Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:32:41.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Environmental Effects of Blood Sports in Lowland England since 1750

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

ERIC L. JONES
ERIC L. JONES*
Affiliation:
Melbourne Business School, 200 Leicester Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia and University of Exeter, The Queen's Drive, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4QJ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers the effects of blood sports on the landscape, wildlife and farming, and assesses the implications of the topic for some matters of historical interpretation. Histories of individual sports written by practitioners are rarely candid about the environmental costs and even descriptions by professional historians tend to neglect the dynamic ecological consequences. Ritualised foxhunting supplanted more effective control and encouraged pests. Any benign consequences were incidental. Thanks to commercial money, shooting intensities held up well even during agricultural depressions. Game preservation, notably of pheasants, meant heavy pressure on birds of prey and other wild species; planting woodland was the main benign effect, although this simultaneously fostered so-called pests. Killing species that competed with game eliminated some wildlife but often proved self-defeating in the long term. Angling had mixed implications for waterside wildlife, although riverine habitats were lastingly modified when sport-fishing replaced fishing for food. Hunting and shooting meant some withdrawal of land from farming and interference with rotations: these activities reduced productivity. That the national economy could ‘afford’ to divert so many resources to elite sports contradicts the dominant view that England came up against a resources barrier.

Type
Research Article
Information
Rural History , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , April 2009 , pp. 51 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. McGregor, O. R., Introduction to the fifth edition of Lord Ernle, English Farming Past and Present (London, 1961), pp. cxliii–cxlivGoogle Scholar. I am grateful to J. L. Anderson and to members of the environmental history seminar at the Cornwall Campus of Exeter University for comments on this paper.

2. The forgotten pioneering author among the exceptions was Colin Tubbs. See his The New Forest: An Ecological History (Newton Abbot, 1968), several other books, and many articles.

3. I am drawn to the subject partly for reasons of my family's history, since I descend on one side from a line of gamekeepers and on the other from some notable poachers, about whom there is a certain amount of documentation. Further mention of them is nevertheless excluded at the behest of referees. There seemed to me, however, solid grounds for having alluded to them in the first draft. A personal approach offers immediacy and authenticity; acts as a focusing device that reduces the scatter of examples without eliminating their diversity; and humanises writing along the lines of personal notes familiar from the work of landscape historians like W. G. Hoskins or Maurice Beresford. Oral history and family history are respectable nowadays and have been harnessed to broad ends. Whether or not Ralph Waldo Emerson was correct in saying that all history is biography, the method is prevalent, few court cases proceed without personal testimony, and business history, at least, commonly relies on interviews. It seems illogical to be able to refer to others’ ancestors but not one's own and the reader should understand that mine are present here in the background. The alternative pretends to an implausibly ‘scientific’ detachment.

4. Insofar as my interest goes beyond the historical it is influenced by a lifetime as a naturalist. I do not, however, belong to any conservation organisation.

5. Occasional supporters have long admitted the involvement of cruelty. Thus ‘Ardaros’ began an article on ‘Cruelty in Sport’ in the Shooting Times, 30th November 1918, with the pronouncement that, ‘A certain amount of cruelty in sport is, I am afraid, unavoidable, but all true sportsmen will as much as possible try to minimise such cruelty.’ (Shooting Times & Country Magazine, 125 Years of Shooting Times 1882–2007 (London, 2007), pp. 29–30). The continued frequency of ‘runners’ (wounded pheasants) shows that his admonitions have not been closely followed. And if the jury is still out regarding whether fish feel pain, it would surely be logical to refrain from sport angling until the issue has been decided.

6. As shown by Hayter, Tony, F. M. Halford and the Dry-Fly Revolution (London, 2002)Google Scholar.

7. Hoffman, Richard C., Fishers' Craft and Lettered Art: Tracts on Fishing from the End of the Middle Ages (Toronto, 1997), p. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8. The most systematic is Collins, Tony et al. , eds., Encyclopedia of Traditional British Rural Sports (London, 2005)Google Scholar.

9. For exceptions see Currie, C. K., ‘Landscape and Fishing Rod’, Hampshire Field Club and Archaeological Society Newsletter 36 (2001), 12–14Google Scholar, and Roger Wells, who claims to have caught and introduced a pike into the trout stream of someone who had refused him permission to fish (‘Historical Trajectories’, Southern History, 25 (2003), 203).

10. Hoyle, R. W., ed., Our Hunting Fathers: Field Sports in England after 1850 (Lancaster, 2007), p. 7Google Scholar.

11. Colonel Peter Hawker is known as ‘the father of English wildfowling’ and regularly cited in works on that subject. See Peter Hawker, The Diary of Colonel Peter Hawker 1802–1853 (London, 1988), 2 vols. I have examined Hawker's original diaries in the Beineke Library at Yale; they contain further evidence of scarcely discriminating slaughter. For the Trevelyan reference, see Deakin, Roger, Wild Wood: A Journey Through Trees (London, 2007), p. 266Google Scholar. The marquess of Ripon is renowned for the maximum slaughter of gamebirds. His lifetime bag is cited in so many works on shooting that specific references would be otiose, like (to cite the classic historiographical instance) offering a citation for the murder of Thomas a’ Beckett.

12. Turner, W. S., All Heaven in a Rage (London, 1964), p. 176Google Scholar. This is the locus classicus of animal welfare.

13. I am indebted to Dr. Kris Allerfeldt of the University of Exeter for a discussion of the differences.

14. Rosalind Hill, cited in Hume, C. W., The Status of Animals in the Christian Religion (London [1956]), p. 31Google Scholar

15. As they remain. This is made plain by Pincher, Chapman, Pastoral Symphony (Shrewsbury, 1993)Google Scholar. Marr, Andrew, A History of Modern Britain (London, 2007), vol. 1, pp. 181Google Scholar, 305, indicates how central shooting was during Macmillan's premiership.

16. Veblen, Thorstein, Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution (London, 1995 [originally published 1915]), p. 142Google Scholar.

17. Payn, William, Oh Happy Countryman – A Suffolk Memoir (Lewes, 1994), pp. 15Google Scholar, 103.

18. W. M. S. Russell, cited in Hume, Status of Animals, p. 84

19. Fisher, John, ‘Property Rights in Pheasants: Landlords, Farmers and the Game Laws, 1860–1880’, Rural History, 11:2 (2000), 165–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20. Pell, A., ‘The Making of the Land in England: A Retrospect’, Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, 2 Series, 23 (1887), 355–74Google Scholar.

21. Greater realism has been introduced more recently, e.g. by Williamson, Tom and Bellamy, Liz, Property and Landscape (London, 1987)Google Scholar.

22. Jones, E. L., ‘Enclosure, Land Improvement, and the Price of Capital’, Explorations in Economic History, 27 (1990), 355CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23. Some present-day vegetation patterns do act as markers for previous land use. See e.g. Jones, E. L. and Tubbs, C. R., ‘Vegetation of Sites of Previous Cultivation in the New Forest’, Nature, 198 (1963), 977–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and ‘The Distribution of Gorse (Ulex europaeus L.) in the New Forest in Relation to Former Land Use’, Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club and Archaeological Society, XXIII (1964), 1–10.

24. Quoted in Horn, Pamela, High Society: The English Social Elite, 1880–1914 (Stroud, 1992), pp. 138–139Google Scholar.

25. Finch, Jonathan, ‘“Grass, Grass, Grass”: Fox-hunting and the Creation of the Modern Landscape’, Landscapes, 5:2 (2004), 41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26. See e.g. Porter, Valerie, Tales of the Old Woodlanders (London, 1994), pp. 119Google Scholar, 135.

27. Griffin, Emma, Blood Sport: Hunting in Britain since 1066 (New Haven, 2007), p. 123Google Scholar.

28. Hastings, Max, Scattered Shots (London, 1999), p. 49Google Scholar.

29. Quoted in Beach, William Hicks, A Cotswold Family: Hicks and Hicks Beach (London, 1909), p. 335Google Scholar.

30. Orr, John, Agriculture in Oxfordshire: A Survey (Oxford, 1916), p. 31Google Scholar.

31. Osborne, Harvey and Winstanley, Michael, ‘Rural and Urban Poaching in Victorian England’, Rural History 17:2 (2006), 187–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32. Horn, High Society, p. 130.

33. Rackham, Oliver, Ancient Woodland: Its History, Vegetation and Uses in England (London, 1980), p. 83Google Scholar.

34. Jones, E. L., ‘Reconstructing Former Bird Communities’, Forth Naturalist and Historian 6 (1981), 101–6Google Scholar.

35. Boyd, A. W., A Country Parish: Great Budworth in the County of Chester (London, 1951), p. 10Google Scholar.

36. Lovegrove, Roger, Silent Fields: The Long Decline of a Nation's Wildlife (Oxford, 2007)Google Scholar.

37. Ibid. p. 214.

38. Stevens, Joseph, A Parochial History of St. Mary Bourne (London, 1888), p. 244Google Scholar. St. Mary Bourne may be an anomaly in other respects, since the parish paid for foxes killed in four of its nine contiguous parishes and one that was two parishes distant. This calls into question Lovegrove's treatment of the vermin accounts of each parish separately. His totals for St. Mary Bourne and the one contiguous parish he mentions are far lower than Stevens’ figures.

39. Quoted by Douglas Anderson, ‘Noyfull Fowles and Vermyn: Parish Payments for Killing Wildlife in Hampshire 1533–1863’, Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club and Archaeological Society (Hampshire Studies 2005), 60 (2005), 221.

40. Aesop, , Sporting Reminiscences of Hampshire from 1745 to 1862 (London, 1864), p. 194CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41. Boyd, Country Parish, p. 97. Lovegrove also concludes that during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries the fox population was lower than it is today (Silent Fields, p. 211).

42. Griffin, Blood Sport, pp. 137, 168.

43. Ibid. p. 3.

44. Trench, C. C., A History of Poaching and Game Preservation in England (London, 1967), p. 136Google Scholar, quoting Gentleman's Magazine, 1804.

45. Evans, G. E., The Leaping Hare (London, 1972), pp. 73–74Google Scholar; Tegner, Henry, Wild Hares (London, 1969), p. 87Google Scholar.

46. Jones, E. L., ‘Birds and Land-Use in North-West Hampshire’, in Cohen, Edwin, ed., Birds of Hampshire and the Isle of Wight (Edinburgh, 1963), pp. 23–29Google Scholar, and ‘The Lambourn Downs’, in Radford, M. C. (ed.), The Birds of Berkshire and Oxfordshire (London, 1966), pp. 16–24Google Scholar.

47. See for example Holloway, Simon, The Historical Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland 1875–1900 (London, 1996)Google Scholar, which analyses county avifaunas and other reports.

48. These effects were characteristic; the particular list comes from Boyd, Country Parish, p. 10, writing about Cheshire.

49. For the inverse relationship of game preservation and the buzzard's distribution, see Moore, N. W., The Bird of Time (Cambridge, 1987), pp. 130–131Google Scholar. See also maps of the distribution of the buzzard at various dates and the reproduction of Moore's maps in Tubbs, Colin R., The Buzzard (Newton Abbot, 1974)Google Scholar.

50. A convenient illustration is in Lovegrove, Silent Fields, p. 212.

51. Jefferies, Richard, The Life of the Fields (Oxford, 1983 [first edition 1884]), pp. 65–69Google Scholar.

52. Stevens, Parochial History, p. 252.

53. See e.g. Joyce, H. S., I Was Born in the Country (London, 1946), p. 109Google Scholar.

54. Hoffman, Fishers’ Craft, p. 351.

55. http://www.midcurrent.com

56. Jefferies, Life of the Fields, pp. 170–4.

57. Lunn, Mick, A Particular Lunn (London, 1990), pp. 121Google Scholar, 123.

58. Hayter, F. M. Halford, p. 166.

59. On modern gamekeeping practice see Porter, Tales of the Old Woodlanders pp. 119, 135, quoting a keeper from Berkshire and a forestry worker from Sussex.

60. E.g. Barratt, Hugh, A Good Living (Ipswich, 2000), pp. 223Google Scholar, 250, 258.

61. See e.g. Griffin, Blood Sport, p. 136.

62. Stead, David R., ‘Risk and Risk Management in English Agriculture, c.1750–1850’, Economic History Review, LVII (2), 2004, especially p. 358Google Scholar.

63. Prince, H. C., Parks in England (Shalfleet, I.O.W., 1967), pp. 7Google Scholar, 9.

64. Hoyle also makes the point about productivity, Our Hunting Fathers, p. 9.

65. Pomeranz, Kenneth, The Great Divergence (Princeton, N.J., 2000)Google Scholar.

66. Harvey Osborne, in Hoyle (ed.), Our Hunting Fathers, pp. 187–197, speaking mainly of salmon fishing.

67. Looker, Samuel J. (ed.), Richard Jefferies, Chronicles of the Hedges (London, 1948), p. 68Google Scholar.

68. ‘Bloodsports are Saving the Countryside’, The Economist 18th November 2006.

69. Jones, Eric L., ‘The Land that Richard Jefferies Inherited’, Rural History, 16:1 (2005), 88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70. Edward Bujak in Hoyle (ed.), Our Hunting Fathers, p. 95.

71. See e.g. Wilson, R. H., Just for a Lark (Abingdon, 1970), p. 55Google Scholar. These otherwise excluded groups had always wished to shoot and fish. Hawker observed in the depression year 1816 that, around the towns, birds were ‘contended for by half the lawyers, doctors, schoolmasters, sporting parsons and tradesmen in the place.’ (Quoted by Turner, All Heaven in a Rage, p. 102).

72. Moody, R., ‘Heraldry and Hostelries: The Evidence for Wiltshire’, Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Magazine, 99 (2006), 221–9Google Scholar.

73. Basu, Kaushik et al. , ‘The Growth and Decay of Custom: The Role of the New Institutional Economics in Economic History’, Explorations in Economic History, 24 (1987), 12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74. Lord Eliot was reserving the right to hawk alongside rights to hunt and fish in leases of his estate at Latton, Wiltshire, as late as 1812. (Cornwall Record Office EL/813).

75. Reproduced in Hoyle (ed.), Our Hunting Fathers, p. 20.

76. Hastings, Max, Country Fair (London, 2005), p. 250Google Scholar.