Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:39:22.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Right to Strike

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Extract

Only a fool would attempt to discuss the morality of strikes in twenty-five pages or less, and even he will fail. For one thing he can be sure in advance that whatever conclusions he might come to will be ridiculed as outrageous, prejudiced or self-serving by one party or the other. There is, in particular, the accusation that the attempt to discuss in moral terms what is essentially a political issue, is itself an exercise in bourgeois politics disguised as morals, their morals but not ours. But there is also, and more worrying to my mind, the sheer complexity of the issues. This complexity is, however, simply unmanageable in the space available, and I have gone instead for the simple story, in the hope that the essentials will stand out that much more clearly. Whether I have got the right essentials, whether the elegance of the picture compensates for its lack of realism, is something that will have to emerge.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kirk, K. E., Conscience and Its Problems: An Introduction to Casuistry (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1927).Google Scholar
Leo, XIII, Rerum Novarum (1891) published as The Condition of the Working Classes by the Catholic Social Guild (Oxford, 1928).Google Scholar
Manning, H. E., ‘Leo XIII on the Condition of Labour’, Dublin Review (1891), reprinted as Leo XIII on Labour by the Catholic Truth Society (London, 1901).Google Scholar
Ullmann-Margalit, E., The Emergence of Norms (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977).Google Scholar