Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:28:19.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Images of Knowledge, Social Organization, and Attitudes to Research in an Indian Physics Department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Kapil Raj
Kapil Raj
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherches Alexandre Koyré Ecole des Haulers Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sociologists of Third World science, who share the dominant assumption in the philosophy of science that the “culture” of specific substantive fields of scientific inquiry is invariant across the globe, have, after a period of blind optimism devoted to building a critical mass of scientists in the developing countries, relapsed into a bleaker mood and see the Third World as a peripheral region lacking in “creativity” in its research programs.

Challenging the doctrine of the universality of scientific practice by means of an in situ study of an Indian physics laboratory, an attempt is made to bring to light a particular community's shared ideals of knowledge (provided by the specific historico-cultural Indian context) which animate the everyday practice of its field of study and fashion its choice of problems, style of professional communication, attitudes toward experiment, etc. These local ingredients should not be understood as deficiencies with respect to some arbitrary norm (mostly taken as the practice in the particular field of inquiry in the “developed” world) but as what differentiates research practices in different parts of the world.

Type
Controversy: Science as Philosophy
Information
Science in Context , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1988 , pp. 317 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Mary B., and Peter, Buck, 1980. “Scientific Development: The Development of Science, Science and Development, and the Science of Development,” Social Studies of Science 10: 215–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, , Barry, S., 1974. Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bloor, David, 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Jean-Claude, Passeron, 1970. La Reproduction. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel, and Bruno, Latour, eds., 1982. La Science telle qu'elle se fait. Paris: Pandore.Google Scholar
Dedijer, Stevan, 1963. “Underdeveloped Science in Underdeveloped Countries,” Minerva 2: 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edge, David, O., 1979. “Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Critical Review,” History of Science 17: 102–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elkana, Yehuda, 1977. “The Distinctiveness and Universality of Science: Reflections on the Work of Professor Robin Horton,” Minerva 15: 155–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkana, Yehuda, 1981. “A Programmatic Attempt at an Anthropology of Knowledge,” in Sciences and Cultures, ed. Mendelsohn, E. and Elkana, Y., 1–76. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Febvre, Lucien, 1962. “Techniques et machinisme. A propos d'un precis d'histoire des sciences: Sciences et techniques,” in his Pour une histoire à part entière. Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar
Garfield, Eugene, 1983 a. “Mapping Science in the Third World. Part 1,” Current Contents 33: 5–15.Google Scholar
Garfield, Eugene, 1983 b. “Mapping Science in the Third World. Part 2,” Current Contents 34: 5–16.Google Scholar
Glaser, William, and Habers, G. Christopher, 1978. The Brain Drain: Emigration and Return. UNITAR Research Report no. 22. Oxford:Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Goonatilake, Susantha, 1984. Aborted Discovery. Science and Creativity in the Third World. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Hagstrom, William, O., 1965. The Scientific Community. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Handberg, R., 1986. “Practising Western Science in the West: Psychological and Institutional Parallels Between Western and Nonwestern Academic Cultures,” Social Studies of Science 16: 529–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Frank, R., [1925] 1958. Jamsetji Nusserwanji Tata: A Chronicle of His Life. Bombay: Blackie and Son.Google Scholar
Indian Institute of Science, 1985. Annual Report, 1984–85. Bangalore: IISc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas, S., [1962] 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2d ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Steve, Woolgar, 1979. Laboratory Life. The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Long, F. A., 1979. “Science and Technology in India: Their Role in National Development,” in India: A Rising Middle Power, ed. Mellor, J. W.. Boulder, Col.:Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael, E., 1982. “Technical Work and Critical Inquiry: Investigations in a Scientific Laboratory,” Social Studies of Science 12: 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael, E., 1985. Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Maddox, John, and Vera, Rich, 1984. “Excellence in the Midst of Poverty,” Nature 308: 581–600.Google Scholar
Malamoud, Charles, 1987. “Paroles à voir et à entendre,” Cahiers de littérature orale, no. 21: 151–61.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Michael J., 1976. Science Development: Toward the Building of Science in Less Developed Countries. Bloomington, Ind.:PASITAM.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph, and G., Blue, 1980. “The Universal Validity of Science, Cultural Relativism and the Third World,” Minerva 18: 360–63.Google Scholar
Pestre, Dominique, 1984. Physique et physiciens en France 1918–1940. Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael, 1962. “The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory,” Minerva 1: 54–73; reprinted in Shils 1968, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyenson, Lewis, 1982. “Cultural Imperialism and Exact Sciences: German Expansion Overseas 1900–1930,” History of Science 20: 1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai Choudhuri, Arnab, 1985. “Practising Western Science Outside the West: Personal Observations on the Indian Scene,” Social Studies of Science 15: 475–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raj, Kapil, 1986. “Hermeneutics and Cross-cultural Communication in Science: The Reception of Western Scientific Ideas in 19th Century India,” Revue de Synthèse, IVe série, nos 1–2:107–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, Charles E., 1970. “On Writing the History of American Science,” in The State of American History, ed. Bass, H. J., 83–96. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
Salam, Abdus, 1966. “The Isolation of the Scientist in Developing Countries,” Minerva 4: 464–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, Alfred, 1944. “The Stranger,” American Journal of Sociology 50: 363–76 (reprinted in his Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory, ed. Broderson, A., 99–105. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
Sebaly, Kim P., 1985. “The Tatas and University Reform in India, 1898–1914,” History of Education 14: 117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shils, Edward A., 1961. “Scientific Development in the New States,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 17: 48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shils, Edward A., ed., 1968. Criteria for Scientific Development: Public Policy bkand National Goals. Cambridge, Mass.:M.I.T Press.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward A., 1975. Center and Periphery. Essays in Macrosociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shiva, Vandana, andJayanta, Bandhyopadhyay, 1980 a. Science in India. Research Without Programmes - Scientists Without a Community. Bangalore: Indian Institute of Management. Mimeograph.Google Scholar
Shiva, Vandana, and Jayanta, Bandhyopadhyay, 1980 b. “The Large and Fragile Community of Scientists in India,” Minerva 18: 575–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinha, Surajit, 1970. “Indian Scientists: The Socio-Cultural and Organizational Context of their Professional Environment,” in Science, Technology and Culture, ed. Sinha, S.. New Delhi: India International Center.Google Scholar
Spaey, J. et al. , 1971. Science for Development. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N, 1952. Religion and Society Among the Coorgs of South India. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N, 1976. “A Note on Sanskritization and Westernization,” Journal of Asian Studies 15: 481–96.Google Scholar
Statistical Outline of India, 1984. 1985. Bombay: Tata Services.Google Scholar
Stokes, T. D., 1982. “The Double Helix and the Warped Zipper - An Exemplary Tale,” Social Studies of Science 12: 207–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vessuri, Hebe M. C., 1987. “The Social Study of Science in Latin America,” Social Studies of Science 17: 519–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolgar, Steve, 1982. “Laboratory Studies: A Comment on the State of the Art,” Social Studies of Science 12: 481–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar