Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T04:23:40.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Models, Simulations, and Their Objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Sergio Sismondo
Sergio Sismondo
Affiliation:
Department of PhilosophyQueen's UniversityKingston, Canada. K7L 3N6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editor's Introduction
Information
Science in Context , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , Summer 1999 , pp. 247 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashworth, William. 1996. “Memory, Efficiency, and Symbolic Analysis: Charles Babbage, John Herschel, and the Industrial Mind.” Isis 87:629–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breslau, Daniel. 1997. “Contract Shop Epistemology: Credibility and Problem Construction in Applied Social Science.” Social Studies of Science 27:363–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boumans, Marcel. 1999. “Built-In Justification.” Forthcoming in Morgan, M. and Morrison, M., editors, Models as Mediator. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francoeur, Eric. 1997. “The Forgotten Tool: The Design and Use of Molecular Models.” Social Studies of Science 27:7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, Peter. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1968. Languages of Art. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Elementary Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, Mary. 1966. Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Hilborn, Ray, and Marc, Mangel. 1997. The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 1995. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, edited by Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Katteriberg, K., and Maskell, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr, Cetina, Karin, D. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1983. “Give Me a Laboratory and I will Raise the World.” In Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, edited by Knorr Cetina, K. D. and Michael, Mulkay London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pasqualucci, Cristina, Lucille, Ravà; Carla, Rossi, and Giuseppe, Schinaia. 1998. “Estimating the Size of the HIV/AIDS Epidemic: Complementary Use of the Empirical Bayesian Back-Calculation and the Mover-Stayer Model for Gathering the Largest Amount of Information.” Simulation 71:213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redhead, Michael. 1980. “Models in Physics.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31:145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheinberger, Hans-Jorg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1984. “Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology.” Social Studies of Science 14:481–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sismondo, Sergio. 1997. “Deflationary Metaphysics and the Construction of Laboratory Mice.” Metaphilosophy 28:219–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sismondo, Sergio. 1999. “Island Biogeography and the Multiple Domains of Models.” Biology and Philosophy, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Sluijs, Jeroen van der, Josée, van Eijndhoven, Simon, Shackley and Brian, Wynne. 1998. “Anchoring Devices in Science for Policy: The Case of Consensus around Climate Sensitivity.” Social Studies of Science 28:291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar