Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:59:36.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peter Browne on the Metaphysics of Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2020

Kenneth L. Pearce
Kenneth L. Pearce*
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The central unifying element in the philosophy of Peter Browne (d. 1735) is his theory of analogy. Although Browne's theory was originally developed to deal with some problems about religious language, Browne regards analogy as a general purpose cognitive mechanism whereby we substitute an idea we have to stand for an object of which we, strictly speaking, have no idea. According to Browne, all of our ideas are ideas of sense, and ideas of sense are ideas of material things. Hence we can conceive of spiritual things – including even our own spirit – only by analogy. One interesting application Browne makes of his theory is an account of how concepts such as knowledge can be correctly applied to beings that have no intrinsic properties in common, such as non-human animals, humans, angels, and God. I argue that this is best understood as what, in the contemporary literature, is known as a ‘multiple realizability’ problem and that Browne's solution to this problem has important similarities to functionalist theories in recent philosophy of mind.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 88: Irish Philosophy in the Age of Berkeley , October 2020 , pp. 215 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, Thomas, The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, 2nd ed. (London: Burns Oates & Washbourne, 1920).Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre, Historical-Critical Dictionary. Selections, trans. Popkin, Richard H. (1696; repr., Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett, 1991).Google Scholar
Berkeley, George, Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous (1713), in Philosophical Writings, ed. Clarke, Desmond M., Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008). Cited by marginal numbers.Google Scholar
Berman, David, A History of Atheism in Britain: From Hobbes to Russell (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Berman, David, Berkeley and Irish Philosophy, Continuum Studies in British Philosophy (London; New York: Continuum, 2005).Google Scholar
Bettcher, Talia Mae, Berkeley’s Philosophy of Spirit: Consciousness, Ontology, and the Elusive Subject (London: Continuum, 2007).Google Scholar
Browne, Peter, A Letter in Answer to a Book Entitled Christianity Not Mysterious (Dublin: John North, 1697).Google Scholar
Browne, Peter, The Procedure, Extent, and Limits of Human Understanding, 2nd ed. (London: William Innys, 1729).Google Scholar
Browne, Peter, Things Divine and Supernatural Conceived by Analogy with Things Natural and Human (London: William Innys; Richard Manby, 1733).Google Scholar
Collins, Anthony, A Vindication of the Divine Attributes: In Some Remarks on His Grace the Archbishop of Dublin's Sermon, Intituled, Divine Predestination and Foreknowledge Consistent with the Freedom of Man's Will (London: A. Baldwin, 1710).Google Scholar
Edwards, John, The Divine Perfections Vindicated: Or, Some Brief Remarks on His Grace William Lord Archbishop of Dublin's Sermon (London: Jonathan Robinson, John Lawrence, and John Wyat, 1710).Google Scholar
Hudson, Wayne, The English Deists, The Enlightenment World 7 (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2009).Google Scholar
King, William, Divine Predestination and Fore-Knowledg, Consistent with the Freedom of Man's Will (Dublin; London: J. Baker, 1709).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man, and the Origin of Evil, ed. Farrer, Austin, trans. Huggard, E. M. (1710; repr., La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 1985).Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., New Essays on Human Understanding, ed. and trans. Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan, Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy (1704; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Janet, ‘Functionalism,’ in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N., Fall 2018 (Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2018), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/functionalism/.Google Scholar
Lewis, David, ‘An Argument for the Identity Theory,’ Journal of Philosophy 63, (1966), 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David, ‘Mad Pain and Martian Pain,’ in Philosophical Papers, vol. 1 (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1983), 122–30.Google Scholar
Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, Peter H. (1690; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas, The Search After Truth, ed. and trans. Lennon, Thomas M. and Olscamp, Paul J., Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy (1674–1675; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Moses Maimonides, The Guide of the Perplexed. Abridged, ed. Guttman, Julius, trans. Rabin, Chaim (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1995).Google Scholar
Pearce, Kenneth L., Language and the Structure of Berkeley's World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, Kenneth L., ‘Matter, God, and Nonsense: Berkeley's Polemic Against the Freethinkers in the Three Dialogues,’ in Berkeley's Three Dialogues: New Essays, ed. Storrie, Stefan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 176–90.Google Scholar
Pearce, Kenneth L., ‘Locke, Arnauld, and Abstract Ideas,’ British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27, (2019), 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary, ‘Philosophy and Our Mental Life,’ in Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John Russell, A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sergeant, John, Transnatural Philosophy, or Metaphysics: Demonstrating the Essences and Operations of All Beings Whatever, Which Gives the Principles to All Other Sciences (London: John Sergeant, 1700).Google Scholar
Tipton, I. C., Berkeley: The Philosophy of Immaterialism (London: Methuen & Co Ltd, 1974).Google Scholar
Toland, John, Christianity Not Mysterious: Or, a Treatise Shewing, That There Is Nothing in the Gospel Contrary to Reason, nor Above It: And That No Christian Doctrine Can Be Properly Call'd a Mystery, 2nd ed. (London: Sam. Buckley, 1696).Google Scholar
Vandergriff, Kevin, ‘Naturalism, Theism, and Multiply Realizable Mental States,’ Religious Studies 54, no. 1 (2018): 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waligore, Joseph, ‘The Piety of the English Deists: Their Personal Relationship with an Active God,’ Intellectual History Review 22, (2012), 181–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy, Knowledge and Its Limits (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Winkler, Kenneth P., Berkeley: An Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Winnett, Arthur Robert, Peter Browne: Provost, Bishop, Metaphysician (London: SPCK, 1974).Google Scholar
Wollaston, William, The Religion of Nature Delineated, 5th ed. (London: James and John Knapton, 1731).Google Scholar
Yaffe, Gideon, ‘Locke on Ideas of Substance and the Veil of Perception,’ Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85, (2004), 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar