Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:46:41.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individuals and collectives in the philosophy of Boris Hessen: An introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2022

Sean Winkler
Sean Winkler*
Affiliation:
Loyola Marymount University and University of Redlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

This paper provides an introduction to three translations of articles by Soviet philosopher Boris Hessen: “Mechanical Materialism and Modern Physics,” “On Comrade Timiryazev’s Attitude towards Contemporary Science” and “Marian Smoluchowski (On the Tenth Anniversary of His Death)”. It begins by presenting a central tension in Hessen’s work; namely, how even though he is better known for the externalism of his 1931 Newton paper, much of his work has been considered exemplary of an internalist approach. I then show that for Hessen, the history of modern science was defined by the discovery of the dialectical unity in opposition between dynamic and statistical regularity. This not only sheds important light on Hessen’s understanding of causation, but also reconciles the aforementioned tension by showing his approach to the relationship between individuals and collectives in the study of physical phenomena, along with the relationship between individual scientists and socioeconomic conditions.

Keywords

Boris HessenSoviet scienceindividualscollectivesdynamic regularitystatistical regularity
Type
Historical Document
Information
Science in Context , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 121 - 136
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The translations of Hessen’s texts following this introduction were carried out by Sean Winkler with the aid of translation software, and were later revised by Alexei Kojevnikov. Translations of these same texts have also appeared in Olga Pattison and Chris Talbot’s recent volume, Boris Hessen: Physics and Philosophy in the Soviet Union, 1927 – 1931. These translations are unrelated and were carried out independently of one another.

References

Bibliography

Avenarius, Richard. 1876. Prolegomena zu einer Kritik der reinen Erfahrung. Leipzig: Fues.Google Scholar
Avenarius, Richard. 1921. Kritik der Reinen Erfahrung, Bände 1–2. Leipzig: O.R. Reisland.Google Scholar
Bakhurst, David. 2018. “On Lenin’s Materialism and Empirio-Criticism.” Studies in East European Thought 70:107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blokhintsev, Dmitri. 1964. Quantum Mechanics. Translated by Sykes, John & Kearsley, M.J.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdanov, Alexander. 2020. Empiriomonism: Essays in Philosophy, Books 1–3. Edited and translated by David, G. Rowley. Leiden/Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, Niels. 1928. “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory.” Nature: 580–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilvers, Christopher. 2007. “The Tragedy of Comrade Hessen: Biography as Historical Discourse.” In The History and Poetics of Scientific Biography. Edited by Söderqvist, Thomas, 105–120. Burlington/Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Clausius, Rudolf. 1867. The Mechanical Theory of Heat, with Its Applications to the Steam-Engine and to the Physical Properties of Bodies. Edited and translated by Hirst, T.A.. London: John van Voorst.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hendrik Floris. 1994. The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1990. Puritanism and the Rise of Modern Science: The Merton Thesis. New Brunswick/London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Deborin, Abram. 1929. Hegel and Dialectical Materialism. Translator unknown. www.marxists.org (last accessed 4 March 2021).Google Scholar
Dietzgen, Joseph. 1906. Excursions of a Socialist in the Domain of Epistemology, in Some of the Philosophical Essays by Joseph Dietzgen. Translated by Beer, Max and Rothstein, Theodor. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. 1954. “The Mechanics of Newton and Their Influence on the Development of Theoretical Physics.” In Ideas and Opinions. Edited by Seeling, Carl et al. and translated by Bargmann, Sonja, 253–261. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. 2010a. Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. In Marx & Engels: Collected Works, vol. 24 – Marx & Engels, 1874–83. Edited by Kalinina, Yelena and Forgacs, David, et al., 281–385. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. 2010b. Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy. In Marx & Engels: Collected Works, vol. 26 – Engels 1882–89. Edited by Tartakovsky, Boris, et al. and translated by Jacbos, Nicholas, 353–398. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gideon. 2005. “The Hessen-Grossmann Thesis: An Attempt at Rehabilitation.” Perspectives on Science (15) 2: 166–193.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gideon and McLaughlin, Peter. 2009a. “Classical Marxist Historiography of Science: The Hessen-Grossmann-Thesis.” In The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann. Edited by Freudenthal, Gideon and McLaughlin, Peter, 1–40. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, Gideon and McLaughlin, Peter. 2009b. “Boris Hessen: In Lieu of a Biography.” In The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann. Edited by Freudenthal, Gideon and McLaughlin, Peter, 253–256. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorelik, Gennady and Bouis, Antonina W.. 2005. The World of Andrei Sakharov: A Russian Physicist’s Path to Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Loren R. 1985. “The Socio-Political Roots of Boris Hessen: Soviet Marxism and the History of Science.” Social Studies of Science 15:705–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Loren R. 1987. Science, Philosophy, and Human Behavior in the Soviet Union. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hedeler, Wladislaw. 2018. “Lenin and Stalin, Theory and Politics.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Leninist Political Philosophy. Edited by Rockmore, Tom and Levine, Norman, 257–280. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessen, Boris. 2009. “The Social and Economic Roots of Newton’s Principia.” In The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann. Edited by Freudenthal, Gideon and McLaughlin, Peter and translated by Schimrat, Philippa, 41–101. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessen, Boris. 2019. “Preface to Articles by A. Einstein and J.J. Thomson.” Translated by Sean Winkler. Society & Politics – Boris Hessen and the Dialectics of Natural Science 13:87–102.Google Scholar
Ienna, Gerardo and Rispoli, Giulia. 2019. “Boris Hessen at the Crossroads of Science and Ideology: From International Circulation to the Soviet Context.” Society & Politics – Boris Hessen and the Dialectics of Natural Science 13:37–64.Google Scholar
Ilyenkov, Evald. 1982. Leninist Dialectics and the Metaphysics of Positivism. Translator unknown. www.marxists.org (last accessed 4 March 2021).Google Scholar
Joravsky, David. 2009. Soviet Marxism and Natural Science, 1917–1932. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Josephson, Paul. 1991. Physics and Politics in Revolutionary Russia. Berkeley/Los Angeles/Oxford: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josephson, Paul. 2003. “Science, Ideology, and the State: Physics in the Twentieth Century.” In The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 5: The Modern Physical and Mathematical Sciences. Edited by Mary Jo Nye, 579–597. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kojevnikov, Alexei. 2008. “The Phenomenon of Soviet Science.” Osiris 23:115–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kojevnikov, Alexei. 2011. “Probability, Marxism, and Quantum Mechanics.” Yearbook for European Culture of Science 6:211–235.Google Scholar
Landau, Lev and Lifshitz, Evgeny. 1980. Course of Theoretical Physics, 3rd ed., vols. 1–10. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir. 1977a. The Economic Content of Narodism and the Criticism of It in Mr. Struve’s Book (The Reflection of Marxism in Bourgeois Literature). In V.I. Lenin: Collected Works, vol. 1–1893–1894. Edited and translated by the Institute of Marxism-Leninism, Central Committee of the CPSU, 333–508. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir. 1977b. Materialism and Empirio-Criticism. In V.I. Lenin: Collected Works, vol. 1—1908. Edited by Dutt, Clemens and translated by Fineberg, Andrew. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir. 1978. “A Letter to A.M. Gorky (25.2.1908).” In V.I. Lenin: Collected Works , vol. 13—June 1907–April 1908. Edited by Dutt, Clemens and translated by Isaacs, Bernard. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. 1897. Contributions to the Analysis of the Sensations. Translated by May, Cora. Williams. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis de Laplace, Pierre-Simon. 1902. A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. Translated by Frederick Wilson Truscott and Frederick Lincoln Emory. New York: John Wiley & Sons; London: Chapman & Hall, Ltd.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 2010. Manifesto of the Communist Party. In Marx & Engels: Collected Works , vol. 6—Marx & Engels 1845–48. Edited by Daglish, Robert et al. and translated by Cohen, Jack et al., 477–519. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Plekhanov, Georgi. 1940a. The Materialist Conception of History. Translator unknown. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Plekhanov, Georgi. 1940b. The Role of the Individual in History. Translator unknown. New York: International Publishers Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Wolf. 1988. “Boris Hessen and the Politics of the Sociology of Science.” Thesis Eleven 21:103–116.Google Scholar
Steila, Daniela. 2018. “Lenin’s Philosophy in Intellectual Context.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Leninist Political Philosophy. Edited by Rockmore, Tom and Levine, Norman, translated by Pasini, Lucia, 89–120. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Werskey, Gary. 1971. Introduction. In Science at the Cross Roads – Papers Presented to the International Congress of the History of Science and Technology, Held in London from June 29th to July 3rd, 1931 by the Delegates of the USSR. Edited by Bukharin, Nikolai, xi–xxix. London: Frank Cass & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Winkler, Sean. 2020. “The Materialist Dialectic in Boris Hessen’s Newton Papers (1927 and 1931).” Historical Materialism 28 (4):202–234.Google Scholar

Sources in Russian

Bogdanov, Aleksandr. 1899. Poznaniye s istoricheskoy tochki zreniya [Cognition from a Historical Point of View]. Sankt-Peterburg [Saint Petersburg].Google Scholar
Bogdanov, Aleksandr. 1904. «Razvitiye zhizni v prirode i v obshchestve [The Development of Life in Nature and Society]». In Iz psikhologii obshchestva [The Psychology of Society]. Sankt-Peterburg: Elektropechatnya tovarishchestva «Delo» [Electronic Printing ‘Press’].Google Scholar
Bogdanov, Aleksandr, et al. 1910. Ocherki po filosofii marksizm [Studies in Marxist Philosophy]. Moskva [Moscow]: Zvyeno [Link].Google Scholar
Gessen, Boris. 1927a. Predisloviye k statya G. Miye «Problema materii» [Preface to the Article “The Problem of Matter” by G. Mie]. Pod znamenem marksizma [Under the Banner of Marxism] 1:118–119.Google Scholar
Gessen, Boris. 1927b. «Marian Smolukhovskiy (k desyatiletiyu so dnya smerti) [Marian Smoluchowski (On the 10th Anniversary of His Death)]». Pod znamenem marksizma 9:144–148.Google Scholar
Gessen, Boris. 1928. «Mekhanicheskiy materializm i sovremennaya fizika [Mechanistic Materialism and Modern Physics]». Pod znamenem marksizma 7 (8):5–47.Google Scholar
Gessen, Boris. 1929. «Idealisticheskiye techeniya v sovremennoy fizike i borba s nimi [Idealistic Tendencies in Modern Physics and The Struggle against Them]». Molodaya gvardiya [The Young Guard] 3:58–71.Google Scholar
Gessen, Boris. 1936 (?). Materialy i dokumenty po istorii fiziki (granki) [Materials and Documents on the History of Physics (Proofs)]. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Gessen, Boris and Egorshin, Vasiliy. 1927a. «V s’yezd russkikh fizikov [The 5th Congress of Russian Physicists]». Pod znamenem marksizma 1:134–141.Google Scholar
Gessen, Boris. 1927b. «Ob otnoshenii tov. Timiryazeva k sovremennoy nauke [On Cde. Timiryazev’s Attitude towards Contemporary Science]». Pod znamenem marksizma 2 (3):188–199.Google Scholar
Gessen, Boris and Podvolotskiy, Ivan. 1929. «Filosofskiye korni pravago opportunizma [The Philosophical Roots of the Right-Wing Opportunism]». Pod znamenem marksizma 9:1–29.Google Scholar
Korsakov, Sergei. 2018. «Slovo tovarishchu gesseny [The Floor is Given to Mr. Hessen]». Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science] 3:202–204.Google Scholar
Korsakov, Sergei, Kozenko, Aleksandr and Gracheva, Galina. 2015. Boris Mikhailovich Gessen. 1893–1936. Moskva: Nauka [Science].Google Scholar
Stolyarova, Olga. 2017. «Idei Boris Mikhailovich Gessena i otechestvennaya filosofia [The Ideas of Boris Mikhailovich Hessen and Russian Philosophy]». Filosofskiy zhurnal [The Philosophy Journal] 10:112–132.Google Scholar