Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:22:51.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-Conceptuality, Critical Reasoning and Religious Experience: Some Tibetan Buddhist Discussions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Paul Williams
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Dalai Lama is fond of quoting a verse attributed to the Buddha to the effect that as the wise examine carefully gold by burning, cutting and polishing it, so the Buddha's followers should embrace his words after examining them critically and not just out of respect for the Master. A role for critical thought has been accepted by all Buddhists, although during two and a half millennia of sophisticated doctrinal development the exact nature, role and range of critical thought has been extensively debated. In general doctrinal difference in Buddhism has been seen as perfectly acceptable, reflecting different levels of understanding and therefore different stages on the path to enlightenment. Buddhism has tended not to look to or expect doctrinal orthodoxy, although there has always been a much stronger impetus towards orthopraxy, and common (largely monastic) code and behaviour has perhaps played a comparable role in Buddhism to common belief and creed in some other religions. Nevertheless an acceptability of doctrinal divergence has not lessened the energy and vigour devoted to lengthy and sometimes fiercely polemical debate between teachers and schools. This was nowhere more so than in Tibet, where doctrinal debates—sometimes lasting all night—to the present day form the central part of a monastic education in most of the largest Tibetan monastic universities.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 32 , March 1992 , pp. 189 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Demiéville, P. 1952. Le Concile de Lhasa. Bibliothèque de l’lnstitut des Hautes Etudes Chinoises 7. (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
Geach, P. 1971 reprint. Mental Acts (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Heath, P. L. 1967. ‘Concept’, in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edwards, P. (ed.) (New York: Macmillan and Free Press).Google Scholar
Henle, P. 1970. ‘Mysticism and semantics’, in Philosophy of Religion, Cahn, S. M. (ed.) (New York: Harper and Row).Google Scholar
Hopkins, J. 1983. Meditation on Emptiness (London: Wisdom Books).Google Scholar
Houston, G. W. 1980. Sources for a History of the bSam yas Debate. Monumenta Tibetica Historica 1:2. (Sankt Augustin: VGH Wissenschaf tsverlag).Google Scholar
Jackson, D. P. 1987. The Entrance Gate for the Wise (Vienna: Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde).Google Scholar
Karmay, S. G. 1988. The Great Perfection (Leiden: E. J. Brill).Google Scholar
mKhas grub rje dGe legs dpal, bzang. 1972. sTong thun chen mo, ed. Lha mkhar yongs dzin bstan pa, rgyalmtshan. (New Delhi, Madhyamaka Texts Series 1).Google Scholar
Klein, A. 1986. Knowledge and Liberation (New York: Snow Lion).Google Scholar
Lati, Rinbochay. 1980. Mindin Tibetan Buddhism, Napper, E.(ed.) (London: Wisdom).Google Scholar
Lindtner, Chr. 1981. ‘Atiśa’s introduction to the two truths, and its sources’, Journal of Indian Philosophy 8, 161–214.Google Scholar
Mundle, C. W. K. 1970. A Critique of Linguistic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Namgyal, T. T. 1986. Mahāmudrā: The quintessence of Mind and Meditation, trans Lhalungpa, L. P. (Boston: Shambhala).Google Scholar
O’Flaherty, W. 1975. Hindu Myths (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 1973. Conceptual Idealism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Ruegg, D. S. 1963. ‘The Jo naṅ pas: A school of Buddhist ontologists according to the Grub mtha’ šel gyi me loṅ, Journal of the American Oriental Society 83, 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, J. ‐P. 1966. Being and Nothingness, trans. Barnes, H. E. (New York: Washington Square).Google Scholar
Sastri, N. A. (ed.) 1938. Bhavasankrānti Sūtra and Nāgārjuna’s Bhavasankrānti Sāstra. (Madras: Adyar Library).Google Scholar
Thu’u bkvan bla ma, bL o bzang chos kyi nyi ma. 1989. Grub mtha’ shelgyi me long (Beijing: Kun su’i mi rigs dpe skrun khang).Google Scholar
Tsong, kha pa. 1966. dBu ma rtsa ba’i tshigle’urbyaspa Shes rab ces bya ba’I rnam bshad Rigs pa’i rgya mtsho. Modern blockprint made in India.Google Scholar
Tsong, kha pa. 1973. dBu ma dgongs pa rab gsal (Sarnath: Pleasure of Elegant Sayings Printing Press).Google Scholar
Tsong, kha pa. 1973. Drang nges legs bshad snying po (Sarnath: Pleasure of Elegant Sayings Printing Press).Google Scholar
Tsultrim Gyamtso, Rinpoche. 1986. Progressive Stages of Meditation on Emptiness. trans. Hookham, Shenpen (Oxford: Longchen Foundation).Google Scholar
Tulku Thondup, Rinpoche. 1989. Buddha Mind (New York: Snow Lion).Google Scholar
Vaidya, P. L. (ed.) 1960. Bodhicaryāvatāra (Darbhanga: Mithila Institute).Google Scholar
Von Stael‐Holstein, A. (ed.) 1926. The Kāśyapaparivarta (Shanghai: The Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Williams, P. 1980. ‘Some aspects of language and construction in the Madhyamaka’, Journal of Indian Philosophy 8, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. 1982. ‘Silence and truth—some aspects of the Madhyamaka philosophy in Tibet’, The Tibet Journal 7, 1–2, 81–90.Google Scholar
Williams, P. 1983. ‘A note on some aspects of Mi bskyod rdo rje’s critique of dGe lugs pa Madhyamaka’, Journal of Indian Philosophy 11, 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P. 1989. Mahāyāna Buddhism: The doctrinal foundations (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Williams, P. 1991. ‘Some dimensions of the recent work of Raimundo Panikkar—a Buddhist perspective’, Religious Studies 27, 511–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar