Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T09:35:29.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why and How: Reflections in an Autobiographical Key

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2013

Daniel J. Kevles
Daniel J. Kevles*
Affiliation:
Yale University E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

My first book, The Physicists, was conceived when I. I. Rabi visited Princeton in 1961–1962 as a Shreve Fellow in the History Department (see Kevles 1995). Some two years earlier C. P. Snow had published his influential provocation, The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, and the academic world was abuzz with initiatives aimed at achieving better literacy in science among liberal arts majors. Rabi was a Nobel laureate in physics at Columbia University and his visit was one of Princeton's efforts to this end. It had been arranged by my mentor, Eric F. Goldman, a historian of modern America who had gotten to know Rabi through their mutual engagement with current issues in American democracy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 26 , Issue 4: Approaches, Styles, and Narratives: Reflections on Doing History of Science , December 2013 , pp. 627 - 638
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ben-David, Joseph. 1971. The Scientist's Role in Society: A Comparative Study. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Cole, Jonathan R., and Cole, Stephen. 1973. Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Forman, Paul, Heilbron, John, and Weart, Spencer R.. 1975. Physics circa 1900: Personnel, Funding, and Productivity of the Academic Establishments. Princeton: Princeton University Press ( = vol. 5 of Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences).Google Scholar
Kevles, Daniel J. 1968. “Testing the Army's Intelligence: Psychologists and the Military in World War I.” Journal of American History 50:565–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevles, Daniel J. 1980. “Genetics in the United States and Britain, 1890–1930: A Review with Speculations.” Isis 71:441–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kevles, Daniel J. 1985. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Kevles, Daniel J. 1995. The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kevles, Daniel J. 1998. The Baltimore Case: A Trial of Politics, Science, and Character. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Kohlstedt, Sally Gregory. 1976. The Formation of the American Scientific Community: The American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1848–1860. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern,” Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Pauline, Smith, Merritt Roe, Keyssar, Alexander, and Kevles, Daniel J.. [2003] 2006. Inventing America: A History of the United States, 2nd edition. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert King. 1966. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, edited by Storer, Norman W.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Price, Don K. 1965. The Scientific Estate. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roll-Hansen, Nils. 2005. The Lysenko Effect: The Politics of Science. Amherst NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Harriet. 1977. Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar