Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:29:05.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Access to Mountains Act 1939: An Essay in Compromise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2010

JOHN SHEAIL
JOHN SHEAIL*
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (Natural Environment Research Council) Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Access to Mountains Act of 1939 has been ridiculed for the most part as a capitulation to landed interests. Closer reconstruction of the circumstances in which such a legislative attempt was made to extend the public recreational-use of uncultivated countryside emphasises the severe limitations of a Private Members’ Bill. Even greater skills were called for in securing sufficient consensus among the various parliamentary lobbies to convince ministers that there was sufficient accord to merit the use of legislative time and resources to expedite enactment. The Act's achievement was to ratchet forward both ramblers’ expectations and a greater preparedness on the part of landed interests to provide the recreational opportunity anticipated by a post-war, largely urban population.

Type
Research Article
Information
Rural History , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , April 2010 , pp. 59 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. A. and M. MacEwen, National Parks (London, 1982), pp. xi-xiv; MacEwen, M., The Greening of the Red (London, 1991), pp. 274–6Google Scholar; Ravenscroft, N., ‘New Access Initiatives’, in Watkins, C., ed., Rights of Way (London, 1996), p. 45Google Scholar.

2. Halifax, Lord, Fulness of Days (London, 1957), p. 11Google Scholar.

3. Hammond, B., ‘The Battle for Open Spaces’, in J. A. K. Thompson and A.J. Toynbee, Essays in Honour of Gilbert Murray (London, 1936), p. 119Google Scholar; Hammond, J.L., The Growth of Common Enjoyment (Oxford, 1933)Google Scholar.

4. Joad, C. E. M., A Charter for Ramblers, or the Future of the Countryside (London, 1934)Google Scholar; Joad, C.E.M., The Untutored Townsman's Invasion of the Country (London, 1946)Google Scholar.

5. Stephenson, T., Forbidden Land: The Struggle for Access to Mountain and Moorland (Manchester, 1989)Google Scholar; Hill, H., Freedom to Roam: The Struggle for Access to Britain's Moors and Mountains (Ashbourne, 1980)Google Scholar; Taylor, H., A Claim on the Countryside: A History of the British Outdoor Movement (Keele, 1997)Google Scholar.

6. Theakston, K., Leadership in Whitehall (Basingstoke, 1999), pp. 6–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. The National Archives (TNA), HO 45, 18382.

8. Joad, A Charter, pp. 13–4.

9. The Ramblers’ Federation Yearbook 1934.

10. Baronowski, S., Strength through Joy (Cambridge, 2004)Google Scholar.

11. Cherry, G. E., Environmental Planning. Volume II. National Parks and Recreation in the Countryside (London, 1975), p. 18Google Scholar.

12. Reading University, Special Collections Search Room (RU), CLA, AD1/11, 17th November 1938.

13. Journal of the Commons, Open Spaces and Footpaths Preservation Society,

VI(1), January 1939, 9–11.

14. E. Baigent, ‘Sir Lawrence Wensley Chubb’, New Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, 11, p. 566; Hill, Freedom to Roam, pp. 80–1.

15. RU, Central Landowners’ Association, AD1/11, 17th November 1938.

16. TNA, CAB 23, 96 Cabinet 57 (38), concl. 19; Pugh, P.M., ‘Arthur Creech Jones’, New Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, 30, pp. 443–5Google Scholar.

17. Parliamentary Debates, Commons Committee, 1938–39, Standing Committees A and B (PD Commons Committee), 1473–4.

18. Bromhead, P.A., Private Members’ Bills in the British Parliament (London, 1956)Google Scholar; Norton, P., The Commons in Perspective (Oxford, 1981), pp. 99–102Google Scholar.

19. RU, CLA, AD1/31, 24th November 1938.

20. Parliamentary Debates (PD), Commons, 342, 963–70; Bromhead, Private Members’ Bills, p. 25.

21. PD, Commons, 342, 755–63.

22. PD, Commons, 342, 747–55.

23. PD, Commons, 342, 792–800.

24. PD, Commons, 342, 817–20.

25. PD, Commons, 342, 808–11 and 820–3.

26. PD Commons Committee, 1461–8.

27. Where not otherwise indicated, data are drawn from the National Archives, TNA HO 45, 18382 and MAF 48, 48724. There is much duplication of material between the two references.

28. Chubb, L., ‘The Access to Mountains Act 1939: Its History and Significance’, Journal of the Commons, Open Spaces and Footpaths Society, 6:5 (1939), 129–36Google Scholar.

29. PD, Commons, 342, 753 and 819.

30. RU, Central Landowners’ Association AD1/11, 16th February 1939.

31. TNA, CAB 24, 284, CP.57 (39).

32. RU, Central Landowners’ Association, AD1/11, 27th April 1939.

33. TNA, CAB 23, 97; PD Commons Committee, 1468–73; PD Commons 346, 750–1.

34. PD Lords 112, 969–76, 986–7 and 992.

35. PD Lords 112, 980–2.

36. PD Lords 112, 976–80 and 987–9.

37. Hill, Freedom to Roam, p. 79.

38. PD Commons Committee, 1571–4.

39. PD Commons Committee, 1574, 1578 and 1581–2.

40. PD, Commons Committee 1575–7; PD Commons 346, 751.

41. PD, Commons 346, 741–6.

42. Cherry, Environmental Planning, p. 24; PD Lords 113, 261–6.

43. RU, CLA, AD1/31, 8th and 22nd June 1939.

44. Access to Mountains Act (2 & 3 George 6), c 30, Section 8(2).

45. PD Lords 112, 993–4, and 113, 279–81.

46. PD Commons Committee, 1473–4 and 1477–9; PD Commons 346, 751–3.

47. Cherry, Environmental Planning, p. 25.

48. TNA, MAF 48, 478.

49. Minister of Works and Planning, Report of the Committee on Land Utilisation in Rural Areas (London, 1942, Cmd 6378), paragraph 175; Sheail, J., ‘Scott Revisited: Post-War Agriculture, Planning and the British Countryside’, Journal of Rural Studies, 13 (1997), 387–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50. TNA, MAF 48, 665; Winter, M., Rural Politics (London, 1996), pp. 102–5Google Scholar.

51. B. Short, C. Watkins and J. Martin, eds, The Front Line of Freedom: British Farming in the Second World War, Agricultural History Review Supplement Series 4, 2006.

52. Cullingworth, J. B., Environmental Planning. Volume I. Reconstruction and Land Use Planning 1939–1947 (London, 1975), 72–3Google Scholar

53. Cherry, Environmental Planning, p. 27: Sheail, J., Nature in Trust: The History of Nature Conservation in Britain (Glasgow, 1976), pp. 90–9Google Scholar.

54. Sheail, J., ‘John Dower, National Parks and Town and Country Planning in Britain’, Planning Perspectives 10, 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Minister of Town and Country Planning, National Parks in England and Wales (London, 1945), Cmd 6628.

55. Dower, J., ‘Holiday Use of Countryside and Coastline’, Journal of the Royal Institute of British Architects, 50 (1943), pp. 181–4Google Scholar.

56. Minister of Town and Country Planning, Footpaths and Access to the Countryside: Report of the Special Committee (England and Wales) (London, 1947), 7207.

57. PD, Commons 463, 1478–80 and 1586–98.

58. Parker, G., ‘Countryside Access and the Right to Roam under New Labour: Nothing to CROW About?’ in Woods, M., ed., New Labour's Countryside: Rural Policy in Britain since 1997 (Bristol, 2008), pp. 142–3Google Scholar.

59. TNA, HO 45, 18382.

60. The author is indebted to Dr Jeremy Burchardt for providing the original pretext for writing the paper, the anonymous referees for their constructive comments, and the assistance of the Official Papers Room, Cambridge University Library, The National Archives, and the Special Collections Service, Reading University.