No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2010
Once upon a time, there was a consensus in this country that the welfare state was the jewel in the crown of the post-war settlement. It was a national badge of moral worth. It was held to embody certain virtues that people told themselves were the hallmark of a civilised society: altruism, equity, dignity, fellowship. It defined Britain as a co-operative exercise which bound us together into a cohesive society. Or so we told ourselves.
1 Pinker, Robert, ‘New Liberalism and the Middle Way’ in Page, Robert M. and Silburn, Richard L.: ‘British Social Welfare in the 20th Century’, (Macmillan Press, 1999).Google Scholar
2 Harris, Jose, ‘Contract’ and ‘Citizenship’, in Marquand, David and Seldon, Anthony (eds), The Ideas That Shaped Post-War Britain, (London: Fontana, 1996).Google Scholar
3 Deacon, Alan, ‘Re-reading Titmuss: Moralism, Work and Welfare’, University of Leeds Review, 36 (1993).Google Scholar
4 ibid. Robinson, Simon, ‘Tawney's Theory of Equality’ unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1989.Google Scholar
5 Field, Frank, Stakeholder Welfare (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1996).Google Scholar
6 Dennis, Norman, The Invention of Permanent Poverty (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1997).Google Scholar
7 Skidelsky, Robert, Beyond the Welfare State (London: Social Market Foundation, 1997).Google Scholar
8 Dennis, The Invention of Permanent Poverty.
9 ibid.
10 Income and Wealth: Report of the JRF Inquiry Group (London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1995).Google Scholar
11 Field, Stakeholder Welfare and Skidelsky, Beyond the Welfare State.
12 Sacks, Jonathan, The Persistence of Faith (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1991).Google Scholar