Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:06:34.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Structure of Orthonomy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Michael Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

According to the standard story of action, a story that can be traced back at least to David Hume (1740), actions are those bodily movements that are caused and rationalized by a pair of mental states: a desire for some end, where ends can be thought of as ways the world could be, and a belief that something the agent can just do, namely, move her body in the way to be explained, has some suitable chance of making the world the relevant way. Bodily movements that occur otherwise aren't actions, they are mere happenings (Davidson 1963, Davidson 1971).

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 55 , September 2004 , pp. 165 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arpaly, Nomy 2000: ‘On Acting Rationally against One's Best Judgment’ in Ethics, 110, 488–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan 1974: ‘The conscience of Huckleberry Finn’ in Philosophy, 49, 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, Simon 1998: Ruling Passions (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christman, John. 1989: ed., The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan 1993: Moral Reasons (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan 2000: Practical Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur C. 1963: ‘What We Can Do’, Journal of Philosophy, 60, 434–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald 1963: ‘Actions, Reasons and Causes’ reprinted in his Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer 1980: Actions (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Hume, David 1740: A Treatise of Human Nature (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Jones, Karen 2003: ‘Emotion, weakness of will, and the normative conception of agency’ in Anthony, Hatzimoysis, ed, Philosophy and the Emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine 1986: ‘Skepticism about Practical Reason’, Journal of Philosophy, 83, 5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclntyre, Alison 1990: ‘Is Akratic Action Always Irrational?’ in Owen, Flanagan and Amelie, Rorty, eds, Identity and Moral Character (Cambridge: MIT Press), 379–400.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred 1992: Springs of Action (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millgram, Elijah 1995: ‘Was Hume a Humean?’ in Hume Studies 21, 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas 1970: The Possibility of Altruism (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek 1997: ‘Reasons and Motivation’ in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 71, 99–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher 1979: Holistic Explanation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip and Michael, Smith 1990: ‘Backgrounding Desire’, Philosophical Review, 99, 565–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip 1993: ‘Practical Unreason’ in Mind, 102, 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip 1996: ‘Freedom in Belief and Desire’ in Journal of Philosophy, 93, 429–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip forthcoming: ‘External Reasons’ in Cynthia, Macdonald and Graham, Macdonald, eds, McDowell and His Critics (Oxford: Blackwell)Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1951: ‘Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics’, Philosophical Review, 60, 177–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas 1998: What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Smith, Michael 1987: ‘The Humean Theory of Motivation’ in Mind, 96, 36–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael 1994: The Moral Problem (Oxford: Blackwell)Google Scholar
Smith, Michael 1997: ‘In Defence of The Moral Problem: A Reply to Brink, Copp and Sayre‐McCord’ in Ethics, 108, 84–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael 1999: ‘The Possibility of Philosophy of Action’ in Jan, Bransen and Stefaan, Cuypers, eds, Human Action, Deliberation and Causation (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 17–41.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael 2001: ‘The Incoherence Argument: Reply to Schafer‐Landau’ in Analysis, 61, 254–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael 2003: ‘Rational Capacities’ in Sarah, Stroud and Christine, Tappolet, eds, Weakness of Will and Varieties of Practical Irrationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Smith, Michael 2004: ‘Instrumental Desires, Instrumental Rationality’ in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael forthcoming: ‘Is there a Nexus between Reasons and Rationality?’ in Sergio, Tenenbaum, ed., Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of Science and Humanities: New Trends in Moral Psychology (Amsterdam: Rodoph).Google Scholar
Stocker, Michael 1979: ‘Desiring the Bad: An Essay in Moral Psychology’, Journal of Philosophy, 76, 738–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocker, Michael 2004: ‘Raz on the Intelligibility of Bad Acts’ in Wallace, R. Jay, Philip, PettitSamuel, Scheffler, and Michael, Smith, eds, Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Watson, Gary 1975: ‘Free Agency’ reprinted in Gary, Watson, ed., Free Will (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard 1980: ‘Internal and External Reasons’ reprinted in his Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Wilson, George M. 1989: The Intentionality of Human Action (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan 1990: Freedom Within Reason (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Michael 1972: ‘Reasons for Action and Desire’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 46, 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar