Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:44:19.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Context of American Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Marcus G. Singer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I am, naturally, greatly honoured to have been invited by the Royal Institute of Philosophy to organize and conduct their lecture series on American Philosophy. It has been an interesting if trying experience, and I must say that the process of organizing it has given me a special respect for the patience and administrative capacities of those who have the task year in year out. Of course there were special difficulties in the way of importing so many people from the United States (especially since the Institute does not have the funds needed to bring them over), but if the series was to be on American Philosophy—whatever that is—it seemed especially appropriate that the lectures be given predominantly by Americans who have made a special study of the subject— again, whatever that is. We may, of course, end with the conclusion that there is no such distinctive subject, and that the name ‘American Philosophy’ is as nominal as a name can be, but that, we should note, is something to be found out, not a conclusion dictated in advance.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 19: American Philosophy , March 1985 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Schneider, Herbert W., A History of American Philosophy, 2nd edn, 1963 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1946), vii–viii, x, xv.Google Scholar

2 This has been observed by Commager, Henry Steele, ‘The Revolution as a World Ideal’, Saturday Review, 13 12 1975, 14.Google Scholar

3 Royce, Josiah, ‘William James and the Philosophy of Life’, William James and other Essays (New York: Macmillan, 1911), 3ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Murdoch, Iris, The Sovereignty of Good, (New York: Schocken Books, 1971), Ch. 2, 46.Google Scholar

5 Science and the Modern World, 1932 edn (Cambridge: University Press, 1926), Ch. 3, 61. Cf. Ch. 5, 108.Google Scholar

6 Cohen, Morris, American Thought (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1954), 9.Google Scholar Cf. Cohen, , A Dreamer's Journey (Glencoe: The Free Press; Boston: The Beacon Press, 1949), 195 et seq.Google Scholar

7 Fodor's Jet Age Guide to Europe 1962 (New York: David McKay Company, 1962), 349, 707, 115, 429, 204.Google Scholar

8 The Times Tuesday 9 10 1984, 14, 17.Google Scholar On Tuesday 16 October 1984, 35, the reader is told that ‘Rowan and Martin present a peculiarly American humour show …’

9 Mill, J. S., A System of Logic, 1st edn, 1843; 8th ed, 1872 (London: Longmans, Green, 1949), Bk. VI, Ch. ix, Sec. 4, 590–591.Google Scholar

10 Whitehead, A. N., Adventures of Ideas (Cambridge: University Press, 1933), Ch. 6, 125 (Penguin edn, 1942, 121).Google Scholar