Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:45:32.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Procedures to determine the principal directions of kinematic performance in serial robots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2018

Ociel Flores-Díaz ,
Ignacio Juárez-Campos  and
Jorge Carrera-Bolaños
Ociel Flores-Díaz*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Michoacan University of Saint Nicholas of Hidalgo, Morelia, Mexico
Ignacio Juárez-Campos
Affiliation:
FIM, UMSNH, Morelia, Mexico. E-mail: [email protected]
Jorge Carrera-Bolaños
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City. E-mail: [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Assume that the end-effector of a serial mechanism with n-degrees of freedom arrives at the position p0, where it can change arbitrarily the direction of its movement. The physical conditions imply that this change in direction also alters its velocity. The kinematic performance ellipse represents the velocities according to the new direction of the system, and thus solving the problem of which direction will correspond to a maximum or minimum (principal directions) magnitude of the corresponding velocity. In this paper, a new procedure to calculate these principal directions is presented and contrasted with two of the most common procedures employed in the field. All three procedures are considered in some detail, in order to understand their underlying concepts and, therefore, gain a deeper understanding of the physical situation. They are all proved in standard examples.

Keywords

Principal velocity directionsSerial mechanic systemsManipulability ellipsesMaps of principal directionsSystematic procedures
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 36 , Issue 11 , November 2018 , pp. 1664 - 1679
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Angeles, J., Fundamentals of Robotic Mechanical Systems: Theory, Methods, and Algorithms (Springer, Cham, 2014) pp. 221–254.Google Scholar
2. Sciavicco, L. and Siciliano, B., Modelling and Control of Robot Manipulators (Springer-Verlag, London, 1999) pp. 116–129.Google Scholar
3. Lung-Wen, T., Robot Analysis: The Mechanics of Serial and Parallel Manipulators (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1999) pp. 211–221.Google Scholar
4. Asada, T. and Slotine, E., Robot Analysis and Control (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1986) pp. 51–71.Google Scholar
5. Spong, M. W. and Vidyasagar, M., Robot Dynamics and Control (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1989) pp. 111–128.Google Scholar
6. Yoshikawa, T., “Manipulabity of robotic mechanisms,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 4 (2), 3–9 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Yoshikawa, T., “Manipulability and Redundancy Control of Robotic Mechanisms,” Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, St. Louis, MO, USA (March 25–28, 1985) pp. 1004–1009.Google Scholar
8. Angeles, J. and Lopez-Cajun, C. S., “Kinematic isotropy and conditioning index of serial robotic manipulator,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 11 (6), 560–571 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Gosselin, C. and Angeles, J., “A global performance index for the kinematic optimization of robotic manipulators,” Trans. ASME 113, 414–421 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Antonelli, G., Fossen, T. I. and Yoerger, D. R., Springer HandBook of Robotics (Springer, Berlin, 2008) pp. 229–244.Google Scholar
11. Ming-Yih, L., Erdman, A. G. and Gutman, Y., “Development of kinematic/kinetic performance tools in synthesis of multi-DoF mechanisms,” Trans. ASME 115, 462–471 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Ming-Yih, L., Erdman, A. G. and Gutman, Y., “Applications of kinematic/kinetic performance tools in synthesis of multi-DOF mechanisms,” Trans. ASME 116, 452–461 (1994).Google Scholar
13. Tsai, M. J. and Chiou, Y. H., “Manipulability of manipulators,” Mech. Mach. Theory 25 (5), 575–585 (1990).Google Scholar
14. Park, F. C. and Kim, J. W., “Manipulability of closed kinematics chains,” Trans. ASME 120, 542–548 (1998).Google Scholar
15. Legnani, G., Tosi, D., Fassi, I., Giberti, H. and Cinquemani, S., “The point of isotropy and other properties of serial and parallel manipulators,” Mech. Mach. Theory 45, 1407–1423 (2010).Google Scholar
16. Kucuk, S. and Bingul, Z., “Robot Workspace Optimization Based on a Novel Local and Global Performance Indices,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (2005) pp. 1593–1598.Google Scholar
17. Mohanta, J. K., Singh, Y. and Mohan, S., “Kinematic and dynamic performance investigations of asymmetric (U-shape fixed base) planar parallel manipulators,” Robotica 36 (8), 1–33 (2018).Google Scholar
18. Kuei-Jen, C. and Pi-Ying, C., “Investigation on velocity performance deviation of serial manipulators resulted from fabrication errors,” Int. J. Robot. Autom. 32 (4), 324–331 (2017).Google Scholar
19. Merlet, J. P., “Jacobian, manipulability, condition number, and accuracy of parallel robots,” J. Mech. Des. 128, 199–206 (2006).Google Scholar
20. Flores-Díaz, O., Influencia de la Manipulabilidad Cinemática y Dinámica en la Demanda de Energía en Robots Seriales Ph.D. Thesis (Mexico: Department of Mechanical Engineering, UNAM, 2013).Google Scholar
21. Flores-Díaz, O., Carrera-Bolaños, J. and Cuenca-Jiménez, F., “Functions in polar coordinates to determine the kinematic manipulability in serial robots,” Int. J. Eng. Innov. Res. 2 (3), 293–300 (2013).Google Scholar
22. Salisbury, J. K. and Craig, J. J., “Articulated hands: Force control and kinematic issues,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 1 (1), 4–17 (1982).Google Scholar
23. Chiacchio, P., Chiaverini, S., Sciavicco, L. and Siciliano, B., “Global task space manipulability ellipsoids for multiple-arm systems,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 7 (5), 678–685 (1991).Google Scholar
24. Grossman, S. I., Elementary Linear Algebra (Saunders College, Orlando, 1994) pp. 576–594.Google Scholar
25. Lay, D. C., Linear Algebra and its Applications (Adison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2000) pp. 441–486.Google Scholar
26. Golub, G. H. and Van Loan, C. F., Matrix Computations (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1996) pp. 54–59.Google Scholar
27. Strang, G., Linear Algebra and its Applications (Thomson-Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA, 2006).Google Scholar
28. Curtis, C. W., Linear Algebra: An Introductory Approach (Springer, New York, 1999) pp. 271–278.Google Scholar
29. Akivis, M. A. and Goldberg, V. V., An Introduction to Linear Algebra (Dover publications, New York, 1977) pp. 133–143.Google Scholar
30. Gurtin, M. E., An Introduction to Continuum Mechanics (Academic Press, New York, 1981) pp. 41–85.Google Scholar