Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:20:43.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Levels of communication: The talking horse experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2022

Daniel Gethmann
Daniel Gethmann*
Affiliation:
Graz University of Technology Institute of Architectural Theory, History of Art and Cultural Studies Technikerstr. 4 A-8010 Graz Austria
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

In the early twentieth century, counting and speaking horses, like the famous Clever Hans or the “Horses of Elberfeld,” became widely debated subjects in experimental psychology. The idea was to determine whether their learning success was only a fraud, or if it might open up a new chapter in “animal psychology” - or even belong to the realm of parapsychology and telepathy. When their tricks were discovered, the teachers of the animals were marked as charlatans. Both the attempts to detect charlatans and the efforts to avoid this accusation during the talking horse experiments proceeded using the method of introducing new levels of communication into the human-animal interaction process in order to substantiate each respective standpoint. This paper argues that the scientific studies and debates on the talking horses are relevant not only from psychological, biological, and semiotic vantage points, but also from the perspective of communications theory, giving rise to the foundational issue of levels of communication.

Keywords

Karl KrallWarren WeaverCommunication theoryClever HansElberfeld Horses
Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 33 , Issue 4: Charlatans , December 2020 , pp. 473 - 490
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Translated by Dawn Michelle d’Atri

References

Abresch, Johannes. 1988. “Karl Krall und die Elberfelder Pferde.” Romerike Berge: Zeitschrift für das Bergische Land 38:1–7.Google Scholar
Asprem, Egil. 2010. “A Nice Arrangement of Heterodoxies: William McDougall and the Professionalization of Psychical Research.” Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences 46 (2):123–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Britt von den. 2008. Die “Neue Tierpsychologie” und ihre wissenschaftlichen Vertreter (von 1900 bis 1945). PhD diss., Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover. Bristol and Berlin: Tenea.Google Scholar
Christopher, Milbourne. 1970. ESP, Seers & Psychics. New York: Thomas Y. Cromwell Company.Google Scholar
Coburn, Charles A., and Robert M. Yerkes. 1915. “A Study of the Behavior of the Crow Corvus Americanus Aud. by the Multiple Choice Method.” Journal of Animal Behaviour 5:75–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crist, Eileen. 1997. “From Questions to Stimuli, from Answers to Reactions: The Case of Clever Hans.” Semiotica 113 (1-2):1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sio, Fabio, and Chantal, Marazia. 2014. “Clever Hans and His Effects: Karl Krall and the Origins of Experimental Parapsychology in Germany.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 48:94–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Despret, Vinciane. 2004. “The Body We Care for: Figures of Anthropo-zoo-genesis.” Body & Society 10 (2–3):111–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Despret, Vinciane. 2015. “Who Made Clever Hans Stupid?” Angelaki 20:77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettlinger, Max. 1913. Der Streit um die rechnenden Pferde . Lecture held on February 27, 1913, at the Psychologische Gesellschaft in Munich. Munich: Verlag Natur und Kultur.Google Scholar
Gundlach, Horst. 2006. “Carl Stumpf, Oskar Pfungst, der Kluge Hans und eine geglückte Vernebelungsaktion.” Psychologische Rundschau 57 (2):96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hediger, Heini K. P. 1981. “The Clever Hans Phenomenon from an Animal Psychologist’s Point of View.” In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 364, edited by Thomas A. Sebeok and Robert Rosenthal, 1–17. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, Otto. 1937. “Die ‘zählenden’ Tauben und die ‘zahlsprechenden’ Hunde.” Der Biologe 6 (1):13–24.Google Scholar
Köhler, Otto. 1941. “Vom Erlernen unbekannter Anzahlen bei Vögeln.” Die Naturwissenschaften: Organ der Gesellschaft deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte 29 (14–15):201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, Otto. 1943. “‘Zähl’-Versuche an einem Kolkraben und Vergleichsversuche an Menschen.” Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 5:575–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krall, Karl. 1912. Denkende Tiere: Beiträge zur Tierseelenkunde auf Grund eigener Versuche; Der kluge Hans und meine Pferde Muhamed und Zarif. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Krall, Karl. 1913. “Berto, das blinde rechnende Pferd.” Tierseele: Zeitschrift für vergleichende Seelenkunde 1 (1):10–14.Google Scholar
Krall, Karl. 1927. “Denkübertragung bei Mensch und Tier.” Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Tierpsychologie 1:15–21.Google Scholar
Lachapelle, Sofie, and Jenna, Healey. 2010. “On Hans, Zou and the Others: Wonder Animals and the Question of Animal Intelligence in Early Twentieth-Century France.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41:12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lashley, Karl Spencer 1949. “Persistent Problems in the Evolution of Mind.” The Quarterly Review of Biology 24 (1):28–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Máday, Stefan von. 1914. Gibt es denkende Tiere? Eine Entgegnung auf Kralls “Denkende Tiere.” Leipzig and Berlin: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Moll, Albert. 1904. “Mitteilung über den ‘klugen Hans.’” Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie, Pathologie und Hygiene 6:368–80.Google Scholar
Moynahan, Gregory B. 1999. “Ernst Cassirer, Theoretical Biology, and the Clever Hans Phenomenon.” Science in Context 12:549–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfungst, Oskar. 1907. Das Pferd des Herrn von Osten (Der kluge Hans): Ein Beitrag zur experimentellen Tier- und Menschen-Psychologie. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Pfungst, Oskar. [1907] 1911. Clever Hans (The Horse of Mr. von Osten): A Contribution to Experimental Animal and Human Psychology. Translated by Carl L. Rahn. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Report of September 12, 1904.” In Pfungst, Oskar. [1907] 1911. Clever Hans (The Horse of Mr. von Osten): A Contribution to Experimental Animal and Human Psychology. Translated by Carl L. Rahn, 253–54. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Rhine, Joseph Banks. 1934. Extra Sensory Perception. Boston: Boston Society for Psychic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhine, Joseph Banks, and Rhine, Louisa Ella. 1929A. “An Investigation of a ‘Mind-Reading’ Horse.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 23 (4):449–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhine, Joseph Banks, and Rhine, Louisa Ella. 1929B. “Second Report on Lady, the ‘Mind-Reading’ Horse.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 24 (3):287–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Robert. 1965. “Introduction. Clever Hans: A Case Study of Scientific Method.” In Pfungst, Oskar. [1907] 1965. Clever Hans (The Horse of Mr. von Osten). Translated by Carl L. Rahn, edited by Robert Rosenthal, IX–XXXIV. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas Albert. 1981. “The Clever Hans Phenomenon: Communication with Horses, Whales, Apes, and People.” In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 364. Edited by Thomas, A. Sebeok and Rosenthal, Robert. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude E., and Weaver, Warren. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sommer, Andreas. 2012. “Policing Epistemic Deviance: Albert von Schrenck-Notzing and Albert Moll.” Medical History 56:255–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stumpf, Carl. [1907] 1911A. “The Report of December 9th, 1904.” In Pfungst, Oskar. [1907] 1911. Clever Hans (The Horse of Mr. von Osten): A Contribution to Experimental Animal and Human Psychology. Translated by Carl L. Rahn, 261–65. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Stumpf, Carl. [1907] 1911B. “Mr. von Osten’s Method of Instruction.” In Pfungst, Oskar. [1907] 1911. Clever Hans (The Horse of Mr. von Osten): A Contribution to Experimental Animal and Human Psychology. Translated by Carl L. Rahn, 245–52. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Stumpf, Carl. [1907] 1911C. “Introduction.” In Pfungst, Oskar. [1907] 1911. Clever Hans (The Horse of Mr. von Osten): A Contribution to Experimental Animal and Human Psychology. Translated by Carl L. Rahn, 5–14. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Truitt, Jim. 1952. “Talking Horse Writes Her Own Headline.” Life Magazine 33 (25):20–21.Google Scholar
Weaver, Warren. 1949. “Recent Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Communication.” In The Mathematical Theory of Communication, edited by Claude, E. Shannon, and Weaver, Warren, 1–28. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, Warren. 1963. Lady Luck: The Theory of Probability. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Wolffram, Heather. 2009. The Stepchildren of Science: Psychical Research and Parapsychology in Germany, 1870–1939. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar