No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 October 2008
In 1868, when the Meiji emperor had his powers ‘restored’ by the political revolution that destroyed the old feudal system of the Tokugawa shoguns, Japan was a predominantly agricultural economy. By the time of the emperor's death in 1912 Japan had achieved significant industrialisation and in 1920, after a further boom during the First World War, she was well advanced along the road to a distinctive type of industrial development based on textile goods for export, heavy industry for domestic civilian and military capital investment, and considerable state intervention in economic and social organisation. In the mid 1880s, about 70% of the gainfully-employed population were engaged in agriculture, producing well over 40% of the gross national product. Farmers derived about three-quarters of their total income from agricultural activities, although agriculture probably absorbed only about 60% of total work hours for the labour force as a whole, with another 2% each for fishing and construction, and a further 16% or so for traditional mining and manufacturing. By 1920, the GDP of the Japanese economy had grown almost three-fold, but the share supplied by agriculture was under 30%, while just over 50% of workers were employed there.1.
1. Francks, P., Japanese Economic Development: Theory and Practice (London, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Tables 3.1, 13.2; Crawcour, E., ‘Industrialization and Technological Change’, in Duus, Peter (ed.), Cambridge History of Japan, Volume 6, (Cambridge, 1988), pp. 406–7.Google Scholar
2. Two recent and convenient summaries of the literature will be found in Francks, Japanese Economic Development and Macpherson, W.J., Economic Development of Japan c1868–1941, (Economic History Society, Studies in Economic & Social History, Basingstoke, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a flavour of current controversies see Nishida, Y., ‘Growth of Meiji Landlord System and Tenancy Disputes after World War I’ and R. Smethurst, ‘A Challenge to Orthodoxy and Its Orthodox Critics’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 15 (1989), 389–416 & 417–37.Google Scholar
3. See, for example, Smith, T.C., Agrarian Origins of Modern Japan, (Stanford, 1959)Google Scholar, and Hanley, S.B. and Yamamura, K., Economic and Demographic Change in Preindustrial Japan, 1600–1868 (Princeton, 1977).Google Scholar
4. The Ronoha school argued that the Meiji Restoration was essentially a bourgeois revolution, while the Kozaha school stressed the surviving feudal elements in the Meiji state. See Yasuba, Y., ‘Anatomy of the Debate on Japanese Capitalism’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 2 (1975), 63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Sumiya, M. and Taira, K. (eds.), An Outline of Japanese Economic History. Major Works and Research Findings (Tokyo, 1979), pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
5. A good example will be found in Waswo, A., Japanese Landlords: The Decline of a Rural Elite, (Berkeley, 1977).Google Scholar
6. Ohkawa, K., Shinohara, M., Umemura, M., Ito, M. and Noda, T., The Growth Rate of the Japanese Economy since 1870 (Tokyo, 1957).Google Scholar
7. Ohkawa, K. and Rosovsky, H., ‘The Role of Agriculture in Japanese Economic Development’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 9 (1960), 43–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Johnson, B., ‘The Japanese “Model” of Economic Development: Its Relevance to Developing Nations’ and G. Ranis, ‘The Financing of Japanese Economic Development’, in Ohkawa, K. et al. (eds), Agriculture and Economic Growth: Japan's Experience (Tokyo, 1970), pp. 37–57, 58–104.Google Scholar
8. Hayami, Y., A Century of Agricultural Growth in Japan (Tokyo, 1975), p. 47.Google Scholar
9. Nakamura, J., Agricultural Production and the Economic Development of Japan, 1873–1922 (Princeton, 1966).Google Scholar
10. Ranis, ‘Financing Japanese Economic Development’, Table 6.
11. J. Nakamura, Agricultural Production, Table 7–5; idem., ‘Meiji Land, Redistribution of income and Savings from Agriculture’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 9 (1960), 43–68.
12. Hayami, Y. and Yamada, S., ‘Agricultural Productivity at the Beginning of Industrialization’, in Ohkawa, et al. (eds.), Agriculture and Economic Growth, Table 1.Google Scholar
13. Ohkawa, K., Shinohara, M. and Umemura, M. (eds.), Estimates of Long-Term Economic Statistics of Japan, (Tokyo 1965-)Google Scholar; see also Ohkawa, K. & Shinohara, M., Patterns of Japanese Economic Development. A Quantitative Analysis (New Haven, 1979)Google Scholar and Minami, R., The Economic Development of Japan. A Quantitative Study (Basingstoke, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Ohkawa, and Shinohara, , Patterns of Japanese Economic Development, Tables 4.2, 4.3, 4.6 and pp. 86–8Google Scholar; Crawcour, , ‘Industrialization and Technological Change’, pp. 409–10.Google Scholar
15. Hayami, and Yamada, , ‘Agricultural Productivity’, pp. 126–7.Google Scholar
16. ibid., p. 126 fn. 26.
17. Choi, Kee il, ‘Technological Diffusion in Agriculture under the Bakuhan System’, Journal of Asian Studies, 30 (1971), 749–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. For continued scepticism, see Sinha, R., ‘Agriculture and Economic Development in Meiji Japan’, Development and Change, 10 (1979), 608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Sinha, R., ‘Unresolved Issues in Japan's Early Economic development’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 16 (1979), 123–9Google Scholar; Minami, , Economic Development, pp. 16, 340.Google Scholar
20. Mundle, S. and Ohkawa, K., ‘Agricultural Surplus Flow in Japan’, The Developing Economies, 17 (1979), 247–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Minami, R., Economic Development, pp. 95–8.Google Scholar
21. Mundle and Ohkawa, ‘Agricultural Surplus’, Tables III and V. The figure for government investment in agriculture is total investment in the primary sector – including riparian and public works, and natural disaster reconstructions (p. 254).
22. Kato, Y.,‘ Development of Long-term Agricultural Credit’, in Ohkawa, et al. , (eds.) Agricultrue and Economic Growth, pp. 346–7.Google Scholar
23. See, for example, Yamamura, K., ‘Toward a re-examination of the economic history of Tokugawa Japan, 1600–1867’, Journal of Economic History, 33 (1973), 509–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Yamamura, K., ‘Meiji Land Tax Reform’ in Jansen, M. and Rozman, G. (eds.), Japan in Transition: From Tokugawa to Meiji (Princeton, 1985)Google Scholar, Tables 14.2 and 14.3.
25. Yamamura, , ‘Meiji Land Tax Reform’, pp. 392–3.Google Scholar
26. Smethurst, R., Agriculture Development and Tenancy Disputes in Japan, 1859–1940 (Princeton, 1986), pp. 66–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Waswo, A., ‘The Transformation of Rural Society, 1900–1950’, in Cambridge History of Japan 6, p. 543Google Scholar; Nishida, Y., ‘Meiji Landlord System’, pp. 394–401Google Scholar; Morris, M., ‘The Problem of the Peasant Agriculturalist in Meiji Japan’, Far Eastern Quarterly Review, 15 (1956), 359–63.Google Scholar
27. Francks, , Technology, p. 69.Google Scholar The sample was very small, comprising 38 villages in total.
28. ibid., pp. 36, 65ff.
29. Waswo, ‘Transformation’, Tables 11.1, 11.2.
30. Smith, , ‘Agrarian Origins’, pp. 152–5.Google Scholar
31. Smethurst, , Agricultural Development, pp. 301–3.Google Scholar
32. A survey by the Industrial Bank of Japan showed that in 1921 actual rents represented 51% of the crop of single-cropped land and 55% of the crop of double cropped land, while the rents actually paid were 5–6% lower. Dore, R., Land Reform in Japan, (Oxford, 1959), p. 43.Google Scholar
33. Napier, R., ‘The Transformation of the Japanese Labor Market, 1894–1937’ in Najita, T. and Koschmann, J. (eds.), Conflict in Modern Japanese History (Princeton, 1982), pp. 342–65,Google Scholar Table 2.
34. Waswo, , Japanese Landlords, esp. pp. 38–9Google Scholar; Dore, , Land Reform, p. 49.Google Scholar
35. Francks, P., Technology and Agricultural Development in Pre–War Japan, pp. 62, 77–8Google Scholar; Hayami, Y. and Yamada, S., ‘Technological Progress in Agriculture’, in Ohkawa, K. and Hayami, Y. (eds.), Economic Growth. The Japanese Experience since the Meiji Era, (Tokyo, 1973), pp. 135–61,Google Scholar Table 5A–4.
36. Francks, , Technology, p. 77Google Scholar; Hayami and Yamada, ‘Technological Progress’, Table 5A–4.
37. Ishikawa, S., Essays on Technology, Employment and Institutions in Economic Development, (Tokyo, 1981), pp. 15–20Google Scholar; Francks, Technology, Chs. 4–8.
38. Francks, , Technology, pp. 192–5, 256–7Google Scholar, Table 8.5 and Appendix Table 1.
39. Bray, F., The Rice Economies. Technology and Development in Asian Societies, (Oxford, 1986), pp. 154–5Google Scholar; Ishikawa, , Essays on Technology pp. 1–147.Google Scholar
40. On these developments, see Smethurst, Agricultural Development, Chs 2–3, and Sugiyama, S., Japan's Industrialization in the World Economy, 1859–1899 (London, 1988)Google Scholar, Ch. 4.
41. For a case-study of Yamanashi Prefecture, see Smethurst, Agricultural Development, Chs. 2–3.
42. Bowen, R., Rebellion and Democracy in Meiji Japan (Berkeley, 1980), pp. 102–3.Google Scholar
43. Hemmi, K., ‘Primary Product Exports and Economic Development: the Case of Silk’, in Ohkawa, et al. , (eds.), Agriculture and Economic Growth, pp. 314–7.Google Scholar
44. Saito, O., ‘The Rural Economy: Commercial Agriculture, By-Employment and Wage Work’, in Jansen & Rozman (eds.), Japan in Transition, pp. 416–20.Google Scholar
45. Smith, , Agrarian Origins, pp. 129, 131.Google Scholar
46. Tussing, A., ‘The Labor Force in Meiji Economic Growth: A Quantitative Study of Yamanashi Prefecture’, in Ohkawa, et al. , (eds.), Agriculture and Economic Growth, pp. 207, 210–11Google Scholar; Nakamura, T., Economic Growth in Prewar Japan (New Haven, 1983), p. 113.Google Scholar
47. Quoted in Hane, M., Peasants, Rebels and Outcastes: the Underside of Modern Japan (New York, 1982), p. 178.Google Scholar
48. See Tsurumi, E., Factory Girls: Women in the Thread Mills of Meiji Japan (Princeton, 1990).Google Scholar
49. One survey of average daily wage rates between 1896 and 1903, quoted in Hane, , Peasants, Rebels and Outcastes, pp. 282–3Google Scholar, shows that male farm workers consistently earned less than textile workers, carpenters or factory day-labourers, while female farm workers earned about the same as textile workers. Such comparisons do not take account of the numbers of days worked, only of the rate of pay for each day worked. Official figures for nominal wage rates also have to be treated with some caution, since industrial workers were subject to a number of deductions that meant they rarely received the official wage.
50. Francks, , Technology, pp. 188–91.Google Scholar
51. Tussing, , ‘Labor Force’, pp. 210–11.Google Scholar
52. Brandt, Loren, ‘Interwar Japanese Agriculture: Revisionist Views on the Impact of the Colonial Rice Policy and the Labor-Surplus Hypothesis’, Explorations in Economic History, 30 (1993), 269–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Table 5; and Napier, ‘Transformation of the Japanese Labor Market’, Table 1.
53. Minami's argument, based on the construction of a production function for agriculture, that the ‘turning point’ at which surplus rural labour was absorbed was around 1960 has not won general acceptance. See Minami, Economic Development, chapter 9 and Taira, K., ‘Review Article: Development, Growth, and the Long Run’, Economic Development, and Cultural Change, 37 (1989), 430–1.Google Scholar
54. Francks, , Technology, pp. 188–91.Google Scholar
55. Both estimates are by Mataji Umemura – that based on individuals in Umemura, M. et al. , Long-term Economic Statistics of Japan, Volume 9: Agriculture and Forestry (Tokyo, 1966)Google Scholar, and that based on households in Umemura, M. et al. , LTES, Volume 2: Labour Force (Tokyo, 1988)Google Scholar. See Brandt, , ‘ Interwar Japanese Agriculture’, pp. 271–2.Google Scholar
56. Quoted in Dore, , Land Reform, p. 62Google Scholar Contrast this with the famous encapsulation of the feudal view of rural society – peasants should not be allowed to die, nor yet to live’.
57. Waswo, , ‘Transformation’, pp. 548–9Google Scholar; Francks, , Technology, p. 87Google Scholar; Sumiya, and Taira, , Japanese Economic History, p. 292.Google Scholar