Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:01:05.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Please, come in.” Being a charlatan, or the question of trustworthy knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2022

Irina Podgorny  and
Daniel Gethmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Science in Context , Volume 33 , Issue 4: Charlatans , December 2020 , pp. 355 - 361
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allsen, Thomas T. 2019. The Steppe and the Sea: Pearls in the Mongol Empire. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1859. La vérité sur le docteur noir. Paris: La Librerie Nouvelle.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1860. “Parisian Medical Intelligence (From our Correspondent).” The Lancet, January 31: 75-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 1865. Mémoire pour M. Bennati chirurgien-opérateur, commandeur de l’Ordre Asiatique du Grand-Mogol, et M. Colandre docteur en Médecine. Prévention d’exercise illégal de la médicine et de vente de remèdes secrets. Cour Impérial de Duoai.Google Scholar
Asmussen, Tina and Hole, Rößler, eds. 2013. /Scharlatan! Eine Figur der Relegation in der frühneuzeitlichen Gelehrtenkultur./ Special issue of /Zeitsprünge/, 17 (2/3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosland, Maurice. 2004. “The Officiers de Santé of the French Revolution: A Case Study in the Changing Language of Medicine.” Medical History 48(2):229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauvel, Charles. 1859. La vraie vérité sur M. Vriès, dit le docteur noir. Paris: A. Delahaye.Google Scholar
Fucini, Renato. 1921. “Il ciarlatani: Il Tofani, il Bennati.” In Acqua Passata: Storielle et aneddoti della mia vita. Firenze: La voce.Google Scholar
Gambaccini, Piero. 2004. “Fragments.” In Mountebanks and Medicasters: A History of Italian Charlatans from the Middle Ages to the Present. Translated by Gambaccini, Piero. Jefferson NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
Garnier, Pierre. 1881. “Association du médecin et du charlatan.” In Dictionnaire annuel des progrès des sciences et institutions médicales, edited by Garnier, Pierre, 269–272. Paris: Germer Baillière.Google Scholar
Gouriet, Jean-Baptiste. 1819. Les charlatans célèbres, ou Tableau historique des bateleurs, des baladins, des jongleurs, des bouffons, des opérateurs, des voltigeurs, des escamoteurs, des filous, des escrocs, des devins, des tireurs de cartes, des diseurs de bonne aventure, et généralement de tous les personnages qui se sont rendus célèbres dans les rues et sur les places publiques de Paris, depuis une haute antiquité jusqu'à nos jours. Second edition. Paris.Google Scholar
Heller, Robert. 1978. “Officiers de santé: the second-class doctors of nineteenth-century France.” Medical History 22(1):25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessona, Michele. 1884. Venti anni fa [Collection of short stories]. Roma: E. Perino.Google Scholar
Podgorny, Irina. 2012. Charlatanes: Crónicas de Remedios Incurables. Buenos Aires: Eterna Cadencia.Google Scholar
Podgorny, Irina. 2013. “Travelling Museums and Itinerant Collections in Nineteenth-Century Latin America.” Museum History Journal 6: 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podgorny, Irina. 2015. “A Charlatan’s Album: Cartes-de-visite from Bolivia, Argentina and Paraguay (1860-1880).” In From Dust to Digital: Ten Years of the Endangered Archives Programme. Edited by Maja Kominko, 417-443. Cambridge UK: Open Book Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podgorny, Irina. 2016. “Mentiras de Perogrullo: Las expediciones al Chaco de Leopoldo Arnaud y de Eduardo L. Holmberg (Argentina, 1884-1885).” In Aproximaciones a lo local y lo global: América Latina en la Historia de la Ciencia Contemporánea. Edited by Edna Díaz and Gisela Mateos, 11-32. Mexico: Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano.Google Scholar
Podgorny, Irina. 2020. “La momia y el herbolario: Un ensayo sobre la historia de la arqueología del siglo XX.” Anales de Arqueología y Etnología 75(1):23–51. http://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/analarqueyetno/article/view/4269 (last accessed April 6 2021).Google Scholar
Porter, Roy. 1987. “The Language of Quackery in England, 1660-1800.” In The Social History of Language, edited by Burke, Peter and Porter, Roy, 73–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Procès Morel : Exercice illégal de la médecine, magnétisme, escroqueries, blessures par imprudentes, Niort. 1865. Tribunal Correctionnel de Niort.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Matthew. 1988. Professional and Popular Medicine in France, 1770–1830: The Social World of Medical Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siegert, Bernhard. 2006. Passagiere und Papiere: Schreibakte auf der Schwelle zwischen Spanien und Amerika. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Thompson, Charles J. S. 1928. The Quacks of Old London. London: Brentano’s.Google Scholar