No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2009
My very worthy, much reverenced, and asmuch beloved good sir. I receaved of late yowrs of the 26 of feb. & [Of the [] of Ia’ deleted] an other of a [word deleted] later date but I know not the day & I have sent it to our superiour to read, in regard of the speciall points thearof. I acquainted that worthy noble man with your desire to have leave in his name to signifie to his hol. the nature of his greaf & the triall that his litle regard of our suites doth put him & others unto. who answered me that he was very willing that yow shold not only signifie soe much in his name but also if yow pleased write that or what els yow shold think good as from him & for that end he gave yow his seall, which mee thinks yow might make much good use of. thear is a bruite & it comes from the Ies. freinds that yow are come from Rome But I take it as [or ‘is’] a dorr. Some say that Salkill the Ies. that is fallen & lives with the Bishop of lond. did make that booke which I sent yow, against his hol. but I can not beleiv that he is able to doe it. it must be done by some that is better acquainted in Rome thowgh some say it must be some Ies. or religiouse that have generall informations of all countryes as that hath of Spayne & Italie. d. Hill is prisoner in the clink and a Ies. one Rand alias Russell alias lentall at the same tyme committed to Newgate, cross the pursuivant told my Lo.
1066 George Birkhead.
1067 Identity uncertain.
1068 John King.
1069 This is a reference to Supplicatio ad Imperatorem, Reges, Principes, super causis generalis Concilii convocandi. contra Paulum Quintum (1613)Google Scholar which was known by its soubriquet Novus Homo. See Malcolm, N., De Dominis (1560–1624) (1984), 41Google Scholar; Patterson, W.B., King James VI and I and the Reunion of Christendom (Cambridge, 1997), 119–20Google Scholar. Jackson sent Pett this ‘little libell of some five sheets of paper newly published in England agaynst his holynes’, but Pett dared not send it on to More because of its dangerous subject matter about ‘great persones’ in Rome, AAW A XII, no. 87 (p. 189).
1070 On 12 April 1613 Jackson had written to More that the author might well be Jacopo Marta, but John Salkeld ‘or some that have been familiar with him’ were suspected for it, AAW A XII, no. 75 (p. 159). Birkhead believed Salkeld was the author, AAW A XII, no. 68.
1071 Thomas Hill OSB.
1072 Thomas Rand SJ. See CRS 75, 274–5. Edward Bennett reported his arrest on 26 April 1613, AAW A XII, no. 85. See Foley IV, 589–92 for Rand's examination (dated by Foley to 1607) concerning his opinion of the oath of allegiance. Rand was evidently soon released for in October 1613 he replaced the objectionable Michael Walpole SJ as confessor in the seminary at Douai. He was removed after six months, allegedly because he was too sympathetic to the anti-SJ line taken by some of the seminarists there, TD V, 69, 71.
1073 George Abbot.
1074 Marie de Médicis.
1075 Louis XIII.
1076 Sir Thomas Edmondes.
1077 Nicolas de Neufville, Seigneur de Villeroi.
1078 Margate. See CSPV 1610–13, 504, 513, 521, 523–4, 525, 531, 537.Google Scholar
1079 Princess Christine.
1080 CSPV 1610–13, 459–60.Google Scholar
1081 John Baptist Vives.
1082 For the pardon granted to Vaux and the restitution of his estates, with a condition that the oath would not be tendered to him again and a reservation of any decision about his imprisonment to the king, see PRO, SO 3/5 (October 1612); cf. CSPD 1611–18, 181.Google Scholar