Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:20:14.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Darwin, Concepción, and the Geological Sublime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2012

Paul White
Paul White*
Affiliation:
Darwin Correspondence Project and Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of Cambridge E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

Darwin's narrative of the earthquake at Concepción, set within the frameworks of Lyellian uniformitarianism, romantic aesthetics, and the emergence of geology as a popular science, is suggestive of the role of the sublime in geological enquiry and theory in the early nineteenth century. Darwin's Beagle diary and later notebooks and publications show that the aesthetic of the sublime was both a form of representing geology to a popular audience, and a crucial structure for the observation and recording of the event from the beginning. The awesome spectacle of the earthquake proved in turn the magnitude of the forces at stake in earth history, and helped to make geology an epic conjoining the history of civilization with the history of the earth.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 25 , Issue 1: Witness to Disaster: Earthquakes and Expertise in Comparative Perspective , March 2012 , pp. 49 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, Malcolm. 1989. The Search for the Picturesque: Landscape, Aesthetics and Tourism in Britain, 1760–1800. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, Malcolm, ed. 1994. The Picturesque: Literary Sources and Documents. 3 vols. Mountfield: Helm Information Ltd.Google Scholar
Annual Register: A Review of Public Events at Home and Abroad for the Year 1835. London: Rivingtons.Google Scholar
Ashfield, Andrew, and de Bolla, Peter, eds. 1996. The Sublime: a Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, Paul et al. , eds. 1987. Charles Darwin's Notebooks, 1836–1844. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Boime, Albert. 1987. Art in the Age of Revolution, 1750–1800. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boime, Albert. 2004. Art in the Age of Counterrevolution, 1815–48. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bowie, Andrew. 1990. Aesthetics and Subjectivity: From Kant to Nietzsche. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Braun, Theodore E. D., and Radner, John B., eds. 2005. The Lisbon Earthquake of 1755: Representations and Reactions. Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Browne, Janet. 1983. The Secular Ark: Studies in the History of Biogeography. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Edmund. [1759] 1958. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful, 2nd ed.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, Frederick et al. , eds. 1985–2010. The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, 19 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cannon, Susan Faye. 1978. Science in Culture. New York: Dawson and Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Chadarevian, Soraya de. 1993. “Graphical Method and Discipline: Self-Recording Instruments in Nineteenth-Century Physiology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24:267–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chancellor, Gordon, and van Wyhe, John. 2009. Charles Darwin's Notebooks from the Voyage of the Beagle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Charles E. 1965. “Science, Reason, and an Angry God: the Literature of an Earthquake.” New England Quarterly 38:340–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, Paul, ed. 1995. The Contemporary Sublime: Sensibilities of Transcendence and Shock. London: Academy Group.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1839. Journal of Researches in the Natural History and Geology of the Countries Visited During the Voyage of H. M. S. Beagle Round the World. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. [1838] 1840. “On the Connexion of Certain Volcanic Phenomena in South America; and On the Formation of Mountain Chains and Volcanos, as the Effect of the Same Power by which Continents are Elevated.” Transactions of the Geological Society of London, 2d ser. 5:601–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1846. Geological Observations on South America. Being the Third Part of the Geology of the Voyage of the Beagle. London: Smith, Elder and Co.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Park, Katherine. 1998. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Dean, Dennis R. 1991. “Robert Mallet and the Founding of Seismology.” Annals of Science 48:39–67.Google Scholar
Dean, Dennis R. 2007. Romantic Landscapes: Geology and Its Cultural Influence in Britain, 1765–1835. Ann Arbor: Scholar's Facsimiles & Reprints.Google Scholar
De Bolla, Peter. 1989. The Discourse of the Sublime. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dettelbach, Michael. 1996a. “Humboldtian Science.” In Cultures of Natural History, edited by Jardine, Nick, Secord, James, and Spary, Emma C., 287–304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dettelbach, Michael. 1996b. “Global Physics and Aesthetic Empire: Humboldt's Physical Portrait of the Tropics.” In Visions of Empire: Voyages, Botany, and Representations of Nature, edited by Miller, David Philip and Reill, Peter Hans, 258–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dettlebach, Michael. 1999. “The Face of Nature: Precise Measurement, Mapping, and Sensibility in the Work of Alexander von Humboldt.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30:473–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Gregorio, Mario, and Gill, Nick, eds. 1990. Charles Darwin's Marginalia, vol. 1. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Ellis, Elizabeth. 2009. “Rio to Valparaiso: Conrad Martens and the Beagle.” In Reframing Darwin: Evolution and Art in Australia, edited by Hoorn, Jeanette, 38–53. Carlton, Victoria: Miegunyah Press.Google Scholar
Felsch, Phillip. 2009. “Mountains of Sublimity, Mountains of Fatigue: Towards a History of Speechlessness in the Alps.” Science in Context 22:341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzroy, Robert, ed. 1839. Narrative of the Surveying Voyages of his Majesty's Ships Adventure and Beagle, 3 vols. London: Henry Colburn.Google Scholar
Geological Inquiries. [1808] 2009. In Geological Society, London, Special Publications 317:449–456.Google Scholar
Georgi, Matthias. 2005. “The Lisbon Earthquake and Scientific Knowledge in the British Public Sphere.” In The Lisbon Earthquake of 1755: Representations and Reactions. Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, edited by Braun, Theodore and Radner, John, 81–96. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Guidoboni, Emanuela. 1988. “Earthquakes, Theories from 1600 to 1800.” In Sciences of the Earth: An Encyclopedia of Events, People, and Phenomena, edited by Good, Gregory, 205–214. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Guidoboni, Emanuela, and Ebel, John. 2009. Earthquakes and Tsunamis in the Past: a Guide to Techniques in Historical Seismology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herbert, Sandra. 1980. “The Red Notebook of Charles Darwin.” Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) 7:1–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, Sandra. 2005. Charles Darwin, Geologist. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Heringman, Noah. 2004. Romantic Rocks, Aesthetic Geology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Herschel, John. 1830. A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Alexander von. 1808. Ansichten der Natur. Tubingen: J. G. Cotta.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Alexander von. 1814–29. Personal Narrative of Travels to the Equanoctial Regions of the New Continent, During the Years 1799–1804. Translated by Williams, Helen. 7 vols. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Alexander von. 1849. Aspects of Nature, in Different Lands and Climates, translated by Sabine, Mrs.. 2 vols. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Ingram, Robert. 2005. “Earthquakes, Religion and Public Life in Britain During the 1750s.” In The Lisbon Earthquake of 1755: Representations and Reactions. Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, edited by Braun, Theodore and Radner, John, 97–115. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1790] 1994. Critique of Judgment, translated by Pluhar, Werner. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Keynes, Richard, ed. 1988. Charles Darwin's Beagle Diary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kohn, David. 1996. “The Aesthetic Contruction of Darwin's Theory.” In The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science, edited by Tauber, Alfred, 13–48. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lamb, Jonathan. 1997. “The Sublime.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Volume IV: The Eighteenth Century, edited by Nisbet, H. B. and Rawson, Claude, 394–416. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leask, Nigel. 2003. “Darwin's ‘Second Sun’: Alexander von Humboldt and the Genesis of The Voyage of the Beagle.” In Literature, Science, Psychoanalysis, 1830–1970: Essays in Honour of Gillian Beer, edited by Small, Helen and Tate, Trudi, 13–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lubrich, Oliver. 2004. “Alexander von Humboldt: Revolutionizing Travel Literature.” Monatshefte für deutschesprachige Literatur und Kultur 96:360–87.Google Scholar
Lyell, Charles. 1830–33. Principles of Geology. 3 vols. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1991. “The Sublime and the Avant-Garde.” In The Inhuman: Reflections on Time, translated by Bennington, Geoffrey and Bowlby, Rachel, 89–107. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mallet, Robert. 1846a. “On the Dynamics of Earthquakes.” Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy 21:1–105.Google Scholar
Mallet, Robert. 1846b. “On the Objects, Construction, and Use of Certain New Instruments for Self-registration of the Passage of Earthquake Shocks.” Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy 21:107–13.Google Scholar
Mallet, Robert, 1850. “First Report on the Facts of Earthquake Phoenomena.” Report of the British Association for 1850, 1–87. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Mallet, Robert, 1851. “Second Report on the Facts of Earthquake Phoenomena.” Report of the British Association for 1851, 272–320. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Mallet, Robert. 1862. Great Neapolitan Earthquake of 1857. The First Principles of Observational Seismology as Developed in the Report of the Royal Society of London of the Expedition Made by Command of the Society into the Interior of the Kingdom of Naples. 2 vols. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Marshall, David. 1997. “Ut pictura poesis.” In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Volume IV: The Eighteenth Century, edited by Nisbet, H. B. and Rawson, Claude, 681–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolson, Malcolm. 1987. “Alexander von Humboldt, Humboldtian Science and the Origins of the Study of Vegetation.” History of Science 25:167–194.Google Scholar
Nicolson, Marjorie Hope. 1959. Mountain Gloom and Mountain Glory: The Development of the Aesthetics of the Infinite. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Ralph. 2007. The Earth on Show: Fossils and the Poetics of Popular Science, 1802–1856. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oldroyd, David. 1996. Thinking About the Earth: A History of Ideas in Geology. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louis. 1992. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, Gene. 2004. “Reading the Lisbon Earthquake: Adorno, Lyotard, and the Contemporary Sublime.” Yale Journal of Criticism 17:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Joshua. 1798. The Works of Joshua Reynolds. 2nd ed. 3 vols. London:.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Frank. 1991. “Darwin's Search for a Theory of the Earth: Symmetry, Simplicity and Speculation.” British Journal for the History of Science 24:193–229.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert J. 2002. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S. 1963. “The Foundation of the Geological Society of London: Its Scheme for Co-operative Research and Its Struggle for Indepencence.” British Journal for the History of Science 1:325–55.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S. 2008. Worlds before Adam: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secord, James. 1986. Controversy in Victorian Geology: The Cambrian-Silurian Dispute. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Secord, James. 1991. “The Discovery of a Vocation: Darwin's Early Geology.” British Journal for the History of Science 24:133–57.Google Scholar
Sloane, Phillip R. 2001.“‘The Sense of Sublimity’: Darwin on Nature and Divinity.” In Science in Theistic Contexts: Cognitive Dimensions. Osiris, 2nd Series, 16:251–269.Google Scholar
Sponsel, Alistair. 2009. “Coral Reef Formation and the Sciences of Earth, Life, and Sea, c. 1770–1952.” PhD. diss. Princeton University.Google Scholar
Van Wyhe, John, ed. 2009. Charles Darwin's Shorter Publications, 1829–1883. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walls, Laura Dassow. 2009. The Passage to Cosmos: Alexander von Humboldt and the Shaping of America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. 1839. “Presidential Address.” Proceedings of the Geological Society of London 2:624–49.Google Scholar
Whittembury, Guillermo, et al. 2003. “Charles Darwin, Robert Fitzroy and Simón Rodríguez Met in Concepción, Chile, after the Earthquake of February 20, 1835.” Interciencia 28:549–53.Google Scholar