Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:55:17.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rousseau as Philosopher

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Extract

Rousseau seldom gets a mention as a philosopher in the conventional histories; if he appears at all it is in connection with that strange and rather suspect discipline ‘political philosophy’. Even then there is a tendency to look upon him as an unsystematic thinker, as a ‘philosophy’ rather than as a genuine philosopher. His ideas are held to be interesting, but the connections between them are thought to be emotional rather than logical. Again, Émile is read by students of education, but not by those studying philosophy. This is both because the ‘philosophy of education’ is thought not to be of great importance and again because of Rousseau's lack of logical rigour. Now it is true that Rousseau himself was an emotional figure, and from reading his Confessions it is easy to get the idea that there is no point in looking for interesting philosophical points in his works.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 122 note 1 Rousseau says at the beginning of Émile that childhood is an essential part of human development, because a creature that was born with full adult strength would be unable to learn how to satisfy its original needs; animals may do this by instinct, but he seems to think that the case is different for men.