Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:15:47.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quality of Life and Resource Allocation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Michael Lockwood
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A new word has recently entered the British medical vocabulary. What it stands for is neither a disease nor a cure. At least, it is not a cure for a disease in the medical sense. But it could, perhaps, be thought of as an intended cure for a medicosociological disease: namely that of haphazard or otherwise ethically inappropriate allocation of scarce medical resources. What I have in mind is the term ‘QALY’, which is an acronym standing for quality adjusted life year. Just what this means and what it is intended to do I shall explain in due course. Let me first, however, set the scene.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 23: Philosophy and Medical Welfare , March 1988 , pp. 33 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shaw, Bernard, The Doctor's Dilemma: A Tragedy (first published in 1911), Ward, A. C. (ed.) (London: Longman's Green, 1960).Google Scholar

2 ‘The Junior Physician and the Court of Last Appeal’, in Balfour, James, Court Short (London: Hutchinson, 1969), 171–189.Google Scholar

3 Calebresi, Guido and Bobbit, Philip, Tragic Choices (New York: W. W. Norton, 1978), 187–188, 209 n., 232–233 n.Google Scholar

4 Gould, Donald, ‘Some Lives Cost Too Dear’, New Statesman 11 (1975)Google Scholar, quoted in Glover, Jonathan, Causing Death and Saving Lives (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1977), 220–221.Google Scholar

5 Williams, Alan, ‘The Value of QALYs’, Health and Social Service Journal 07 (1985), 3.Google Scholar

6 Kind, P., Rosser, R. and Williams, A., ‘Valuation of quality of life: Some Psychometric Evidence’, in Jones-Lee, M. W., The Value of Life and Safety (Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland, 1982).Google Scholar

7 Williams, Alan, ‘Economics of Coronary Bypass Grafting’, British Medical Journal 291 (3 08 1985), 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Ibid.

9 Ibid.

10 Richards, Tessa and Beecham, Linda, ‘The BMA in Oxford’, British Medical Journal 191 (26 04 1986), 1119–1120.Google Scholar

11 Bentham, Jeremy, The Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789), Chs. 1–5.Google Scholar

12 See Sen, Amartya, ‘Utilitarianism and Welfarism’, Journal of Philosophy 76 (09 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 The Doctor's Dilemma, op. cit., 84–85.Google Scholar

14 Williams, Alan, op. cit., 328.Google Scholar

15 Calebresi, and Bobbit, , op. cit., 233 n.Google Scholar

16 The Committee's membership ‘consisted of a lawyer, a minister, a housewife, a banker, a state government official, a labor leader, and a surgeon’ assisted by ‘a medical advisory panel made up of personnel associated with the kidney treatment program’ (Calebresi, and Bobbit, , op. cit., 209 n.).Google Scholar

17 Williams, Alan, op. cit., 327.Google Scholar

18 Wiggins, David, ‘Claims of Need’, in Honderich, Ted (ed.), Morality and Objectivity (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984), 149–202.Google Scholar

19 Harris, John, ‘Rationing Life: Quality or Justice’Google Scholar (unpublished), paper presented to the British Medical Association Annual Scientific Meeting, Oxford, 10–12 April 1986, p. 9.

20 In the Doctor's Dilemma series, Granada Television, 1984.Google Scholar

21 Harris, , op. cit., 8Google Scholar. This line of thought is developed at greater length in his The Value of Life: An Introduction to Medical Ethics (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985), Ch. 5.Google Scholar

22 Parfit, Derek, Reasons and Persons (Oxford University Press, 1984), Part III.Google Scholar

23 Hare's theory was originally put forward in Hare, R. M., ‘Ethical Theory and Utilitarianism’, in Lewis, H. D. (ed.), Contemporary Moral Philosophy 4 (London: Allen and Unwin, 1976)Google Scholar; it is developed in greater detail in his Moral Thinking (Oxford University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

24 Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, 1973), para. 8.Google Scholar

25 The preceding text appears originally in French in the Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale, No. 3/1987, 307–328Google Scholar. The postscript which follows has been added for this volume.