Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:02:54.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nature in the Light of Art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Extract

Art is without doubt a powerful agent in determining how nature appears to us. Andrew Forge describes seeing tree leaves in sunlight, and ‘thinking Pissarro’. ‘I am wrapped round by Impressionism and the leaves look like brush strokes’. To Harold Osborne, once one has been impressed by Van Gogh's painting of certain objects, ‘it is difficult ever again to see the objects uninfluenced by Van Gogh's vision of them’.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 242 note 1 See above, p. 228.

page 242 note 2 The Art of Appreciation (1970) p. 155.Google Scholar

page 242 note 3 Languages of Art (1968) p. 33.Google Scholar

page 242 note 4 Language of Vision (1961) p. 67.Google Scholar

page 242 note 5 Cf. Rawson, P., Drawing (1969) pp. 246 ff.Google Scholar

page 243 note 1 Cf. Rogers, L. R., Sculpture (1969) p. 231.Google Scholar

page 243 note 2 Above, p. 229.

page 244 note 1 A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1757) pt. II § iv.Google Scholar

page 244 note 2 Cf. Harrison, Andrew, in The Business of Reason, ed. Macintosh and Coval (1969) pp. 127 f.Google Scholar

page 244 note 3 Languages of Art, p. 32.Google Scholar

page 244 note 4 The Voices of Silence (Eng. tr. 1954) p. 616.Google Scholar

page 244 note 5 I do not mean to imply that Malraux denies art can set forth a view of the world. He acknowledges this, but eloquently emphasises the other side, the distinctive, autonomous values of painting.

page 245 note 1 The Life of Forms in Art (1934) 2nd Eng. ed. (1948) p. 3.Google Scholar

page 245 note 2 Transformations (1926) p. 196.Google Scholar

page 245 note 3 Discourses on Art, Discourse 11.

page 246 note 1 See Plate 5, Study of a Garden at Tintern. Compare also Cecil, Lord David, Visionary and Dreamer (1969) pp. 75 f.Google Scholar

page 246 note 2 See Plate 6.

page 247 note 1 Rawson, P., ‘The Methods of Zen Painting’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 1967, p. 335.Google Scholar

page 247 note 2 The Philosophy of Fine Art, Introduction.

page 247 note 3 Zibaldone, ed. Flora, vol. II, pp. 1230Google Scholar f. Cf. Singh, G., Leopardi and the Theory of Poetry, pp. 112 f.Google Scholar

page 248 note 1 On Chinese landscape, cf. Osborne, H., The Art of Appreciation, pp. 158Google Scholar f. For Tchelitchew, see Plate 7.

page 248 note 2 Body, Soul, Spirit (1966) p. 165.Google Scholar

page 249 note 1 Tte Meaning of Beauty (1959) (Penguin Books, 1962) p. 131.Google Scholar

page 250 note 1 See Plate 8.

page 250 note 2 Landscape: Portrait: Still-Life (1949) pp. 73 f.Google Scholar

page 251 note 1 Above, p. 240.

page 251 note 2 Above, p. 340.

page 252 note 1 Drawing, p. 298.Google Scholar

page 253 note 1 Dewey, John, Art as Experience, pp. 36Google Scholar ff. Zimmerman, R. L., ‘Can Anything be an Aesthetic Object?’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art-Criticism, 19661967, p. 184.Google Scholar

page 253 note 2 Landscape: Portrait: Still-Life, p. 87, my italics.Google Scholar

page 254 note 1 ‘The Decay of Lying’, in Intention and the Soul of Man (1891)Google Scholar. The whole context is a locus classicus on nature seen in the light of art: e.g., ‘Things are because we see them, and what we see, and how we see it, depends on the Arts that have influenced us.’

page 255 note 1 Cf. Goodman, , Languages of Art, pp. 6, 40 ff.Google Scholar

page 255 note 2 Art as Experience, p. 235.Google Scholar

page 255 note 3 Review of Metaphysics (1960) pp. 4856.Google Scholar

page 255 note 4 Being and Having (Fontana) p. 111.Google Scholar

page 256 note 1 The Life of Forms in Art, p. 33.Google Scholar

page 256 note 2 Above, p. 234.

page 257 note 1 Above, p. 238. I have profited here from a conversation with Mr M. J. Hutchings.

page 257 note 2 Above, p. 238.