Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:42:41.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Landscape, Agriculture and the Rural Economy of Hockley, Essex, 1840–1916

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2015

STEPHEN MURRAY
STEPHEN MURRAY*
Affiliation:
Independent scholar [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article examines the local economy of a parish in south-east Essex during a period when economic, social and technological factors were transforming rural Britain. Record linkages are used to construct a microhistory of Hockley to analyse the exploitation of the landscape and rural livelihoods. Agricultural and occupational change reflected many national economic and social influences, but there are also counter examples to regional patterns of farming practice and large scale agrarian capitalist landownership. The agricultural depression of c.1875–96 effected a shift from arable to livestock farming and the development of market gardening facilitated by the railway. A reduction in agricultural employment opportunities, and the absence of a cottage industry for women, led to a significant out-migration of working-age people. The microhistory demonstrates that local factors, such as access to a tidal river, the timing of the arrival of the railway, the availability of brick-making clay and new trades provided livelihood opportunities and influenced the structure and operation of the rural economy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Rural History , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , October 2015 , pp. 201 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Grigg, D., English Agriculture: An Historical Perspective (Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar; Armstrong, W. A., ‘The Countryside’ in Thompson, F. M. L., ed., The Cambridge Social History of Britain 1750–1950, Volume 1 (Cambridge, 1993)Google Scholar; Perren, R., Agriculture in Depression, 1870–1940 (Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar

2. Reay, B., Microhistories: Demography, Society and Culture in Rural England (Cambridge, 1996), p. 258.Google Scholar

3. Godfrey, J. and Short, B., ‘The Ownership, Occupation and Use of Land on the South Downs, 1840–1940: A Methodological Analysis of Record Linkage Over Time’, Agricultural History Review, 49:1 (2001), 56–78 Google Scholar. Godfrey and Short use tithe maps and apportionments, the valuation office survey of 1910–15 and the National Farm Survey of 1941–43.

4. Godfrey and Short, in ‘Ownership’, 64, caution that analysing tithe material on a parish by parish basis has the disadvantage that land ownership, occupation and farming enterprise may overlap parish boundaries and may therefore not give an accurate picture of each unit of ownership. For example, in this study two farms in Hockley have been identified which extend into adjacent parishes and several landowners held land across a wider area.

5. Wild, T., Village England: A Social History of the Countryside (London, 2004), p. 88 Google Scholar.

6. Rackham, O., The Ancient Woodland of England: The Woods of South-East Essex (Rochford, 1986), pp. 14–25 Google Scholar.

7. Ibid., p. 109.

8. Hunter, J., The Essex Landscape: A Study of its Form and History (Chelmsford, 1999), p. 22 Google Scholar; Grigg, English Agriculture, pp. 32–4.

9. English Heritage, Heritage Gateway, ‘Hockley: Peach's Brick Works’, SMR No.15533.

10. Essex Record Office (hereafter ERO), Hockley Tithe Apportionment, D/CT 181A.

11. Hunter, The Essex Landscape, p. 63.

12. Richardson, T. L., ‘Agricultural Labourers' Wages and the Cost of Living in Essex, 1790–1840: A Contribution to the Standard of Living Debate’, in Holderness, B. A. and Turner, M., eds, Land, Labour and Agriculture, 1700–1920 (London, 1991), pp. 70–71 Google Scholar.

13. Murphy, P., Heppell, E. and Brown, N., ‘The Archaeology of the Essex Coast’, Transactions of the Essex Society for Archaeology and History, Fourth series, 3 (2012), 147–8Google Scholar. Farm leases in the eighteenth and nineteenth century often specify that the lessees should spread chalk on the land to improve it. See ERO, D/DSp/T73/17 and D/DMa/T37.

14. ERO, Tithe Commissioners Papers for Hockley, D/DOp/B39/44/1.

15. Hunt, E. H. and Pam, S. J., ‘Managerial Failure in Late Victorian Britain? Land Use and English Agriculture’, Economic History Review, 54:2 (2001), 241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16. Ibid., 263.

17. Wild, Village England, pp. 70–90.

18. Grigg, English Agriculture, pp. 178–89.

19. B. A. Holderness, ‘The Origins of High Farming’, in Holderness and Turner, Land, Labour and Agriculture, p. 151.

20. ERO, An Inventory & Valuation Plumboro Mount Farm 2nd July 1840, D/DOp/B68.

21. The population of Greater London, 36 miles from Hockley, had more than doubled from 2,235,000 in 1841 to 4,767,000 in 1881.

22. Until 1917 the agricultural returns (TNA, MAF 68) were voluntary, and there were no penalties for false returns, so data may be missing, or wary farmers may have under-reported their holdings (see TNA, Domestic Records Information 59 Agricultural Statistics, 2008).

23. Armstrong, A., Farmworkers: A Social and Economic History, 1770–1980 (London, 1988), p. 110 Google Scholar.

24. Perren, Agriculture in Depression, pp. 8–9.

25. Brown, A. F. J., Meagre Harvest (Chelmsford, 1990), p. 77 Google Scholar.

26. Hunt, E. H. and Pam, S. J., ‘Responding to Agricultural Depression, 1873–96: Managerial Success, Entrepreneurial Failure?’, Agricultural History Review, 50:2 (2002), 227–9Google Scholar.

27. Brown, Meagre Harvest, p. 77.

28. Hunt and Pam, ‘Responding to Agricultural Depression’, 229.

29. In their study of the Sussex Downs, Godfrey and Short state that ‘by 1910 much of the high arable of 1875 had returned to grass’, Godfrey and Short ‘Ownership’, 96.

30. Victoria County History Essex, Volume 2, p. 341 quoted in P. Wormell, Essex Farming 1900–2000 (Colchester, 1999), p. 214.

31. Hunt and Pam, ‘Managerial Failure’, 256.

32. Wormell, Essex Farming, p. 212.

33. Hunt and Pam, ‘Managerial Failure’, p. 256; Hunt, E. H. and Pam, S. J., ‘Agricultural Depression in England, 1873–96: Skills Transfer and the “redeeming Scots”’, Agricultural History Review, 29:1 (2011), 89–90 Google Scholar.

34. Perren, Agriculture in Depression, p. 13.

35. Ibid., p. 7.

36. Wormell, Essex Farming, p. 22.

37. Perren, Agriculture in Depression, p. 8.

38. Hunt, E. H. and Pam, S. J., ‘Prices and Structural Response in English Agriculture, 1873–1896’, Economic History Review, 50:3 (1997), 486–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39. Hunt and Pam, ‘Responding to Agricultural Depression’, 231–3.

40. Brown, Meagre Harvest, p. 226.

41. Kelly's Directory of Essex (1902), p. 232; (1908), pp. 282–3; (1910), pp. 288–9; Kelly's Directory of Essex, Hertfordshire and Middlesex (1914), p. 313.

42. ERO, Sales catalogue Hockley Hall farm, Wadham Park farm, Shepherd's farm and a brick, tile and pottery works at Hullbridge dated 25th November 1903, D/DS 23/14.

43. Hunt and Pam, ‘Agricultural Depression’, 97.

44. ERO, Hockley Tithe Apportionment, D/CT 181A.

45. Shaw-Taylor, L., ‘Family Farms and Capitalist Farms in Mid Nineteenth-Century England’, Agricultural History Review, 53:2 (2005), 158 Google Scholar.

46. On the Sussex Downs, forty per cent of the land was in the hands of the three largest land owners in 1840: Godfrey and Short, ‘Ownership’, 70. This was not the case in Hockley.

47. Shaw-Taylor, L., ‘The Rise of Agrarian Capitalism and the Decline of Family Farming in England’, Economic History Review, 65:1 (2012)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, 34.

48. Ibid., 57.

49. Ibid., 51.

50. Ibid., 53.

51. Capitalist farms may be associated with good soils and intensive cultivation and family farms with poor soils and less intensive agriculture, Ibid., 35. The difficulty of working the London clay of Hockley may be a factor here.

52. Higgs, E., A Clearer Sense of the Census: The Victorian Censuses and Historical Research (London, 1996), p. 98 Google Scholar.

53. Grigg, English Agriculture, pp. 149–66; Woods, R., The Population of Britain in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, 1995), p. 23 Google Scholar.

54. David Grigg notes that in 1908 only seven per cent of British farms had any stationary engines: Grigg, English Agriculture, p. 121.

55. Caunce, S. A., ‘Mechanisation and Society in English Agriculture: The Experience of the North-East, 1850–1914’, Rural History, 17:1 (2006), 36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56. Brown, Meagre Harvest, p. 79.

57. Derelict land in Essex, including Hockley, in 1894 is shown in the maps in the Royal Commission Report on the Agricultural depression. Brown notes that in 1882 at least 36,000 acres of farmland in Essex was tenantless, Brown, Meagre Harvest, pp. 78–9.

58. Wild, Village England, p. 107.

59. Crompton, C. A., ‘Changes in Rural Service Occupations during the Nineteenth Century: An Evaluation of Two Sources for Hertfordshire, England’, Rural History, 6:2 (1995), 201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60. F. M. L. Thompson, ‘An Anatomy of English Agriculture, 1870–1914’ in Holderness and Turner, Land, Labour and Agriculture, pp. 216–17.

61. Wild, Village England, p. 108.

62. Crompton, ‘Changes in Rural Service Occupations’, 199.

63. Kelly's Directory of Essex (1910), pp. 288–9.

64. In 1851 there were an estimated 535,000 horses in London, see Waller, P., The English Urban Landscape (Oxford, 2000), p. 210 Google Scholar.

65. ERO, Sales catalogue Hockley Hall farm, Wadham Park farm, Shepherd's farm and a brick, tile and pottery works at Hullbridge dated 25th November 1903, D/DS 23/14. The brickworks were disused by 1924.

66. Verdon, , Rural Women Workers in Nineteenth Century England: Gender, Work and Wages (Woodbridge, 2002), p. 196 Google Scholar.

67. Sharpe, P., ed., Women's Work: The English Experience 1650–1914 (London, 1998), p. 24 Google Scholar.

68. Higgs, A Clearer Sense, pp. 97–8.

69. Verdon, N., ‘“subjects deserving of the highest praise”: Farmers' Wives and the Farm Economy in England, c.1700–1850’, Agricultural History Review, 51:1 (2003), 39 Google Scholar.

70. Shaw-Taylor, L., ‘Diverse Experiences: The Geography of Adult Female Employment in England and the 1851 Census’ in Goose, N., ed., Women's Work in Industrial England: Regional and Local Perspectives (Hatfield, 2007), p. 39 Google Scholar.

71. The female participation rate in 1921 for Rochford Rural District (encompassing Hockley) was 21.7 per cent, typical of rural Essex. The range of female participation rates for fifteen rural districts in Essex from the Census Summary for Essex (1921) ranged from nineteen to twenty-seven per cent.

72. Brown, Meagre Harvest, p. 156

73. Ulyatt, D. J., ‘Female Agricultural Labour on the Dixon Estate, Lincolnshire, 1801–17, Agricultural History Review, 54:1 (2006), 89 Google Scholar.

74. Anderson, M., ‘Households, Families and Individuals: Some Preliminary Results from the National Sample from the 1851 Census of Great Britain’, Continuity and Change, 3 (1988), 427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

75. Straw plaiting was common in north-west Essex until the late 1870s when imported straw and technical changes in manufacturing led to a collapse of the industry, see Brown, Meagre Harvest, p. 121. Pamela Sharpe has argued that straw plaiting was a very localised occupation and coincided with women's ‘traditional springtime activities of weeding and planting in the arable fields’, Sharpe, P., ‘The Women's Harvest: Straw-plaiting and the Representation of Labouring Women's Employment, c.1793–1885’, Rural History, 5:2 (1994), 134–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Verdon, Rural Women Workers, Chapter 5.

76. Verdon, Rural Women Workers, p. 43.

77. Burnette, J., ‘Married with Children: The Family Status of Female Day-Labourers at Two South-Western Farms’, Agricultural History Review, 55:1 (2007), 75–94 Google Scholar.

78. Saito, O., ‘Who Worked When? Lifetime Profiles of Labour-force Participation in Cardington and Corfe Castle in the Late-Eighteenth and Mid-Nineteenth Centuries’ in Mills, D. R. and Schürer, K., eds, Local Communities in the Victorian Census Enumerators' Books (Oxford, 1996), pp. 192–3Google Scholar.

79. Best, G., Mid-Victorian Britain 1851–75 (London, 1979), p. 174 Google Scholar.

80. Woods, Population of Britain, p. 43.

81. Armstrong, Farmworkers, pp. 117–18.

82. Brown, Meagre Harvest, p. 79.

83. Hunt and Pam, ‘Agricultural Depression’, 82, 100.

84. Nair, G. and Poyner, D., ‘The Flight from the Land? Rural Migration in South-East Shropshire in the Late Nineteenth Century’, Rural History, 17:2 (2006), 184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

85. C. Rawding, ‘Village Type and Employment Structure: An Analysis in the Nineteenth-Century Lincolnshire Wolds’, in Mills and Schürer, eds, Local Communities, pp. 419–20.