Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:15:04.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Telerobotic surgery project for laparoscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Alberto Rovetta ,
Remo Sala ,
Xia Wen ,
Francesca Cosmi ,
Arianna Togno  and
Santo Milanesi
Alberto Rovetta
Affiliation:
Telerobotics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan (Italy)
Remo Sala
Affiliation:
Telerobotics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan (Italy)
Xia Wen
Affiliation:
Telerobotics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan (Italy)
Francesca Cosmi
Affiliation:
Telerobotics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan (Italy)
Arianna Togno
Affiliation:
Telerobotics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan (Italy)
Santo Milanesi
Affiliation:
Telerobotics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan (Italy)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper deals with the first transatlantic experiment of robotic telesurgery. A robot in Milan (Italy) performed an operation on a model of a pig, and the surgeon controller was in JPL, Pasadena (USA). By means of two communication satellites and of an optical fibre network, the robot performed a biopsy and a preliminary cut for a laparoscopic mini-invasive surgery operation.

Keywords

TelesurgeryLaparoscopyRobotPig
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , July 1995 , pp. 397 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Anderson, R. J., “Teleoperation with virtual torce feedback” Proc. Telemanipulation Technology and Space Telerobotics Boston (7 09., 1993) vol. 2057 pp. 32–39.Google Scholar
2.Bejczy, A., Szakaly, Z. and Kim, W.S., “A Laboratory Breadboard System for Dual-Arm Teleoperation” Proc. 3rd Ann. Workshop Space Operations Autom. Robotics (07, 1989) pp. 649–660.Google Scholar
3.Funda, J., Taylor, R. and LaRose, D., “Optimal Motion Control for Teleoperated Surgical Robots” Proc. Telemanipulation Technology and Space Telerobotics Boston (7 09., 1993) vol. 2057, pp. 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hannaford, B. and Anderson, R., “Experimental and Simulation Studies of Hard Contact in Force Reflecting Teleoperations” Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics and Automation(April 1988) pp. 584–589.Google Scholar
5.Bejczy, A. K. and Kim, W. S., “Graphic Display for Operator Aid in Telemanipulation” Proc. IEEE Conf. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Charlottesville(Oct. 1991) pp. 1059–1067.Google Scholar
6.Szakaly, Z., Kim, W.S. and Bejczy, A.K., “Force-Reflecting Teleoperated System with Shared and Compliant Control Capabilities” Proc. Nasa Conf. on Space Telerobotics (1989) vol. 4, pp. 145–155.Google Scholar
7.Kim, W., Hannaford, B. and Bejczy, A., “Force-Reflection and Shared Compliant Control in Operating Telemanipu-lators with Time Delay” IEEE Trans, on Robotics and Automation 8, No. 2176–185 (04, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Komoriya, K. and Tani, K., “Utilization of the Virtual Environment System for Autonomous Control of the Mobile Robots” IEEE Int. Workshop on Intelligent Motion Control, Istanbul (08, 1990) vol. 1, pp. 439–444.Google Scholar
9.Kotoku, T., Tanie, K. and Fujikawa, A., “Environment Modeling for the Interactive Display (EMID) Used in Telerobotic Systems” Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS ’91, Osaka (11, 1991) vol. 2, pp. 999–1004.Google Scholar
10.Lee, S., “Intelligent Sensing and Control for Advanced Teleoperation” IEEE Control Systems, 13, No.3, 19–28 (06,1993).Google Scholar
11.Lee, S., Bekey, G. and Bejczy, A.,“Computer control of Space-born Teleoperators with Sensory Feedback” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation(1985) pp. 205–214.Google Scholar
12.Massimino, M. J., “Manipulator Position Display (MPD) for Human-Machine Interaction” Proc. Telemanipulation Technology and Space Telerobotics,Boston(7 Sept., 1993) pp. 108–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Rovetta, A., Technical Report on Telerobotic Surgery Experiments by Telephone and Satellites (Politecnico di Milano, 07 1993).Google Scholar
14.Hogan, N., “Impedance Control: an Approach to Manipulation” J. Dynam. Syst., Measurement Control 107, No.1, 1–7 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar