Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:32:54.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Science and the Kuzari

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Y. Tzvi Langermann
Y. Tzvi Langermann
Affiliation:
Department of Arabic, Bar-Ilan University, Institute of Microfilmed Hebrew Manuscripts, Jerusalem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Yehuda Halevi's Kuzari was written in response to the challenge posed to Judaism by a highly spiritual, nondenominational philosophy. Science, especially that embodied in the Hellenistic heritage, was a major component of philosophy; thus, if for no other reason than to make Judaism a serious competitor, Halevi had to show that the Jewish tradition as well possessed a body of scientific knowledge. The superiority of the Jewish teachings was demonstrated chiefly by appeal to the criteria of tradition, consensus, and authority, which, in Halevi's judgement, were in practice the criteria most influential in deciding scientific opinion. Despite the rather unique setting for the book, and the wide range of stances Halevi develops, the Kuzari was rather quickly and smoothly absorbed into the mainstream of Jewish religious thought.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1997 , pp. 495 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, A. 1944. “The Climatological Factor in Yehuda Halevi's Theory of Prophecy” (Hebrew), Melilah 1:1–17.Google Scholar
Baneth, D. H. 1957. “Some Remarks on the Autographs of Yehuda Halevi and the Genesis of the Kuzari” (Hebrew), Tarbiz 26:297–303.Google Scholar
Baron, S. W. 1941. “Yehudah Hallevi: An Answer to an Historic Challenge”, Jewish Social Studies 3:243–72.Google Scholar
Bos, G. 1995. Ibn al-Jazzār on Forgetfulness and Its Treatment. London: Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Comes, M. 1992 1993 1994. “The ‘Meridian of Water’ in the Tables of Geographical Coordinates of al-Andalus and North Africa,” Journal for the History of Arabic Science 10:41‐51.Google Scholar
Davidson, H. A. 1987. Proofs for Eternity, Creation, and the Existence of God in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ed. see Yehudah, Halevi 1977.Google Scholar
Fierro, M. 1996. “Bāţinism in al-Andalus. Maslama b. Qāsim al-Qurţubī (d.353/964), author of Rutbat al-Hakīm and the Ghāyat al-Hakīm (Picatrix),”Studio Islamica 84: 87–112.Google Scholar
Fleischer, E. 1994. “Yehuda Halevi — Remarks Concerning His Life and Poetical Oeuvre” (Hebrew), Israel Levin Jubilee Volume, Studies in Hebrew Literature I.Tel Aviv: University of Tel Aviv.Google Scholar
Goitein, S. D. 1988. A Mediterranean Society, vol.5, The Individual: Portrait of a Mediterranean Personality of the High Middle Ages as Reflected in the Cairoh Genizah. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Guttmann, J. 1973. Philosophies of Judaism: A History of Jewish Philosophy from Biblical Times to Franz Rosenzweig. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. 1986. “The Spiritual Guide,” in Classical Mediterranean Spirituality, edited by Armstrong, A.H, 436–59.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Yehuda, Halevi 1977. Kitāb al-Radd wa'l-Dalīl fīl-Dīn al-Dhalīl (Kitāb al-Khazarī), edited by Baneth, David H, prepared for publication by Haggai Ben-Shammai.Jerusalem: The Magnes Press and The Israel Academy of Arts and Sciences.(Referred to as Ed.)Google Scholar
Yehuda, Halevi 1840. Sefer ha-Kuzari bi-hamishah ma'marim, im shnei be'urim mefursamim, Kol Yehudah ve-Osar Nehmad. Warsaw: I. Goldman (reprinted Israel, 1959).Google Scholar
Husik, I. A History of Mediaeval Jewish Philosophy New York: Atheneum(reprint).Google Scholar
Jospe, R. 1990. “Early Philosophical Commentaries on the Sefer Yesira: Some Comments,” Revue des études juives 149:369–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasher, M. M. 1977. The Jewish Date Line (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Beth Torah Shelemah.Google Scholar
Kreisel, H. 1991. “Yehuda Halevi's Influence on Maimonides: A PreliminaryAppraisal,” Maimonidean Studies 2:95–121.Google Scholar
Landauer, S. 1875. “Die Psychologic des Ibn Sînâ,” Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft 29:335–418.Google Scholar
Langermann, Y. T. 1991. “Maimonides' Repudiation of Astrology,” Maimonidean Studies 2:123–58.Google Scholar
Langermann, Y. T. 1992. “Acceptance and Devaluation: Nahmanides' Attitude towards Science,” Jewish Thought and Philosophy 1:223–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langermann, Y. T. 1993. “Some Astrological Themes in the Thought of Abraham ibn Ezra,“ in Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra: Studies in the Writings of a Twelfth- Century Jewish Polymath, edited by Isadore, Twersky and Harris, Jay M., 28–85. Cambridge, Mass, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Langermann, Y. T. 1992–1993. “A New Codex of Medieval Jewish Philosophy” (Hebrew). Kiryat Sefer 64:1427–32.Google Scholar
Langermann, Y. T. 1996. Yemenite Midrash: Philosophical Commentaries on the Torah. NewYork:Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Lasker, D. J. 1989. “Yehuda Halevi and Karaism,” in From Ancient Israel to Modern Judaism: Intellect in Quest of Understanding. Essays in Honor of Marvin Fox, vol. 3, edited by Jacob, Neusner, Frerichs, Ernest S., and Sarna, Nahum M., 111–25. Atlanta: Brown.Google Scholar
Lasker, D. J. 1992. “Karaism in Twelfth-Century Spain,“Jewish Thought and Philosophy 21:179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maimonides, Moses. 1963. The Guide of the Perplexed, translated by Shlomo, Pines, 2 vols. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Perlman, M. 1971. Ibn Kammūna's Examination of the Inquiries into the Three Faiths. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pines, S. 1958. “Fragments of the Arabic Original of Fans Vitae in Moses Ibn Ezra's Work ‘Arugat Habbosem’” (Hebrew), Tarbiz 27:218–33.Google Scholar
Pines, S. 1980. “Shi'ite Terms and Conceptions in Yehuda Halevi's Kuzari,” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 2:165–251.Google Scholar
Pines, S. 1988.“On the term Ruhanniyot and its origin and place in Yehuda Halevi's Doctrine” (Hebrew), Tarbiz 57:511–40.Google Scholar
Silman, Y. 1995.Philosopher and Prophet: Yehuda Halevi, the Kuzari and the Evolution of His Thought Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sklare, D. 1996. Samuel ben Hofni Gaon and His Cultural World. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirat, C. 1985.A History of Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Cambridge, Mass, and Paris: Cambridge University Press and Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. 1943. “The Law of Reason in the Kuzari,” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 13:47–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twersky, I. 1993. “Did R. Abraham Ibn Ezra Influence Maimonides?“ (Hebrew), in Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra: Studies in the Writings of a Twelfth-Century Jewish Polymath, op. cit, 21–48.Google Scholar
Wolfson, H. A. 1977. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Religion, vol.2. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar