Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:34:09.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Practical Wisdom and the Value of Cognitive Diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2022

Anneli Jefferson  and
Katrina Sifferd
Anneli Jefferson*
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Katrina Sifferd*
Affiliation:
Elmhurst University
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The challenges facing us today require practical wisdom to allow us to react appropriately. In this paper, we argue that at a group level, we will make better decisions if we respect and take into account the moral judgment of agents with diverse styles of cognition and moral reasoning. We show this by focusing on the example of autism, highlighting different strengths and weaknesses of moral reasoning found in autistic and non-autistic persons respectively.

Type
Paper
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 92: Values and Virtues for a Challenging World , October 2022 , pp. 149 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

APA, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. (Arlington VA: American Psychiatric Association, 2013).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Irwin, Terence. (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co. 1985).Google Scholar
Birrel, Ian, ‘Greta Thunberg teaches us about autism as much as climate change’, The Guardian, 23,04.2019. Accessed 19.08.2021. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/apr/23/greta-thunberg-autism.Google Scholar
Chapman, Robert, ‘Do Neurotypicals Have Moral Agency?’ Critical Neurodiversity.com (2020). Accessed 06.12.2021. https://criticalneurodiversity.com/2020/03/31/do-neurotypicals-have-intact-moral-agency/?fbclid=IwAR1P6bXNfmhuHeC1lHjT73bmsNWb33lHE838fSqBQapY_fFWcCKuJC1-isg.Google Scholar
Chapman, Robert, ‘Neurodiversity and the Social Ecology of Mental Functions’, Perspectives on Psychological Science: 16 (2021) 1360–1372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, George, Baron-Cohen, Simon, and Skylark, William J.. ‘People With Autism Spectrum Conditions Make More Consistent Decisions’, Psychological Science 28 (2017) 1067–1076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grandin, Temple, Thinking in Pictures: And other reports from my life with autism. (New York: Doubleday, 1995).Google Scholar
Grandin, Temple. ‘The World needs all kinds of minds’, Ted Talk (2010), https://www.ted.com/talks/temple_’grandin_the_world_needs_all_kinds_of_minds?language=en. Accessed: 6.12.2021Google Scholar
Gaut, Berys, ‘Group Creativity’, Royal Institute Philosophy Supplementary Volume, 92 (2022) 5–26.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind, and Pettigrove, Glen, ‘Virtue Ethics’. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Winter 2018 edition) edited by Edward Zalta. Accessed 6.12.2021 https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/ethics-virtue/.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Anneli, Bortolotti, Lisa, and Kuzmanovic, Bojana, ‘What is unrealistic optimism?’ Consciousness and Cognition 50 (2017), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking, Fast and Slow. (London: Penguin, 2011).Google Scholar
Kennett, Jeanette,. ‘Autism, Empathy and Moral Agency’, The Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2002), 340–357.Google Scholar
Kristjansson, Kristjan, ‘The Need for Phronesis’, Royal Institute Philosophy Supplementary Volume, 92 (2022) 167–84.Google Scholar
Kuzmanovic, Bojana., Rigoux, Lionel, and Vogeley, Kai. ‘Brief Report: Reduced Optimism Bias in Self-Referential Belief Updating in High-Functioning Autism’, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 49 (2019), 2990-2998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGeer, Victoria, ‘Varieties of moral agency: lessons from autism (and psychopathy’. In: Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (ed.) Moral Psychology, The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, disease and development (Cambridge Massachusetts and London, England: MIT Press 2008), 227–257Google Scholar
Merritt, Maria, ‘Aristotelean Virtue and the Interpersonal Aspect of Ethical Character’, Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2009), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, Damian E. M., ‘On the ontological status of autism: the ‘double empathy problem’’, Disability & Society 27 (2012), 883–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richman, Kenneth A., ‘Autism and Moral Responsibility: Executive Function, Reasons Responsiveness, and Reasons Blockage’, Neuroethics 11 (2018), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozenkrantz, Liron, D'Mello, Anila M., and Gabrieli, John D. E., ‘Enhanced rationality in autism spectrum disorder’, Trends in Cognitive Science 25 (2021), 685–696.Google ScholarPubMed
Schramme, Thomas, ‘The Role of Empathy in an Agential Account of Morality: Lessons from Autism and Psychopathy’. In: Roughley, Neil and Schramme, Thomas (Eds.) Forms of Fellow Feeling: Empathy, Sympathy, Concern and Moral Agency, (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 2018), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepperd, James A., Klein, William M. P., Waters, Erika A., and Weinstein, Neil D., ‘Taking Stock of Unrealistic Optimism’, Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (2013), 395–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoemaker, David, Responsibility From the Margins, (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, Nathan, ‘Conversation, responsibility, and autism spectrum disorder’, Philosophical Psychology 29 (2016), 1015–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Nick, ‘Neurodiversity: Some Basic Terms and Definitions’, (2014). Accessed 01.10.2021. https://www.planetneurodivergent.com/neurodiversity-and-neurodivergent-basic-terminology/.Google Scholar