Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T04:12:12.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Memoirs, Memory, and Historical Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Gabriel Motzkin
Affiliation:
History DepartmentThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Abstract

Against the idea that modern historiography developed in the eighteenth century as a completely new way of looking at the past, this paper argues that modern historical science borrowed its sense of experience from seventeenth-century memoirs. However, seventeenth-century rnemorialists made very different as sumptions than modern historians about the relations between time, memory, and history. One consequence of their introduction of lived subjectivity into the depiction of the past was a debate in early eighteenth-century France about the relations between history and fiction, some arguing that fiction is a better way of grasping the subjective truth of the past. These debates about the relations between history and memory and between history and fiction have resurfaced recently. The historical moods that are one context for paradigm shifts share common motifs, such as a sense of defeat, of distance between the present and the immediate past, and a need for consolation through the elaboration of a new mode of experiencing the past.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Démoris, René 1975. Le Roman à la première personne: Du classicisme aux Lumières. Paris: Armand Cohn.Google Scholar
Harth, Erica 1983.Ideology and Culture in Seventeenth-Century France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1979. Vergangene Zukunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Langer, Lawrence 1991. Holocaust Testimonies. The Ruins of Memory. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lenglet du Fresnoy, Nicolas. [1716] 1735. Méthode pour étudier l'histoire. Paris.Google Scholar
Motzkin, Gabriel. 1993. “Gedächtnis – Tradition – Geschichte. Zeitstrukturen im Katholizismusdes 19. Jarhunderts”. In Vergessen und Erinnern, edited by Haverkamp, Anselm and Lachmann, Renate, 305312. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Saint-Real, César Vichard de 1671. De l'usage de l'histoire. Paris:Google Scholar
Saint-Simon, Louis de 1983. Mémoires. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1952. Persecution and the Art of Writing. Chicago: The Free Press.Google Scholar