Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:45:12.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The first person: problems of sense and reference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2010

Extract

0 Consider ‘I’ as used by a given speaker and some ordinary proper name of that speaker: are these two coreferential singular terms which differ in Fregean sense? If they could be shown to be so, we might be able to explain the logical and epistemological peculiarities of ‘I’ by appeal to its special sense and yet feel no temptation to think of its reference as anything more exotic than a human being.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altham, J. E. J., ‘Indirect Reflexives and Indirect Speech’, in Diamond, Cora and Teichman, Jenny (eds), Intention and Intentionality: Essays in Honour of G. E. M. Anscombe (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1979), pp. 2538.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M., ‘The First Person’, in Anscombe, Collected Philosophical Papers, vol. II: Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind (Oxford: Blackwell, 1981), pp. 2136.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M., ‘The Subjectivity of Sensation’, in Anscombe, Collected Philosophical Papers, vol. II: Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind (Oxford: Blackwell, 1981), pp. 4456.Google Scholar
Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S., Meaning and Understanding: Essays on the Philosophical Investigations, vol. I (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980).Google Scholar
Castañeda, H.-N., ‘“He”: A Study in the Logic of Self-Consciousness’, Ratio, 8 (1966), pp. 130–57.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael, Frege: Philosophy of Language (2nd edition, London: Duckworth, 1981).Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth, The Varieties of Reference (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Geach, P. T., ‘On Beliefs about Oneself’, in Geach, Logic Matters (Oxford: Blackwell, 1972), pp. 128–9.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T., review of Evans, The Varieties of Reference, Philosophy, 61 1986), pp. 534–40.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind, An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, vol. III (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
Hamilton, Andrew, ‘Anscombian and Cartesian Scepticism’, Philosophical Quarterly, 41, (162) (1991), pp. 3954.Google Scholar
James, William, The Principles of Psychology (2 vols, London: Macmillan, 1891).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E., ‘Wittgenstein's Lectures in 1930–33’, Mind, 64 (1955), pp.127.Google Scholar
Perry, John, ‘Frege on Demonstratives’, in Perry, The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 325.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David, Sameness and Substance (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980).Google Scholar
Williams, C. J. E, ‘Myself’, Ratio (New Series) 4 (1991).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, On Certainty, eds. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Wright, G. H. von, trans Paul, D. and Anscombe, G. E. M. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Grammar, ed. Rhees, Rush, trans Kenny, Anthony (Oxford: Blackwell, 1974).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations, trans Anscombe, G. E. M. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1978).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, The Blue and Brown Books (Oxford: Blackwell, 1978).Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin, Frege's Conception of Numbers as Objects (Aberdeen University Press, 1983).Google Scholar