Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:17:53.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Summary of recent standardization activities in the field of robotics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2012

Seungbin Moon ,
Sungsoo Rhim ,
Young-Jo Cho ,
Kwang-Ho Park  and
Gurvinder S. Virk
Seungbin Moon
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Engineering, Sejong University, Korea
Sungsoo Rhim*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Korea
Young-Jo Cho
Affiliation:
Robot/Cognitive System Research Department, Electronics and Telecommunication Research Institute, Korea
Kwang-Ho Park
Affiliation:
Machinery and Construction Standards Division, Korea Agency for Technology and Standards, Gwacheon, Korea
Gurvinder S. Virk
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, University of Gävle, Sweden CLAWAR Association Ltd, UK
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper summarizes the recent standardization activities in the field of robotics by ISO (International Organization for Standardization), IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission), OMG (Object Management Group), and other organizations. While the standards in industrial robots have been mainly developed by ISO, the standards on the emerging service robots are initiated by many organizations. One of the goals of this paper is to coordinate the efforts among these groups so that more effective standardization activity can be executed. Standardization in the emerging service robots will eventually promote the proliferation of service robot markets in the near future.

Keywords

StandardService robotsSafetyPerformancePersonal care
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , March 2013 , pp. 217 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Morita, T., Aramaki, S., Kurono, S. and Kagekawa, K., “A Knowledge Representation for the Communication Between Robots,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, Tokyo, Japan (Nov. 3–5, 1993) pp. 308–313.Google Scholar
2.Freund, E. and Robmann, J., “Systems Approach to Robotics and Automation,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, Japan (May 21–27, 1995) pp. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Duhaut, D., “Requirement to Standardise Self Reconfigurable Robotics,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan (Jul. 16–20, 2003) pp. 1011–1016.Google Scholar
4.Pirjanian, P., “Challenges for Standards for Consumer Robotics,” Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts, Nagoya, Japan (Jun. 12–15, 2005) pp. 260–264.Google Scholar
5.Lafvas, M., “Robots - in industry and beyond,” ISO Focus 4 (12), 34–36 (2007).Google Scholar
6.Moon, S. and Virk, G. S., “Survey on ISO Standards for Industrial and Service Robots,” Proceedings of the ICROS-SICE International Joint Conference, Fukuoka, Japan (Aug. 18–21, 2009) pp. 1878–1881.Google Scholar
7.Moon, S., Rhim, S., Cho, Y.-J. and Virk, G. S., “International Standardization Activities in Robotic Fields,” Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Climbing and Walking Robots and Support Technologies for Mobile Machines, Istanbul, Turkey (Sep. 9–11, 2009) pp. 140–146.Google Scholar
8.Virk, G. S., “New Standards for New Robots,” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robotics (CLAWAR 2007), Singapore (Jul. 16–18, 2007) pp. 698–707.Google Scholar
9.Virk, G. S., Moon, S. and Gelin, R., “ISO Standards for Service Robots,” Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Climbing and Walking Robots and the Support Technologies for Mobile Machines, Coimbra, Portugal (Sep. 8–10, 2008) pp. 133–138.Google Scholar
10.Virk, G. S., “Safety Standard for Personal Care Robot,” Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots and Support Technologies for Mobile Machines, Istanbul, Turkey (Sep. 9–11, 2009) pp. 147–154.Google Scholar
11.Harper, C., Dogramadzi, S. and Tokhi, M. O., “Development in Vocabulary Standardization for Robots and Robotic Devices,” Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots and Support Technologies for Mobile Machines, Istanbul, Turkey (Sep. 9–11, 2009) pp. 155–162.Google Scholar
12.Yamada, Y. and Ota, Y., “Novel Activity on International Safety Standardization for Personal Care Robots,” Proceedings of the ICROS-SICE International Joint Conference, Fukuoka, Japan (Aug. 18–21, 2009) pp. 1882–1883.Google Scholar
13.Rhim, S., Ryu, J., Park, K. and Lee, S., “Performance Evaluation Criteria for Autonomous Cleaning Robots,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, Jacksonville, FL, USA (Jun. 20–23, 2007) pp. 167–172.Google Scholar
14.Kotoku, T. and Mizukawa, M., “Robot Middleware and Its Standardization in OMG,” Proceedings of the SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference, Busan, Korea (Oct. 18–21, 2006) pp. 2028–2031.Google Scholar
15.Jacoff, A., Messina, E. and Evans, J., “A Standard Test Course for Urban Search and Rescue Robots,” Proceedings of the Performance Metrics for Intelligent Sys. Workshop, Gaithersburg, MD, USA (Aug. 14–16, 2000) pp. 499–503.Google Scholar
16.Messina, E. R. and Jacoff, A. S., “Measuring the Performance of Urban Search and Rescue Robots,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, Woburn, MA, USA (May 16–17, 2007) pp. 28–33.Google Scholar
17.Kazanzides, P., “Safety Design for Medical Robots,” Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Sep. 3–6, 2009) pp. 7208–7211.Google Scholar
18.Cousins, S., Gerkey, B., Conley, K. and Garage, W., “Sharing Software with ROS,” IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag. 17 (2), 12–14 (Jun. 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Bruyninckx, H., “Open Robot Control Software: The OROCOS Project,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Seoul, Korea (May 21–26, 2001) pp. 2523–2428.Google Scholar
20.Ando, N., Suehiro, T., Kitagaki, K., Kotoku, T. and Yoon, W., “RT-Middleware: Distributed Component Middleware for Robot Technology,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and System, Alberta, Canada (Aug. 2–6, 2005) pp. 3933–3938.Google Scholar
21.Kim, M., Han, S. and Park, H. S., “An Automatic Robot Software Design Tool: An Open Platform for Robotics Services,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, Bilbao, Spain (Sep. 13–16, 2010) pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
22.Madhavan, R., “RAS Standing Committee for Standards Activities - An Update on Recent Activities,” IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag. 18 (1), 11–18 (Mar. 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar