Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:26:31.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Robot programming languages: the statement of a problem*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

L. Van Aken  and
H. Van Brussel
L. Van Aken
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Celestijnenlaan 300 B. B-3030-Leuven (Belgium)
H. Van Brussel
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Celestijnenlaan 300 B. B-3030-Leuven (Belgium)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The programming of robots forms a popular research topic. Different approaches for developing ideal robot programming system have already been proposed. They all attempt to raise the level of abstraction of the robot programming system. They differ, however, to a great extent in the stage of maturity they have reached to become eligible for industrial application. “Explicit robot programming languages”, in which every robot action has to be specified explicitly, can be said to be ready for industrial application. Therefore a detailed analysis is made of the requirements that are put on the class of “explicit robot programming languages”. Their basic composing elements are recognized and discussed in detail.

Keywords

RobotLanguageProgramming
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 141 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Simons, J., “Mathematica, Programmatie en Controle van Industriële Robots” In: (Simons, J. et al. ) Course Notes of a Summer Session on Robotics, K.U. Leuven (04–05 17 1983).Google Scholar
2.Lozano-Pérez, T., “Robot Programming”. Proceedings of the IEEE 71, No. 7 (07 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ambler, A.P., Popplestone, R.J. and Kempf, K.G., “An experiment in the off-line programming of robots” Proceedings 12th ISIR, Paris-France (06, 1982).Google Scholar
4.Paul, R.P., Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming and Control (Cambridge MA, MIT Press, 1981).Google Scholar
5.Grossman, D.D., “Programming a computer controlled manipulator by guiding through the motions” IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Res. Rep. RC 6393 (1977).Google Scholar
6.Latombe, J.C. and Mazer, E., “LM, a high-level language for controlling assembly robots”, 11th ISIR, Tokyo-Japan (10, 1981).Google Scholar
7.Van Aken, L. and Van Brussel, H., “Including a structured geometric database into an off-line robot programming system” Proc. 5th PROLAMAT, Paris (06, 1985).Google Scholar
8.Brady, M., Robot Motion: Planning and Control (Brady, M. et al. , Cambridge MA, MIT Press, 1983).Google Scholar
9.Van Aken, L. and Van Brussel, H., “On-line robot trajectory control in joint coordinates by means of imposed acceleration profiles” Proc. 15th ISIR, Tokyo, (09, 1985).Google Scholar
10.Raibert, M.H. and Craig, J.J., “Hybrid position/force control of manipulators” ASME Journal Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control (06, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.De Schutter, J., “Compliant robot motion: task formulation and control” Ph.D. Thesis (K.U. Leuven, 86D1, 1986).Google Scholar