Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:49:36.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Policy on the Hoof’: Sir Robert Peel, Sir Edward Knatchbull and the Trial of the Elham Machine Breakers, 1830

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2004

CARL J. GRIFFIN
CARL J. GRIFFIN
Affiliation:
School of Geography, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, S017 1BJ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On 22nd October 1830 Sir Edward Knatchbull passed sentence on seven men for threshing-machine breaking in the Elham Valley area of East Kent. The four day sentence enraged both local farmers and Home Secretary Peel alike, and was seized upon by other labourers and artisans hostile to threshing-machines who believed that Knatchbull had legitimised such acts of rural Luddism. The trial sparked an intensification of ‘Swing’ in East Kent and for the first time acts of overt protest beyond. Knatchbull, upon being pressed by George Maule, the Treasury Solicitor, admitted that the sentences could not have been otherwise under circumstances he was not at liberty to disclose. This paper examines these circumstances and uncovers a bizarre chain of events which shed new light on both the genesis of ‘Swing’ and also upon local-central government relations regarding policy implementation and creation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Rural History , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , October 2004 , pp. 127 - 148
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

My thanks go to Andrew Charlesworth and Paul Glennie for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.