Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:35:53.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Small Things Forgotten: The Georgian World View, Material Culture and the Consumer Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2008

Paul Courtney
Paul Courtney
Affiliation:
Leicester, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The publication of The Art and Mystery of Historical Archaeology, a festschrift in honour of James Deetz, makes a useful starting point for assessing the remarkable development of American historical archaeology over the last four decades. The discipline of ‘historical archaeology’ is the New World equivalent of British post-medieval archaeology. It is the study of the material culture of colonial and industrial America. Unlike its highly marginalised British counterpart, the discipline has seen an enormous growth in America over the last two decades, reflected in the creation of numerous posts both in universities and public-sector archaeology. This article seeks firstly to discuss some of the main contributions to the festchrift and areas of promise for future research. Secondly it will assess the relevance of some recent contributions on the history of consumption to Deetz's concept of the ‘Georgian world view’ and the notion of radical change in eighteenth-century material culture.

Type
Review Articles
Information
Rural History , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , April 1996 , pp. 87 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Yentsch, A.E. and Beaudry, M.C., (eds.), The Art and Mystery of Historical Archaeology: Essays in Honor of James Deetz (Baton Rouge, 1992).Google Scholar

2. Harrington, J.C., ‘Archaeological explorations at Fort Raleigh national historic site’, North Carolina Historical Review 26ii (1949), 127–49Google Scholar; Cotter, J.L., Roberts, D.G. and Parrington, M., The Buried Past:An Archaeological History of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, 1992).Google Scholar Harrington's excavations at Jamestown are still unpublished but see Cotter, J.L., Archaeological Excavations at Jamestown, Virginia (Washington, 1958)Google Scholar, shortly to be reprinted.

3. Hume, I. Noël, Artifacts of Colonial America (New York, 1970).Google Scholar However, a major weakness in recent American as opposed to Canadian work is the relative lack of interest in fundamental artifact research; Deagan's, KathleenArtifacts of Spanish Colonies of Florida and the Caribbean, vol. 1; Ceramics, Glassware and Beads (Washington, 1987)Google Scholar is a notable exception.

4. Hume, I. Noël, Martin's Hundred (New York, 1982).Google Scholar The last decade has also seen a series of monographs on other early settlements along the James River including, Outlaw, A. C., Governor's Land (Richmond, 1990)Google Scholar; Kelso, W. M., Kingsmill Plantations 1619–80 (Orlando, 1984)Google Scholar and Deetz, J., Flowerdew Hundred (Richmond, 1993)Google Scholar though only the first is a technical excavation report on the British model with detailed information on artifacts and stratigraphy.

5. Deetz, J., In Small Things Forgotten: the Archaeology of Early American Life (Garden City, NY, 1977).Google Scholar

6. Glassie, H., Folk Housing of Middle Virginia: A Structural Study of Historical Artifacts (Knoxville, 1975)Google Scholar and Pattern in the Material Culture of the Eastern United States (Philadelphia, 1969)Google Scholar.

7. See also Deetz, J., ‘A cognitive historical model for American culture: 1620–1835’, in Moore, C.B., (ed.), Reconstructing Complex Societies (Cambridge, Mass., 1974), pp. 21–7Google Scholar and ‘Material Culture and World View in Colonial Anglo-America’, in Leone, M.P. and Potter, P.B., (eds.) The Recovery of Meaning: Historical Archaeology in the Eastern United States (Washington, 1988), pp. 219–35.Google Scholar

8. Leone, M.P., ‘Interpreting ideology in historical archaeology: using the rules of perspective in the William Paca garden, Annapolis, Maryland’, in Miller, D. and Tilly, C., (eds.), Ideology, Power and Prehistory (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar, is a classic illustration of the dominant ideology thesis. For a critique see Beaudry, M.C., Cook, L.J. and Mrozowski, S.A., ‘Artifacts and active voices: material culture as social discourse’, in McGuire, R.H. and Paynter, R., (eds.), The Archaeology of Inequality (London and Cambridge, Mass, 1991), pp. 150–90.Google Scholar

9. McKendrick, N., Brewer, J. and Plumb, J. H., The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialisation of Eighteenth-Century England (London, 1982).Google Scholar

10. See also Carson, G., Barka, N. F., Kelso, W. M., Stone, G.W. and Upton, D., ‘Impermanent architecture in the southern American colonies’, in Winterhur Portfolio 16 (2/3), 135–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Reprinted in George, R. Blair St., (ed.), Material Life in America 1600–1860 (Boston, 1988), 113–58.Google Scholar

11. Fischer, D. H., Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America (Oxford, 1989).Google Scholar On regional cultural differences in the English homeland see Underdown, D., Revel, Riot and Rebellion: Popular Politics and Culture in England 1603–1660 (Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar

12. Isaac, R., The Transformation of Virginia 1740–1790 (Chapel Hill, 1982), 34–9Google Scholar. See also Morgan, E. S., American Freedom, American Slavery: the Ordeal of Colonial Virginia (New York, 1975)Google Scholar and Kulikoff, A., Tobacco and Slaves: the Development of Southern Cultures in the Chesapeake 1680–1800 (Chapel Hill, 1986)Google Scholar on the emergence of a distinct slave-owning culture in Virginia and Maryland.

13. Deetz's antipathy to critical analysis, due to its Marxist roots, is stated explicitly in Flowerdew Hundred, p. 154.

14. Kelso, W., ‘In Big things remembered’, in Beaudry and Yentsch 1992, pp. 141–3.Google Scholar

15. Deetz's In Small Things Forgotten, emphasises examples of ethnic survivals while Upton, D., ‘White and Black landscapes of eighteenth century Virginia’, Places 2:ii (1985), 59–72 (reprinted in St. George, Material Life, pp. 357–70)Google Scholar is a useful analysis of power in the landscape. See also Singleton, T., (ed.), The Archaeology of Slavery and Plantation Life (Orlando, 1985).Google Scholar

16. Ferguson, L., Uncommon Ground: Archaeology and Early African America, 1650–1800 (Washington, 1992)Google Scholar and ‘Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina’, in McGuire, and Paynter, , Archaelogy of Inequality, pp. 28–39.Google Scholar

17. On the symbolic importance of decoration in African ceramics see Barley, N., Smashing Pots: Feats of Clay from Africa (London, 1994).Google Scholar

18. Dyer, C., Standards of Living in the Late Middle Ages (Cambridge, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Braudel, F., Capitalism and Civilisation 1500 to 1800: vol. 1. The Structures of Everyday Life (New York, 1981)Google Scholar; Barthlemy, D. and Contamine, P., ‘The use of private space’, in Duby, G. and Aries, P. (eds.), A History of Private Life, vol. 2. Revelations of the Medieval World (Cambridge, Mass., 1988), pp. 395–506Google Scholar; and Gaimster, D., ‘The archaeology of post-medieval society, c.1450–1750: material culture studies in Britain since the war’, in Vyner, B., (ed.), Building on the Past: papers celebrating 150 years of the Royal Archaeological Institute (London, 1994) pp. 283–312Google Scholar, provide useful background.

19. Alcock, N. W., People at Home: Living in a Warwickshire Village, 1500–1800 (Chichester, 1993)Google Scholar.

20. For example, Johnson, M., Housing Culture: Traditional Architecture in an English Landscape (London, 1993).Google Scholar

21. Vries, J. de, ‘Between purchasing power and the world of goods: understanding the household economy in early-modern Europe’, in Brewer, J. and Porter, R. (eds). Consumption and the World of Goods (London, 1993) pp. 85–132.Google Scholar

22. Douglass, M. and Isherwood, B., The World of Goods: towards an Anthropology of Consumption (London, 1978).Google Scholar

23. McKendrick, Brewer and Plumb, Birth of a Consumer Society.

24. Breen, T., ‘Baubles of Britain: the American and consumer revolutions of the eighteenth century’, Past and Present 119 (1983), 73–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar and ‘An empire of goods; the Anglicization of Colonial America, 1690–1776’, Journal of British Studies 25 (1986), 467–99.Google Scholar

25. Shammas, C., The Pre-industrial Consumer in England and America (Oxford, 1990).Google Scholar

26. For example, Wrigley, E.A., Continuity, Chance and Change: the Character of the Industrial Revolution in England (Cambridge, 1989).Google Scholar

27. Shammas, C., ‘Consumption from 1550 to 1800’, in Brewer, and Porter, , Consumption and the World of Goods, p. 191, pp. 177–205.Google Scholar

28. Maxine Berg's arguments on eighteenth-century technological change and economic growth are pertinent here. She rejects the revisionist model of slow continuous economic growth in eighteenth-century Britain and redefines the Industrial Revolution as a series of radical, but regionally-based, restructurings spread out over the whole of the eighteenth century: Berg, M., The Age of Manufactures, 1700–1820: Industry, Innovation and Work in Britain 2nd ed., (London, 1994).Google Scholar

29. Shammas, , Pre-Industrial Consumer, p. 299.Google Scholar

30. Weatherill, L., Consumer Behaviour and Material Culture in Britain 1660–1760 (London, 1988)Google Scholar and ‘The meaning of consumer behaviour in late 17th- and early 18th-century England’, in Brewer and Porter, Consumption and the World of Goods, pp. 206–27.Google Scholar

31. Martin, A. S., ‘The role of pewter as missing artifact: consumer attitudes towards tablewares in late 18th century Virginia’, Historical Archaeology 23:ii (1989), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32. Adams, W. H. and Boling, S. J., ‘Status and ceramics for planters and slaves on three Georgia coastal plantations’, Historical Archaeology 23:i (1989), 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. Wurst, L., ‘“Employees must be of moral and temperate habits”: rural and urban elite ideologies’, in McGuire and Paynter, Archaeology of Inequality, pp. 125–49.Google Scholar

34. Leone, M.P., ‘The Georgian order as the order of merchant capitalism in Annapolis, Maryland’, in Leone and Potter, Recovery of Meaning, pp. 235–61.Google Scholar