. 41.

26 S. E. Hylen, A Modest Apostle: Thecla and the History of Women in the Early Church. (Oxford: OUP, 2015), pp. 73–81.

27 Jerome H. Neyrey, Honor and Shame in the Gospel of Matthew (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1998), p. 16.

28 Stephan Joubert, ‘Homo Reciprocus No More: The “Missional” Nature of Faith in James’, in Jacobus Kok, Tobias Nicklas, Dieter T. Roth and Christopher M. Hays (eds), Sensitivity towards Outsiders: Exploring the Dynamic Relationship between Mission and Ethics in the New Testament and Early Christianity (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), pp. 382–400.

29 Bernardo Cho, ‘Subverting Slavery: Philemon, Onesimus, and Paul's Gospel of Reconciliation’, Evangelical Quarterly 86/2 (2014), pp. 99–115.

30 Jack Barentsen, Emerging Leadership in the Pauline Mission: A Social Identity Perspective on Local Leadership Development in Corinth and Ephesus (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2011), p. 201; Jeon, 1 Timothy, p. 19; Paul Trebilco, The Early Christians in Ephesus (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2007), p. 206.

31 Michael Immendörfer, Ephesians and Artemis: The Cult of the Great Goddess as the Epistle's Context (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017).

32 Bruce J. Malina and John J. Pilch, Social-Science Commentary on the Book of Acts (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2008), p. 140.

33 S. M. Baugh, ‘Cult Prostitution in Ephesus: A Reappraisal’, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 42/4 (1999), pp. 456–7.

34 R. Strelan, Paul, Artemis, and the Jews in Ephesus (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1996), p. 66.

35 G. M. Rogers, The Mysteries of Artemis of Ephesos: Cult, Polis, and Change in the Graeco-Roman World (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012), p. 425, n. 66.

36 Linda L. Belleville, ‘Exegetical Fallacies in Interpreting 1 Timothy 2:11–15’, Priscilla Papers 17 (2003), pp. 2, 8–9.

37 Oden, First and Second, p. 99.

38 Gary W. Demarest, 1 & 2 Thessalonians/1 & 2 Timothy/Titus, vols. 31–2 of The Preachers Commentary (Nashville, TN: Nelson, 1984), p. 182.

39 Ibid., pp. 181–3; Oden, First and Second, pp. 99–102. This typological interpretation also had its supporters in pre-critical interpreters like Theophylact (c.1055–1107), Amelia Lanyerr (1569–1645) and Dorothy Leigh (d. 1616). For Theophylact, see Philip Barton Payne, Man and Woman, One in Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Paul's Letters (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2009), p. 131; for Lanyerr and Leigh, see Victoria Brownlee, ‘Literal and Spiritual Births: Mary as Mother in Seventeenth-Century Women's Writing’, Renaissance Quarterly 68/4 (2015), pp. 1297–1326.

40 Schotroff, Lydia's Impatient Sisters, p. 239, n. 34.

41 Heather Celoria, ‘Does 1 Timothy 2 Prohibit Women from Teaching, Leading, and Speaking in the Church?’, Priscilla Papers 27/3 (2013), pp. 21–2; Emilia Nihinlola, ‘Saved through Childbearing: An African Feminist Interpretation’, Evangelical Review of Theology 40/4 (2016), pp. 314–26.

42 Westfall, Paul and Gender, pp. 238–40.

43 Hylen, A Modest Apostle, pp. 7–42.

44 Lynn H. Cohick, Women in the World of the Earliest Christians: Illuminating Ancient Ways of Life (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2009), pp. 225–56.

45 Barnes, Reading, pp. 37–64.

46 Hendrik H. J. Brouwer, Bona Dea: The Sources and Description of the Cult (Leiden: Brill, 1989), pp. 37–8, 346, 377.

47 Elizabeth A. McCabe, An Examination of the Isis Cult with Preliminary Exploration into New Testament Studies (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2008), p. 100.

48 Schottroff, Lydia's Impatient Sisters, pp. 73, 239, n. 35.

49 Peter Cotterell and Max Turner, Linguistics and Biblical Interpretation (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1989) pp. 112–13; Stephen Shead, Radical Frame Semantics and Biblical Hebrew: Exploring Lexical Semantics (Leiden: Brill, 2011), pp. 30–1.

50 Dennis Ronald MacDonald, The Legend and the Apostle: The Battle for Paul in Story and Canon (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1983), p. 14.

51 Jan N. Bremmer, ‘No Country for Old Women’, in Jan N. Bremmer, The World of Greek Religion and Mythology: Collected Essays (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019), pp. 241, 249.

52 Suzanne Saïd, Homer and the Odyssey (Oxford: OUP, 2011), p. 160.

53 Euripides, Wise Melanippe, F 484, cited in Bremmer, ‘No Country’, pp. 249–50.

54 Smith, Drudgery Divine, pp. 113–14.

55 Huebner, Sabine R., The Family in Roman Egypt: A Comparative Approach to Intergenerational Solidarity and Conflict (Cambridge: CUP, 2013), pp. 97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Dibelius, Martin and Conzelmann, Hans, The Pastoral Epistles (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1972), pp. 73–4Google Scholar.

57 Winter, Bruce W., Roman Wives, Roman Widows: The Appearance of New Women and the Pauline Communities (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2003), pp. 132–3Google Scholar.

58 Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew, Houses and Society in Pompeii and Herculaneum (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), p. 12Google Scholar.

59 Weisberg, Dvora E., Levirate Marriage and the Family in Ancient Judaism (Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press, 2009), p. 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Scroggs, Robin, The Text and the Times: New Testament Essays for Today (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1993), p. 79Google Scholar.

61 Oden, First and Second, pp. 77–8.

62 Hare, Douglas R. A., Matthew (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2009), p. 176Google Scholar. Contra, Wilson, Stephen G., The Gentiles and Gentile Mission in Luke-Acts (Cambridge: CUP, 1973), p. 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Barth, Karl, ‘Rudolf Bultmann: An Attempt to Understand Him’, in Bartsch, H. W. and Fuller, R. H. (eds.), Kerygma and Myth (London: SPCK, 1972), pp. 83–102Google Scholar; Bultmann, Rudolf, ‘Is Exegesis without Presuppositions Possible?’, in Bartsch, H. W. and Fuller, R. H. (eds), Kerygma and Myth (London: SPCK, 1972), pp. 145–53Google Scholar.

64 For a detailed overview, see King, Fergus J., ‘More than a Vapid Sound: The Case for a Hermeneutic of Resonance’, Journal for Theology in Southern Africa 148 (2014), pp. 83–98Google Scholar.

65 Scroggs, Text and Times, p. 218.

66 Scroggs, Text and Times, p. 81.