Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T22:11:30.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Laughing Matter? Marital Discord and Gender Control in Seventeenth-Century England1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2009

Elizabeth Foyster
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For the vast majority of men and women in seventeenth-century England the act of marriage created an indissoluble union and represented a life long commitment. Legal divorce was a lengthy and costly procedure which discriminated against women, and informal separations or desertions were socially frowned upon and often economically disadvantageous. So marital discord had to be overcome before it deteriorated into a situation of marriage breakdown. Elaborate ways of restoring and maintaining marital harmony were established through use of the cucking stool and ‘charivari’. By these means, public attention was focused upon behaviour which caused discord: the scolding wife was punished and the husband who was a cuckold or had been beaten by his wife, humiliated. Meanwhile, conduct books proffered advice to couples on how to avoid such marital discontent and its consequences.

Type
Research Article
Information
Rural History , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , April 1993 , pp. 5 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

2. See for example, Phillips, Roderick, Untying the Knot: A Short History of Divorce, (Cambridge, 1991), pp. 64–6, 80–92.Google Scholar

3. See, Ingram, Martin, ‘Ridings, Rough Music and the ‘Reform of Popular Culture’ in Early Modern England’, Past and Present, vol. 105, (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Underdown, David, ‘The Taming of the Scold: The Enforcement of Patriarchal Authority in Early Modern England’, in Fletcher, Anthony and Stevenson, John (eds), Order and Disorder in Early Modern England, (Cambridge, 1985).Google Scholar

4. See for example, Gouge, William, Of Domesticall Duties, Eight Treatises, (3rd. edn., London, 1634).Google Scholar

5. Ingram, , ‘Ridings, Rough Music’, Past and Present, 105, p. 111.Google Scholar

6. Underdown, , ‘The Taming of the Scold’, Order and Disorder, pp. 120, 123–6, 128–9.Google Scholar

7. Neuburg, Victor E., Popular Literature: A History and Guide (Harmondsworth, 1977), p. 62Google Scholar. The ballads used for this article have been taken from four printed collections: The Roxburghe Ballads, Vols. 1–3 ed. Chappell, W. (The Ballad Society 1871–1880)Google Scholar and Vols. 4–9, ed. J.W. Ebsworth (The Ballad Society 1883–99); The Euing Collection of English Broadside Ballads, introduction by Holloway, J., (Glasgow, 1971)Google Scholar; Rollins, Hyder Edwards (ed.), A Pepysian Garland – Block Letter Broadside Ballads of the Years 1595–1639, (Cambridge, 1971)Google Scholar; and Clark, Andrew (ed.), The Shirburn Ballads 1585–1616 (Oxford, 1907)Google Scholar. The ballads in this article have been dated as far as possible with reference to the notes contained in these collections and to Rollins, Hyder Edwards, An Analytical Index to the Ballad Entries (1557–1709) In the Registers of the Company of the Stationers of London, (North Carolina, 1924)Google Scholar, in which Rollins has listed the date at which ballads were registered with the Company. It is important to note that a ballad could be illegally in circulation long before it was registered.

8. Spufford, Margaret, The Great Reclothing of Rural England: Petty Chapmen and their Wares in the Seventeenth Century (1984), pp. 85–9Google Scholar; Shakespeare, William, The Winter's Tale, Act IV, iii–iv.Google Scholar

9. Watt, Tessa, Cheap Print and Popular Piety, 1550–1640, (Cambridge 1991), pp. 11–12.Google Scholar

10. Bownde, Nicholas, The Doctrine of the Sabbath (London, 1595), p. 242Google Scholar, as cited in Spufford, Margaret, Small Books and Pleasant Histories (London, 1981), p. 10.Google Scholar

11. Watt, , Cheap Print, p. 37.Google Scholar

12. Cressy, David, Literacy and the Social Order (Cambridge, 1980), pp. 128–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13. Parry, Edward Abbott, (ed.), Letters from Dorothy Osborne to Sir William Temple 1652–54 (London, 1903), p. 86.Google Scholar

14. See, Ingram, Martin, Church Courts, Sex and Marriage in England 1570–1640, (Cambridge, 1987)Google Scholar and Quaife, G.R., Wanton Wenches and Wayward Wives – Peasants and Illicit Sex in early Seventeenth Century England (London, 1979).Google Scholar

15. Wurzbach, Natascha, The Rise of the English Street Ballad, (Cambridge, 1990), p. 52.Google Scholar

16. See, Ingram, , ‘Ridings, Rough Music’, p. 98Google Scholar, and Thomas, Keith, ‘The Place of Laughter in Tudor and Stuart England’, The Times Literary Supplement (01 21st, 1977), p. 77.Google Scholar

17. Euing, No. 289, p. 473.Google Scholar

18. Roxburghe, II, 43, p. 483Google Scholar, lines 55–6.

19. ‘Household Talke, Or; Good Councell for a Married Man’, Roxburghe I 148, 149, p. 446Google Scholar, lines 122–5, (printed in the reign of James I).

20. ‘The Merry Cuckold’, Roxburghe, I 256, 257, p. 7, line 37, (06 1630).Google Scholar

21. For example, ‘The Lancashire Cuckold’, Euing, No. 200, p. 320Google Scholar, lines 23–4.

22. Wurzbach, , Rise of the English Street Ballad, p. 21.Google Scholar

23. Roxburghe, I, 148, 149, p. 442Google Scholar, line 18.

24. Roxburghe, I, 30, 31, p. 100Google Scholar, line 34.

25. Crawford, Patricia, Exploring Women's Past, (London, 1984), p. 66.Google Scholar

26. Euing No. 321, p. 350Google Scholar, line 8.

27. Ibid., line 42; McLaren, Angus, Reproductive Rituals (Oxford, 1984), p. 35Google Scholar describes this practice.

28. For example see, Gouge, , Of Domesticall Duties, pp. 223–4.Google Scholar

29. Hill, Christopher, The World Turned Upside Down, (London, 1972), p. 257.Google Scholar

30. Roxburghe, I, 30, 31, p. 100Google Scholar, line 15, see also ‘The Lancashire Cuckold’, Euing, No. 200, p. 320Google Scholar for another example of this type of behaviour.

31. Roxburghe II, 43, p. 482Google Scholar, line 47.

32. Quaife, , Wanton Wenches, p. 142.Google Scholar

33. Euing, No. 200, p. 320Google Scholar, line 70, Roxburghe, I, 30, 31, p. 103Google Scholar, lines 116–18.

34. Euing, No. 200, p. 320Google Scholar, line 73.

35. Roxburghe, I, 148, 149, p. 441Google Scholar, line 7.

36. Roxburghe, I, 256, 257, p. 6Google Scholar, line 30.

37. See, Sharpe, J.A., ‘Plebeian Marriage in Stuart England: Some Evidence from Popular Literature’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, Fifth Series, 36, (1986), pp. 80–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Sharpe, J.A. ‘Defamation and Sexual Slander in Early Modern England’, Borthicick Papers, 58, (1981), p. 19.Google Scholar

38. Sharpe, , ‘Plebeian Marriage’, pp. 80–81Google Scholar, and for examples in ballad literature of where women are labelled as gossips see, ‘The Lamentation of a New-Married Man’, Roxburghe, I, 216, 217, p. 36Google Scholar, lines 71–4 ‘The Cruell Shrow’, Roxburghe, I, 28, 29, p. 95Google Scholar, lines 33–4, and ‘The Married Man's Miserie’, Roxburghe, I, 46, 47, p. 152Google Scholar, line 73.

39. This ballad evidence contrasts with that of the defamation cases being presented in the church courts in this period. The evidence of defamation cases suggests that it was largely women who were concerned about their sexual reputations, see Sharpe, J.A., ‘Defamation and Sexual Slander in Early Modern England’, Borthwick Papers, 58, (1981), pp. 15–17.Google Scholar

40. Shirburn, No. LXIV, pp. 263–7.Google Scholar

41. Roxburghe, I, 510, 511, p. 233Google Scholar, line 36.

42. Powell, Christopher, ‘Humour as a Form of Social Control: A Deviance Approach’ in Chapman, Anthony J. and Foot, Hugh C. (eds.), It's A Funny Thing, Humour (Oxford, 1977), p. 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43. Ingram, , ‘Ridings, Rough Music’, p. 98.Google Scholar

44. As cited in Thomas, , ‘The Place of Laughter’, TLS, 01 21st, 1977, p. 80Google Scholar; there are no footnotes in this publication.

45. Williams, H. (ed.), The Poems of Jonathan Swift, (Oxford, 1937), i, p. 221Google Scholar, as cited in Ingram, Martin, ‘Ridings, Rough Music and Mocking Rhymes in Early Modern England’, in Reay, Barry (ed.) Popular Culture in Seventeenth-Century England, (Kent, 1985), p. 176.Google Scholar

46. Richman, David, Laughter, Pain, and Wonder – Shakespeare's Comedies and the Audience in the Theater, (Newark USA, 1990), p. 16.Google Scholar

47. Cited in Gupta, S.C. Sen, Shakespearian Comedy, (Oxford, 1950), p. 1.Google Scholar

48. Wurzbach, , Rise of the English Street Ballad, p. 63.Google Scholar

49. Roxburghe, I, 256, 257, p. 5Google Scholar, lines 1–4.

50. Nietzsche, Friedrich, Daybreak – Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality, (Cambridge, 1986), trans. Hollingdale, R., p. 16Google Scholar, n. 18.

51. Taylor, John, Divers Crabtree Lectures, Expressing the Severall Languages that Shrews read to their Husbands (1639), pp. 73–4Google Scholar, as cited in Underdown, David, Revel, Riot and Rebellion – Popular Politics and Culture in England 1603–1660, (Oxford, 1987), p. 39.Google Scholar

52. ‘The Cuckold's Lamentation of a Bad Wife’, Roxburghe, II, 89, p. 637Google Scholar, line 58.

53. Roxburghe, II, 56, p. 189Google Scholar, lines 45–6.

54. Roxburghe, II, 51, p. 509Google Scholar, line 10.

55. Thomas, Keith, Man and the Natural World, Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800, (Harmondsworth, 1983), p. 43.Google Scholar

56. Topsell, E., The Historie of Foure-footed Beasts, (1607), pp. 536–40Google Scholar, as cited in Morris, B. (ed.), The Taming of the Shrew, William Shakespeare, (Arden edition, London, 1981), p. 120.Google Scholar

57. Corbet, G., The Terrestial Mammals of Western Europe, (1966)Google Scholar, as cited in Morris, (ed.), The Taming, p. 121.Google Scholar

58. Roxburghe, II, 51, p. 509Google Scholar, lines 17–40, and Roxburghe, II, 407, p. 192Google Scholar, lines 25–32.

59. Roxburghe, II, 51, p. 509Google Scholar, lines 27–8.

60. Roxburghe, II, 407, p. 192Google Scholar, lines 31–2.

61. See, for example, Houlbrooke, Ralph, The English Family 1450–1700, (London, 1984), p. 100.Google Scholar

62. Roxburghe, II, 576, p. 188, line 13.Google Scholar

63. Roxburghe, II, 89, p. 636, line 13.Google Scholar

64. Roxburghe, II, 576, p. 189, lines 97–8.Google Scholar

65. ‘The Discontented Married Man’, Roxburghe, I, 96, 97, p. 298Google Scholar, lines 62–3, and for example, ‘The Cuckold's Lamentation of a Bad Wife’, Roxburghe, II, 89, p. 636Google Scholar, line 10.

66. Roxburghe, I, 96, 97, pp. 295–9.Google Scholar

67. Ibid., p. 298, lines 93–7.

68. Euing, no. 394, p. 658Google Scholar, lines 23–4.

69. See, Thomas, Keith, Religion and the Decline of Magic: Studies in Popular Beliefs in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century England, (Harmondsworth, 1971), p. 629.Google Scholar

70. ‘A Caution for Scolds’, Roxburghe, II, 51, p. 509Google Scholar, from line 39; ‘The Scolding Wife’, Roxburghe, II, 407, p. 193Google Scholar, lines 41–2.

71. McDonald, Michael, Mystical Bedlam – Madness, Anxiety and Healing in Seventeenth-Century England, (Cambridge, 1985), p. 126.Google Scholar

72. Roxburghe, II, 51, p. 509Google Scholar, line 47; p. 510, line 54.

73. Porter, Roy, Disease, Medicine and Society in England 1550–1860, (London, 1987), p. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

74. Porter, Roy, Mind-Forg'd Manacles – A History of Madness in England from the Restoration to the Regency. (Harmondsworth, 1987), p. 43.Google Scholar

75. Roxburghe, II, 51, p. 510Google Scholar, lines 59–60.

76. Thomas, , Religion and the Decline of Magic, pp. 633–4.Google Scholar

77. Roxburghe, II, 51, p. 510Google Scholar, lines 63–4.

78. McDonald, , Mystical Bedlam, p. 141.Google Scholar

79. Roburghe, II, 407, p. 193Google Scholar, line 56.

80. Ibid., lines 69–72.

81. Roxburghe, I, 354, 355, p. 415, line 17.Google Scholar

82. Ibid., p. 417, line 75; see also ‘A Caveat for Young-men’, Euing, No. 27, p. 37Google Scholar, 1st line of 5th stanza.

83. Roxburghe, I, 354, 355, pp. 417–8Google Scholar, lines 82–6.

84. ‘Hold your Hands, Honest Men!’ Roxburghe, I, 514, 515Google Scholar, title stanza, lines 5–6. For a general overview of contemporary attitudes towards wife beating see, Phillips, , Untying the Knot, pp. 97–100.Google Scholar

85. ‘The Married Man's Lesson’, Roxburghe, I, 510, 511, p. 235Google Scholar, lines 73–4.

86. Pepys, 58, p. 334Google Scholar, stanzas 6–7.

87. Roxburghe, I, 514, 515, p. 248Google Scholar, lines 125–30.

88. Roxburghe, I, 96, 97, p. 295Google Scholar, lines 3–7.

89. ibid., pp. 295–6, lines 10, 1, 11.

90. Ibid., p. 296, lines 19–20.

91. Ibid., lines 23–6.

92. Ibid., lines 31–3.

93. Ibid., pp. 296–7, lines 44–52.

94. Ibid., p. 297, line 54.

95. Ibid., p. 298, lines 62–3.

96. Ibid., lines 71–3.

97. Ibid., pp. 298–9, lines 89–106.

98. Hills, David Farley, The Comic in Renaissance Comedy, (London, 1981), p. 17.Google Scholar

99. Plato, , Laws, vii. 816Google Scholar, as cited in Bradbrook, M.C., The Growth and Structure of Elizabethan Comedy, (London, 1979), p. 28.Google Scholar