Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:33:32.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophy in the Nuclear Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Barrie Paskins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I have chosen this title to set myself the task of commenting on the practice of philosophy in the light of my work as a philosopher in a university postgraduate department of war studies. I shall begin with some general remarks on how we are to understand ‘philosophy’, then discuss a neglected one-sidedness in the commentary which philosophers have attempted on such topics as the problems of the nuclear age.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 22: Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Problems , September 1987 , pp. 95 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rorty, (1982) 221.Google Scholar

2 Rorty, (1980) 393.Google Scholar

3 Rorty, (1982) 227.Google Scholar

4 Rorty, (1982) xl.Google Scholar

5 Rorty, (1982) xli.Google Scholar

6 Green, (1966).Google Scholar

7 Gray, (1982).Google Scholar

8 Nacht, (1985).Google Scholar

9 This includes, of course, arguments such as that of Williams, (1984)Google Scholar against making much of the ethical input into public debate.

10 Skinner, (1978), esp. Vol. 1, 128–38.Google Scholar

11 MacIntyre, (1981).Google Scholar

12 Morgenthau, (1972) 3–15Google Scholar is a classic statement of modern realism. I discuss it further in Paskins, & Dockrill, (1979) 277–85.Google Scholar