Article contents
Popper, Science and Rationality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 January 2010
Extract
We all think that science is special. Its products—its technological spin-off—dominate our lives which are thereby sometimes enriched and sometimes impoverished but always affected. Even the most outlandish critics of science such as Feyerabend implicitly recognize its success. Feyerabend told us that science was a congame. Scientists had so successfully hood-winked us into adopting its ideology that other equally legitimate forms of activity—alchemy, witchcraft and magic—lost out. He conjured up a vision of much enriched lives if only we could free ourselves from the domination of the ‘one true ideology’ of science just as our ancestors freed us from the domination of the Church. But he told us these things in Switzerland and in California happily commuting between them in that most ubiquitous product of science—the aeroplane.
- Type
- Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1995
References
1 ’ Since the late Seventies, these allegations were generally accepted as being well-founded. More recently this has been challenged. See Joynson, Robert B., The Burt Affair (London: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar
2 Kitcher, P., The Advancement of Science (Oxford University Press, 1993), p. 3.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by