We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2010
The man generally known as Averroes—Muhammad Ibn Ahmad (c. 1126–98)—was a Muslim scholar from southern Spain who came to be regarded as one of the great authorities on Aristotle's philosophy. Medieval and even later philosophers in the Scholastic tradition referred to him simply as ‘the Commentator’ just as they referred to Aristotle himself as ‘the Philosopher’. Averroes' authority as an expositor was never wholly unchallenged and, in a purely historical context, the term ‘Averroist’ should strictly be reserved for those Aristotelians who followed the interpretations of Averroes rather than those of, say, Avicenna. Some of these interpretations, however, suggested beliefs that were inconsistent with acceptance of a Creator of the material world or with belief in a last judgment at which individual souls would be punished or rewarded for their life on earth. They suggested, rather, that the material world was eternal and that individual souls did not survive bodily death. This raised a general problem about what to say in the face of a conflict between faith and reason, between the teachings of the Church and the teachings of philosophy. Averroism became associated with a particular problem and with what was known as the ‘twofold truth’, according to which it is possible to admit the conflict and continue to profess a religious faith without abandoning or abridging one's commitment to philosophy.
1 Quoted from Owen, J., Evenings with the Skeptics, or free discussion on freethinkers (London: Longmans, 1881), 22.Google Scholar
2 Ibid., 23. A complete list of the condemned propositions is included as an appendix to Madonnet, P., Siger de Brabant et L'Averroïsme Latin au XIIIme Siècle (Louvain: Institut Supérieur de Philosophic de l'Université, 1911), 175–191.Google Scholar
3 Hourani, G. F. (ed. and trans.), Averroes on the Harmony of Religion and Philosophy (London: Luzac, 1976), 50.Google Scholar
4 Quoted from Golby, T. (ed. and trans.), St Thomas Aquinas: Philosophical Texts (Oxford University Press, 1951), 30–31.Google Scholar
5 Quoted from Wippel, J. F. and Wolter, A. B. (eds), Medieval Philosophy from Augustine to Nicholas of Cusa (New York: The Free Press, 1969), 365.Google Scholar
6 See Popkin, R. H., The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979), Ch. III.Google Scholar
7 Cassirer, E., Kristeller, P. O. and Randall, J. H. Jr. (ed.), The Renaissance Philosophy of Man (Chicago University Press, 1948), 377.Google Scholar
8 Critique of Practical Reason, II, ii, 4.
9 Op. cit., 361–362.
10 Op. cit., 375.
11 For instance, J. H. Randall, Jr, in his introduction to the English translation. Op. cit., 274.
12 New English Bible (Oxford University Press, 1961), I Corinthians 15:13–14.Google Scholar
13 Op. cit., 377.
14 Op. cit., 378.
15 Op. cit., 374.
16 ‘Preliminary Dissertation’, Section 11, in Gerhardt, C. I. (ed.), G. W. Leibniz: Die Philosophischen Schriften, Vol. VI (Berlin, 1885 reprinted Hildesheim: Olms, 1978), 56.Google Scholar
17 See note 3 above.
18 See note 2 above.
19 Principles of Philosophy, Part I, 39–40. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R. and Murdoch, D. (trans.), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (Cambridge University Press, 1985), I, 206.Google Scholar
20 Careil, A. Foucher de (ed.), Nouvelles lettres et opuscules inédits de Leibniz (Paris: Auguste Durand, 1857), 180.Google Scholar
21 According to the Third Antinomy a strong argument can be mounted for both ‘There is no freedom; everything takes place solely in accordance with laws of nature’ and ‘Causality in accordance with laws of nature is not the only causality from which the appearances of the world can one and all be derived’ (Critique of Pure Reason, A 444/B 472).
22 Remnant, P. and Bennett, J. (eds), G. W. Leibniz: New Essays Concerning Human Understanding (Cambridge University Press, 1981), 494.Google Scholar
23 Sellier, P. (ed.), Pascal: Pensées—Nouvelle Edition établié pour la première fois d'après la copie de reférénce de Gilberte Pascal (Paris: Mercure de France, 1976), 357.Google Scholar
24 Barrett, C. (ed.), Wittgenstein: Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1966), 53ff.Google Scholar
