Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:02:39.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinematic Synthesis and Design of the Robust Closed Loop Articulated Minimally actuated (CLAM) Hand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2019

Nina Robson ,
Shramana Ghosh  and
Gim Song Soh Open the ORCID record for Gim Song Soh [Opens in a new window]
Nina Robson
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, California State University Fullerton, Fullerton, CA, USA Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Shramana Ghosh
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Gim Song Soh*
Affiliation:
Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The paper presents a comprehensive design process for the development of the minimally actuated Closed Loop Articulated Mechanical (CLAM) hand. Each of the fingers is designed as a planar one degree of freedom eight-bar linkage with an anthropomorphic backbone chain. The fingers movement is based on experimentally obtained physiological precision grasping task, with incorporated second-order task specifications, related to maintaining fingertip–body contact with a minimum number of fingers. Instead of actuating individual joints in each finger, the mechanism generates the desired anthropomorphic grasping trajectory using a single actuator in each finger. The paper offers not only details on multi-loop articulated hands design based on anthropometric data and physiological task with second-order effects for maintaining the object–fingertip contact, but also shows how this class of hands that have been considered mostly for adaptive grasping can be successfully utilized for precision grasping. The minimal number of fingers and actuators can simplify the control, resulting in a robust, lightweight, and cost-effective solution for the precision grasping of a variety of objects with different shapes and geometries.

Keywords

Kinematic synthesis with velocity and acceleration task specificationsMechanism designMulti-fingered handsMulti-loop linkagesAnthropomorphic
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 38 , Issue 11 , November 2020 , pp. 1921 - 1939
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Salisbury, J. K. and Craig, J. T., “Articulated hands: Force control and kinematics issues,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 1(1), 4–17 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, S. C., Iversen, E. K., Knutti, D. F., Johnson, R. T. and Biggers, K. B., “Design of the Utah/MIT Dextrous Hand,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, USA, vol. 3 (1986) pp. 1520–1532.Google Scholar
Fukaya, N., Toyama, S., Asfour, T. and Dillmann, R., “Design of the TUAT/Karlsruhe Humanoid Hand,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Takamatsu, Japan, vol. 3 (IEEE, 2000) pp. 1754–1759.Google Scholar
Ambrose, R. O., Aldridge, H., Askew, R. S., Burridge, R. R., Bluethmann, W., Diftler, M., Lovchik, C., Magruder, D. and Rehnmark, F., “Robonaut: NASA’s space humanoid,” IEEE Intelligent Systems 15(4), 57–63 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfab, J., Grebenstein, M., Liu, H. and Hirzinger, G., “DLR-Hand II: Next Generation of a Dextrous Robot Hand,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Seoul, South Korea (2001).Google Scholar
Tuffield, P. and Elias, H., “The shadow robot mimics human actions,” Indust. Robot Int. J 30(1), 56–60 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotti, F. and Vassura, G., “A novel approach to mechanical design of articulated fingers for robotic hands.” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Lausanne, Switzerland, vol. 2 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, N., Paul, R. and Bajcsy, R., “A Medium-Complexity Compliant end Effector,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Philadelphia, PA, USA (1988) pp. 434–436.Google Scholar
Robotiq, 3-fingered adaptive gripper (2016). http://robotiq.com/products/industrial-robot-hand/ (October 20, 2016).Google Scholar
Robotics, Kinova, JACO (2013). http://kinovarobotics.com/products/jaco-robotics/ (October 20, 2016).Google Scholar
Jrgensen, J. A. and Petersen, H. G., “Usage of Simulations to Plan Stable Grasping of Unknown Objects with a 3-Fingered Schunk Hand,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Nice, France (2008).Google Scholar
Dollar, A. M. and Howe, R. D., “The highly adaptive SDM hand: Design and performance evaluation,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 29(5), 585–597 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odhner, L. U., Jentoft, L. P., Claffee, M. R., Corson, N., Tenzer, Y., Ma, R. R. and Dollar, A. M., “A compliant, underactuated hand for robust manipulation,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 33(5), 736–752 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homberg, B. S., Katzschmann, R. K., Dogar, M. R. and Rus, D., “Robust proprioceptive grasping with a soft robot hand,” Auto. Robot. 43(3), 681–696 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birglen, L., Lalibert, T. and Gosselin, C. M., Underactuated Robotic Hands, vol. 40 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007).Google Scholar
Bicchi, A., Gabiccini, M. and Santello, M., “Modeling natural and artificial hands with synergies,” Philosophical Trans. 366(1581), 3153–3161 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santello, M., Flanders, M. and Soechting, J. F., “Postural synergies for tool use,” J. Neurosci. 18(23), 10105–10115 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vulliez, P., Gazeau, J., Laguillaumie, P., Mnyusiwalla, H. and Seguin, P., “Focus on the mechatronics design of a new dexterous robotic hand for inside hand manipulation,” Robotica 36(8), 1206–1224 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heo, P., Gu, G. M., Lee, S., Rhee, K. and Kim, J., “Current hand exoskeleton technologies for rehabilitation and assistive engineering?,” Int.J. Precision Eng. Manuf. 13(5), 807–824 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosselin, C. M. and Laliberte, T., “Underactuated mechanical finger with return actuation,” US Patent 5,762,390.Google Scholar
Baek, S.-E., Lee, S.-H. and Chang, J. H., “Design and Control of a Robotic Finger for Prosthetic Hands,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Kyongju, South Korea, vol. 1 (IEEE, 1999) pp. 113–117.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, E. T., Reinkensmeyer, D. J. and Perez-Gracia, A., “Single Degree-of-Freedom Exoskeleton Mechanism Design for Finger Rehabilitation,” 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Zurich (IEEE, 2011) pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, N. and Soh, G. S., “Geometric design of eight-bar wearable devices based on limb physiological contact task,” Mech. Mach. Theory 100, 358–367 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, G. R., Robson, N. and Soh, G. S., “Motion generation of passive slider multiloop wearable hand devices,” J. Mech. Robot. 9(4), 041011–1 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, N., Allington, J. and Soh, G. S., “’Development of Underactuated Mechanical Fingers Based on Anthropometric Data and Anthropomorphic Tasks,” Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Buffalo, New York (2014).Google Scholar
Ohwovoriole, M. S. and Roth, B., “An extension of screw theory,” J. Mech. Des. 103(4), 725–735 (1981).Google Scholar
Hanafusa, H. and Asada, H., “Stable Prehension by a Robot Hand with Elastic Fingers,” Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, Tokyo, Japan (1977) pp. 384–389.Google Scholar
Cai, C. C. and Roth, B., “On the Spatial Motion of a Rigid Body with a Point Contact,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, NC, USA (1987) pp. 686–695.Google Scholar
Montana, D. J., “The kinematics for contact and grasp,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 7(3), 17–32 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J., Chung, W. and Youm, Y., “Second Order Contact Kinematics for Regular Contacts,” IEEE Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton, Alta (2005) pp. 1723–1729.Google Scholar
Sarkar, N., Yun, S. and Kumar, V., “Dynamic Control of 3D Rolling Contacts in Two Arm Manipulation,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, GA, USA (1993) pp. 978–983.Google Scholar
Trinkle, J. C., “On the stability and instantaneous velocity of grasped frictionless objects,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Auto. 8(5), 560–572 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesar, D. and Sparks, J. W., “The generalized concept of five multiply separated positions in coplanar motion,” J. Mech. 3(1), 25–33 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowler, H. J., Duffy, J. and Tesar, D., “A generalised study of four and five multiply separated positions in spherical kinematics—II,” Mech. Mach. Theory 13(4), 409–435 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimon, E. and Burdick, J. W., “A configuration space analysis of bodies in contact—I. 1st order mobility,” Mech. Mach. Theory 30(6), 897–912 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimon, E. and Burdick, J. W., “A configuration space analysis of bodies in contact—II. 2nd order mobility,” Mech. Mach. Theory 30(6), 913–928 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, N. P. and McCarthy, J. M., “Kinematic Synthesis with Contact Direction and Curvature Constraints on the Workpiece.” Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada (2007).Google Scholar
Robson, N. P. and McCarthy, J. M., “Applications of the Geometric Design of Mechanical Linkages with Task Acceleration Specifications,” ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, San Diego, California (2009).Google Scholar
Robson, N. P. and McCarthy, J. M., “Second order task specifications in the geometric design of spatial mechanical linkages,” Int. J. Modern Eng. 11, 5–11 (2010).Google Scholar
Robson, N. and Tolety, A., “Geometric Design of Spherical Serial Chains with Curvature Constraints in the Environment,” ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Washington, D.C. (2011).Google Scholar
Robson, N. P. and McCarthy, J. M., “Synthesis of a Spatial SS Serial Chain for a Prescribed Acceleration Task,” Proceedings of IFToMM, The 12th World Congress on Mechanism and Machine Science, Besancon, France (2007).Google Scholar
Robson, N. P., McCarthy, J. M. and Tumer, I. Y., “The algebraic synthesis of a spatial TS chain for a prescribed acceleration task,” Mech. Mach. Theory 43(10), 1268–1280 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soh, G. S. and McCarthy, J. M., “Synthesis of Eight-Bar Linkages as Mechanically Constrained Parallel Robots,” 12th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science (IFToMM), Besançon, France (2007) pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
Robson, N. and Tolety, A., “Geometric Design of Spherical Serial Chains with Curvature Constraints in the Environment,” ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference, Washington, D.C. (2011).Google Scholar
Robson, N., Ghosh, S. and McCarthy, J. M., “Simultaneous Geometric Design of Mechanical Fingers for Coordinated Movement,” 14th IFToMM World Congress, Taipei, Taiwan (2015).Google Scholar
Soh, G.S. and Robson, N., “Kinematic Synthesis of Minimally Actuated Multi-Loop Planar Linkages with Second Order Motion Constraints for Object Grasping,” Proceedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, Paolo Alto, California (2013).Google Scholar
Cutkosky, M., Jourdain, J. and Wright, P., “Skin Materials for Robotic Fingers,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, NC, USA, vol. 4 (1987).Google Scholar
Markenscoff, X., Ni, L. and Papadimitriou, C. H., “The geometry of grasping,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 9(1), 61–74 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciocarlie, M., Miller, A. and Allen, P., “Grasp Analysis using Deformable Fingers,” IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton, Alta (2005).Google Scholar
Cutkosky, M. R. and Howe, R. D., “Human Grasp Choice and Robotic Grasp Analysis,” In: Dextrous Robot Hands (Venkataraman, S. T. and Iberall, T. eds.) (Springer, New York, 1990) pp. 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirtich, B. and Canny, J., “Easily Computable Optimum Grasps in 2-D and 3-D,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA, USA (1994).Google Scholar
Chinellato, E., Morales, A., Fisher, R. B. and del Pobil, A. P., “Visual quality measures for characterizing planar robot grasps,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 35(1), 30–41 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponce, J. and Faverjon, B., “On computing three-finger force-closure grasps of polygonal objects,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Auto. 11(6), 868–881 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, B., Oh, S., Yi, B. and Suh, I. H., “Optimal Grasping based on Non-dimensionalized Performance Indices,” Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Maui, HI, USA (2001).Google Scholar
Surez, R., Cornella, J. and Garzn, M. R., “Grasp quality measures,” Institut d’Organitzaci i Control de Sistemes Industrials (2006).Google Scholar
Bicchi, A., “On the closure properties of robotic Grasping,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 14(4), 319–344 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, A., Driemeyer, J. and Ng, A., “Robotic grasping of novel objects using vision,” J. Robot. Res. 27(2), 157–173 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, A., Chinellato, E., Fagg, A. and del Pobil, A., “Experimental Prediction of the Performance of Grasps Tasks from Visual Features,” Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (2003) pp. 3423–3428.Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, R., Xu, L., Brook, P. D., Smith, J. R. and Matsuoka, Y., “Physical human interactive guidance: Identifying grasping principles from human planned grasps,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 28(4), 899–910 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Iwamoto, K., Kuffner, J., Ota, Y. and Pollard, N., “Physically based grasp quality evaluation under pose uncertainty,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 29(6), 1424–1439 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar