Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T23:16:25.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nature of Emergency: The Great Kanto Earthquake and the Crisis of Reason in Late Imperial Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2012

Minami Orihara  and
Gregory Clancey
Minami Orihara
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia (UBC) E-mail: oriharam@interchange.ubc.ca
Gregory Clancey
Affiliation:
Asia Research Institute (ARI), National University of Singapore (NUS) E-mail: hisgkc@nus.edu.sg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

Hijōji (emergency) was an important keyword in the militarist Japan of the 1930s. Previous scholarship has assumed that such language sprung from the global financial crisis of 1929, and subsequent diplomatic events. Our article demonstrates, however, that a full-bodied language of emergency was crafted well before the collapse of the global economy, and against the backdrop of the Great Kanto Earthquake of 1923, which destroyed the Japanese capital. While previous “great earthquakes” had been opportunities to strengthen Japanese participation in the global project of science, this one led more dramatically to a crisis of reason, and indirectly contributed to the spiritual, anti-western, and anti-rational rhetoric of what became the “Showa Restoration.” This and other post-disaster landscapes, we argue, should be examined as compelling sites for the crafting of political language – sites of opportunity and meaning as well as trial. While the phrase “state of emergency” was coined under very different circumstances in post-war Britain, it gained power and charisma in Japan, and likely other places around the world, by its association with natural catastrophe. Thus did modern politics establish a new connection with the traditional realm of the sublime, and in the case of Japan, the supernatural. Emergency's ability to associate politics with nature would never disappear, and has perhaps even strengthened in the early twenty-first century.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 25 , Issue 1: Witness to Disaster: Earthquakes and Expertise in Comparative Perspective , March 2012 , pp. 103 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agamben, Georgio. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ryūnosuke, Akutagawa. 1978. “Daishinsai ni saiseru kansō” [Comments on the Great Earthquake]. In Akutagawa Ryūnosuke zenshū [Collected Works of Akutagawa Ryūnosuke], vol. 6. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar
de Bary, Theodore. 2001. Sources of Japanese Tradition, vol 1. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Borland, Janet. 2005. “Stories of Ideal Japanese Subjects from the Great Kanto Earthquake of 1923.” Japanese Studies 25:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borland, Janet. 2006. “Capitalizing on Catastrophe: Reinvigorating the Japanese State with Moral Values through Education Following the 1923 Great Kanto Earthquake.” Modern Asian Studies 40 (4):875–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancey, Gregory. 2004. “Toward a Spatial History of Emergency: Notes from Singapore.” In Beyond Description: Singapore, Space, Historicity, edited by Bishop, Ryan, Phillips, John, and Wei, Yeo Wei, 30–69New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clancey, Gregory. 2006a. Earthquake Nation: The Cultural Politics of Japanese Seismicity, 1868–1930. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clancey, Gregory. 2006b. “The Meiji Earthquake: Nature, Nation, and the Ambiguities of Catastrophe.” Modern Asian Studies 40 (4):909–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
kai, Dai nihon yūben. 1923. Taisho daishinsai daikasai [The Great Earthquake and the Great Fire of Taisho]. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Katsumi, Fukaya. 1986. Hyakushō ikki no rekishi teki kōzō [Historical Structure of Peasant Uprisings]. Tokyo: Azekura shobō.Google Scholar
Miyatarō, Fukuda. 1923. “Kaigenka ni okeru kokumin to guntai to gojin shōrai no kakugo” [Nation and Military under the Martial Law and Our Preparations for the Future]. In Taisho daishinsai daikasai [The Great Earthquake and the Great Fire of Taisho], edited by kai, Dai nihon yūben, 270–274. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Noboru, Haga. 1973. Hyakushō ikki [Peasant Uprisings]. Tokyo: Ushio shuppansha.Google Scholar
Arata, Hori. 2004. “Kanto daishinsai to tenken ron: Shibusawa Eiichi o chūshin ni” [The Great Kanto Earthquake and Retribution Theory: With a Focus on Shibusawa Eiichi]. In Kyōdō kenkyū rekishi to bungaku, geijutsu: kanto daishinsai [Collaborative Research on History, Literature and Art: The Great Kanto Earthquake], 129–157. Tokyo: Risōsha.Google Scholar
Tatsurō, Inagaki. 1982. “Kanto daishinkasai to bundan” [The Great Kanto Earthquake and the Literary World]. In Inagaki Tatsurō gakugei bunshū [Literary Works of Inagaki Tatsurō], vol. 3, 419–430. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō.Google Scholar
Kanji, Ishiwara. 1976. Ishiwara Kanji zenshū [Collected Works of Ishiwara Kanji], vol. 1, edited by Kanji zenshū kankōkai, Ishiwara. Tokyo: Ishiwara Kanji zenshū kankōkai.Google Scholar
Kanji, Ishiwara. 1977. Ishiwara Kanji zenshū [Collected Works of Ishiwara Kanji], vol. 7, edited by Kanji zenshū kankōkai, Ishiwara. Tokyo: Ishiwara Kanji zenshū kankōkai.Google Scholar
Kanji, Ishiwara. 1985. Ishiwara Kanji senshū [Selected Works of Ishiwara Kanji], vol. 2, edited by Reiichirō, Tamai. Tokyo: Tamairabo shuppan.Google Scholar
Ikki, Kita. 1959. Kita Ikki chosaku shū [Collected Works of Kita Ikki], vol. 2. Tokyo: Misuzu shobō.Google Scholar
Rohan, Kōda. 1923. “Jo” [Prologue]. In Taisho daishinsai daikasai [The Great Earthquake and the Great Fire of Taisho], edited by kai, Dai nihon yūben, prologue. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
hakubutsukan, Koga rekishi, eds. 2000. Tenpenchii to seikimatsu [Natural Disasters and the End of the World]. Tokyo: Koga rekishi hakubutsukan.Google Scholar
Kokuryūkai. 1923. Tokyo daijishinki [Records of the Tokyo Great Earthquake]. Osaka: Chūshinkaku shobō.Google Scholar
Akira, Koshizawa. 2005. Fukkō keikaku [Plans of Recovery]. Tokyo: Chūōkōron shinsha.Google Scholar
Sendō, Kurita. 1924. “Seishin fukkō no sakebi” [Cries for Spiritual Revival]. In 11 ji 58 ppun [11:58am], edited by Tokyo City, 311–334. Tokyo: Shiseidō shoten.Google Scholar
Heizō, Mamiya. 1924. “Shizen kakumei to shinshakai no kensetsu” [Nature's Revolution and Construction of New Society]. In 11 ji 58 ppun [11:58am], edited by Tokyo City, 381–387. Tokyo: Shiseidō shoten.Google Scholar
Marra, Michele. 1988a. “The Development of Mappō Thought in Japan (1).” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 15 (1):25–54.Google Scholar
Marra, Michele. 1988b. “The Development of Mappō Thought in Japan (2)” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 15 (4):287–305.Google Scholar
Ken'ichi, Matsumoto. 1987. Kita Ikki: reikoku nikki [Kita Ikki: Diaries of Prophesies]. Tokyo: Daisan bunmeisha.Google Scholar
Shōichi, Matsuo. 2003. Kanto daishinsai to kaigenrei [The Great Kanto Earthquake and Martial Law]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa kōbunkan.Google Scholar
Shōichi, Matsuo, Yoneko, Ōtake, and Chieko, Hirakata, eds. 1997. Kanto daishinsai seifu rikugun kankei shiryō: seifu, kaigenrei kankei shiryō [The Government, Navy and Army Documents of the Great Kanto Earthquake: The Documents on Government and Martial Law], vol. 1. Tokyo: Nihon keizai hyōronsha.Google Scholar
Mikio, Matsuoka. 2005. Nichiren bukkyō no shakai shisōteki tenkai [Social and Intellectual Developments of Nichiren Buddhism]. Tokyo: Tokyo daigaku shuppankai.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. 1998. “The Dilemmas of Dictatorship: Carl Schmitt and Constitutional Emergency Powers.” In Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism, edited by Dyzenhaus, David, 217–51. Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sanji, Mikami. 1923. “Jo” [Prologue]. In Taisho daishinsai daikasai [The Great Earthquake and the Great Fire of Taisho], edited by kai, Dai nihon yūben, prologue. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Hiroshi, Minami. 1965. Taisho bunka [Taisho Culture]. Tokyo: Keisō shobō.Google Scholar
Ministry of Army. 1935. Hijōji to kokubō [Emergency and National Defense]. Tokyo: Ministry of the Army Press.Google Scholar
Tatsukichi, Minobe. 1923. “Shinsai ni yoru kaigenrei no shikō” [The Enforcement of Martial Law after the Earthquake]. In Fukkō sōsho [Collected Works on the Revival], 1–17. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar
Yūjirō, Miyake. 1923. “Jo” [Prologue]. In Taisho daishinsai daikasai [The Great Earthquake and the Great Fire of Taisho], edited by Kai, Dai nihon yūben, prologue. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Gaikotsu, Miyatake. 1923. Shinsai shohō [Sketches of the Earthquake], vol. 1. Tokyo: Hankyōdō.Google Scholar
Mullis, Christopher. 2008. “Shockwaves and Reverberations: The Great Kanto Earthquake of 1923 and the Japanese Diaspora in Hawaii and the Continental United States.” Ph.D. diss., University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Namiroku, Murakami. 1923. “Shinsaigo no kansō” [Impressions after the Earthquake]. In Taisho daishinsai daikasai [The Great Earthquake and the Great Fire of Taisho], edited by kai, Dai nihon yūben, 277–281. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Yōichirō, Nakajima. 1982. Kanto daishinsai [The Great Kanto Earthquake]. Tokyo: Yūzankaku.Google Scholar
Nichiren. 1986. Shugo kokka ron [Rectification for the Protection of the Nation]. In Nichiren, edited by Tamura, . Tokyo: Chikuma shobō.Google Scholar
Keigetsu, Ōmachi. 1923a. “Shinshi shokun o tomurau” [Grieving for the Dead]. In Taisho daishinsai daikasai [The Great Earthquake and the Great Fire of Taisho], edited by kai, Dai nihon yūben, 282–283. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Keigetsu, Ōmachi. 1923b. “Risai shokun o nagusamu” [Consoling the Sufferers]. In Taisho daishinsai daikasai [The Great Earthquake and the Great Fire of Taisho], edited by kai, Dai nihon yūben, 284–285. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Peattie, Mark R. 1975. Ishiwara Kanji and Japan's Confrontation with the West. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ramraj, Victor J., ed. 2008. Emergencies and the Limits of Legality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankei Newspapers. March 14-April 30, 2011.Google Scholar
Sasaki Junnosuke. 1969. Bakumatsu shakai ron [Discussions on Late-Edo Society] Tokyo: Hanawa shobō.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William E. 2000. “The Economic State of Emergency.” Cardoza Law Review 21:5–6.Google Scholar
Schencking, Charles J. 2006. “Catastrophe, Opportunism, Contestation: The Fractured Politics of Reconstructing Tokyo following the Great Kanto Earthquake.” Modern Asian Studies 40 (4):833–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiichi, Shibusawa. 1923. “Ichi kokumin to shite” [As a Citizen]. In Taisho daishinsai daikasai [The Great Earthquake and the Great Fire of Taisho], edited by kai, Dai nihon yūben, 275–276. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Kyōichi, Shirosaki. 1934. “Hijōji nihon kokuzei taikan” [Outlook on Emergency Japan]. In Hijōji kokumin zenshū: keizai hen [Collections for Emergency Nation: Economy], 269–277. Tokyo: Chūō kōronsha.Google Scholar
Smith, Kerry. 2006. “Imamura Akitsune and the Great Kanto Earthquake.” Unpublished paper delivered at the JSPS/CJS (The Joint Colloquium Held on Earthquakes in Japan), “Responses to Destruction in Japan.” University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Stone, Jacqueline. 2000. “Japanese Lotus Millennialism-From Militant Nationalism to Contemporary Peace Movements.” In Millennialism, Persecution, & Violence: Historical Cases, edited by Wessinger, Catherine, 261–280. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Takematsu, Takahashi. 1924. “Shinsai ni yoru watashi no zange to kakusei” [My Penitence and Awakening after the Earthquake]. In 11 ji 58 ppun [11:58am], edited by Tokyo City, 408–412. Tokyo: Shiseidō shoten.Google Scholar
Yoshirō, Tamura ed. 1986. Nichiren. Tokyo: Chikuma shobō.Google Scholar
Shigemoto, Tokoro. 1965. Nichiren no shisō to kamakura bukkyō [Philosophy of Nichiren and Kamakura Buddhism]. Tokyo: Fuzanbō.Google Scholar
Shigemoto, Tokoro. 1972. “Tero to Nichiren shugi no kankei: Kita Ikki, Ōkawa Shūmei, Inoue Nisshō” [The Connection between Terrorism and Nichirenism: Kita Ikki, Ōkawa Shūmei, Inoue Nisshō]. In Nihon kindai to Nichiren shugi [Modern Japan and Nichirenism], edited by Yoshirō, Tamura and Eishū, Miyazaki, 101–122. Tokyo: Shunjūsha.Google Scholar
Shunsuke, Tsurumi and Seiichi, Imai, et al. , eds. 1962. Shinsai ni yuragu: 1923–1931 [In the Wake of the Earthquake]. Tokyo: Chikuma shobō.Google Scholar
fukyūkai, Tsūzoku kyōiku. 1923. Daishinsai to sono kyōkun [The Great Earthquake and Its Moral Lessons]. Tokyo: Tsūzoku kyōiku fukyū kai shuppankyoku.Google Scholar
Kiyoshi, Wada. 1924. “Staato o aratani seyo” [Make a New Beginning]. In 11 ji 58 ppun [11:58am], edited by Tokyo City, 367–381. Tokyo: Shiseidō shoten.Google Scholar
Tetsurō, Watsuji. 1935. Fūdo [Climate]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar
Wilson, George. 1969. Radical Nationalist in Japan: Kita Ikki 1883–1937. Cambridge MA: Havard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, George. 1982. “Pursuing the Millennium in the Meiji Restoration.” In Conflict in Modern Japanese History: The Neglected Tradition, edited by Najita, Tetsuo and Koschmann, J. Victor, 177–194. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Sandra. 2002. The Manchurian Crisis and Japanese Society, 1931–33. London & New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yampolsky, Philip B., ed. 1990. Selected Writings of Nichiren, translated by Burton, Watson and others. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kendō, Yokoyama. 1923. “Nihon no jishinshi no taiyō” [The Outline of Earthquake History in Japan]. In Taisho daishinsai daikasai [The Great Earthquake and the Great Fire of Taisho], edited by kai, Dai nihon yūben, 255–268. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Mitsusada, Yoshikawa. 1949. Kanto daishinsai no chian kaiko [Memoirs of the Great Kanto Earthquake]. Tokyo: Hōmufu tokubetsu shinsakyoku.Google Scholar