Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:04:33.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How to Find the Neural Correlate of Consciousness*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Extract

There are two concepts of consciousness that are easy to confuse with one another, access-consciousness and phenomenal consciousness. However, just as the concepts of water and H2O are different concepts of the same thing, so the two concepts of consciousness may come to the same thing in the brain. The focus of this paper is on the problems that arise when these two concepts of consciousness are conflated. I will argue that John Searle's reasoning about the function of consciousness goes wrong because he conflates the two senses. And Francis Crick and Christof Koch fall afoul of the ambiguity in arguing that visual area V1 is not part of the neural correlate of consciousness. Crick and Koch's work raises issues that suggest that these two concepts of consciousness may have different (though overlapping) neural correlates – despite Crick and Koch's implicit rejection of this idea.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Searle, John, ‘Who is Computing with the Brain?Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13/4 (1990), 632–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Searle, John, The Rediscovery of the Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992)Google Scholar.

3 Crick, F. and Koch, C., ‘Are We Aware of Neural Activity in Primary Visual Cortex?Nature 375 (11 05 1995), 121–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

4 Pollen, D.Cortical Areas in Visual Awareness’, Nature 377 (28 09 1995), 293–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

5 Crick, F., The Astonishing Hypothesis (New York: Scribners, 1994)Google Scholar.

6 Block, N., ‘On a Confusion about a Function of Consciousness’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18/2 (1995), 227–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Hartmann, J. A et al. , ‘Denial of Visual Perception’, Brain and Cognition 16 (1991), 2940CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

8 Milner, A. D. and Goodale, M. A., The Visual Brain in Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

9 Crick, F. and Koch, C., untitled response to Pollen, Nature 377 (28 09 1995), 294–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Crick, F. and Koch, C., ‘Why Neuroscience May Be Able to Explain Consciousness’, sidebar in Scientific American, 12 1995, 92Google Scholar.

11 Crick and Koch, ‘Are We Aware?’

12 Ibid.

13 Wiser, M. and Carey, S., ‘When Heat and Temperature Were One’, in Mental Models, ed. Gentner, D. and Stevens, A. (Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1983)Google Scholar.

14 See N. Block, ‘On a Confusion’

15 Raffman, D., ‘On the Persistence of Phenomenology’, in Conscious Experience, ed. Metzinger, T. (Place: Schningh, 1995)Google Scholar.

16 Block, N., Review of Francis Crick, The Astonishing Hypothesis, Contemporary Psychology, 05 1996, pp. 427–9Google Scholar.

17 Crick, F., ‘Visual Perception: Rivalry and Consciousness’, Nature 379 (2 07 1996), 485–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.