No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 January 2010
In a footnote to the preface to the second edition of his Critique of Pure Reason (1787) Kant remarked that ‘it still remains a scandal to philosophy and to human reason in general that the existence [Dasein] of things outside us … must be accepted on faith, and that if anyone thinks good to doubt their existence, we are unable to counter his doubts by any satisfactory proof’ (B XL). In Being and Time (1927) Heidegger remarks, somewhat less famously, that the scandal of philosophy, far from being the continuing absence of philosophically satisfactory proof of the existence of the world outside human subjectivity, is rather-the-very idea that such proof need be sought at all: ‘If Dasein is understood correctly, it defies such proofs, because, in its being, it already is what subsequent proofs deem necessary to demonstrate for it’ (BT, 205).
1 Heidegger, Martin, Sein und Zeit (1927)Google Scholar, trans. Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward as Being and Time (London: SCM Press, 1962)Google Scholar, cited as BT, with the original pagination in the margins.
2 Heidegger, , The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, trans. Heim, Michael (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984)Google Scholar, cited as MFL, the text of a lecture course at Marburg in 1928.
3 Heidegger, , The Essence of Reasons, trans. Malick, Terrence (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969)Google Scholar, cited as ER, from Vom Wesen des Grundes, first published in a Festschrift for Edmund Husserl (1929).
4 See The Gospel according to John, trans, with an introduction and notes by Brown, Raymond E. (New York: Doubleday, 1966), Volume 1, 508´9.Google Scholar
5 See Guignon, Charles B., Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983).Google Scholar
6 Originally published in Mind 38 (1929)Google Scholar, reprinted in Ryle, Gilbert, Collected Papers (London: Hutchinson, 1971), Volume 1, 197–214.Google Scholar
7 Ibid. 210.
8 See Richardson, John, Existential Epistemology: a Heideggerian Critique of the Cartesian Project (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
9 I am grateful to David Cockburn for his comments on an earlier version of this paper.