Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T05:21:11.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental evaluation of open-loop swimming control for a robotic fish using electrostatic film motors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Norio Yamashita ,
Zu Guang Zhang ,
Akio Yamamoto ,
Masahiko Gondo  and
Toshiro Higuchi
Norio Yamashita
Affiliation:
Department of Pricision Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Zu Guang Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510, Japan
Akio Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Department of Pricision Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Masahiko Gondo
Affiliation:
SEIDENSHA Corporation, SIC-2-404, 5-4-21 Nishi-Hashimoto, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
Toshiro Higuchi
Affiliation:
Department of Pricision Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We have developed an underwater robotic fish using a unique three-layer electrostatic film motor. In the robotic fish, the unique motor actuates a flexible caudal fin to propel the robot via an elaborate power transmission system. In the present study, we describe the major disadvantages of the previous prototype of the robotic fish and improvements of the prototype. In addition, we present experimental evaluations related to the control parameters and locomotion performance of the robotic fish. These control parameters include the frequency and initial phase of AC voltage, and the amplitude and period of frequency sweeping. A simple theoretical model concerning the power transmission system of the robotic fish is also analyzed to provide a possible explanation for the unique swimming control. By appropriately adjusting these control parameters, we achieve cruising, emerging, submerging, and turning of the robotic fish even though only the caudal fin is active. Finally, we show smooth human-operated turn-around motion similar to that seen in real fish. Based on these experimental results, we further clarify the relationships between the open-loop motor pattern and motion parameters.

Keywords

robotic fish3-lyaer electrostatic film motorpower transmission modelopen-loop swimming controlexperimental evaluation
Type
Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , May 2010 , pp. 369 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Breder, C. M., “The locomotion of fishes,” Zoologica 4, 159–256 (1926).Google Scholar
2.Colgate, J. E. and Lynch, K. M., “Mechanics and control of swimming: A review,” IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 29 (3), 660–673 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sfakiotakis, M., Lane, D. M. and Davies, J. B. C., “Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion,” IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 24, 237–252 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Triantafyllou, M. S. and Triantafyllou, G. S., “An efficient swimming vehicle,” Sci. Am. 272, 40–46 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Yamamoto, I. and Terada, Y., “Robotic Fish and its Technology,” Proceedings of SICE Annual Conference, Fukui, Japan (2003) pp. 342–345.Google Scholar
6.Hirata, K., “Development of Experimental Fish Robot,” Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Marine Engineering, Tokyo, Japan (2000) pp. 711–714.Google Scholar
7.Liu, J. D. and Hu, H. S., “Mimicry of Sharp Turning Behaviours in a Robotic Fish,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain (2005) pp. 3329–3334.Google Scholar
8.Liu, J. D., Dukes, I. and Hu, H. S., “Novel Mechatronics Design for a Robotic Fish,” Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton, Canada (2005) pp. 2077–2082.Google Scholar
9.Lachat, D., Crespi, A. and Ijspeert, A. J., “Boxybot: A Swimming and Crawling Fish Robot Controlled by a Central Pattern Generator,” Proceedings of IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Pisa, Italy (2006).Google Scholar
10.Kodati, P., Hinkle, J. and Deng, X., “Micro Autonomous Robotic Ostraciiform (marco): Design and Fabrication,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Rome, Italy (2007) pp. 960–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Barrett, D. S., Triantafyllou, M. S., Yue, D. K. P., Grosenbaugh, M. A. and Wolfgang, M. J., “Drag reduction in fish-like locomotion,” J. Fluid Mech. 392, 183–212 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Guo, S., Fukuda, T. and Asaka, K., “A new type of fish-like underwater microrobot,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 8, 136–141 (2003).Google Scholar
13.Shinjo, N. and Swain, G. W., “The use of shape memory alloy for the design of oscillatory propulsion system,” IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 29, 750–755 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Borgen, M. G., Washington, G. N. and Kinzel, G. L., “Design and evolution of a piezoelectrically actuated miniature swimming vehicle,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 8, 66–74 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Naciri, J., Srinivasan, A., Sandberg, W., Ramamurti, R. and Ratna, B., “Nematic Liquid Crystal Elastomers as Artificial Muscles,” Proceedings of International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology, Durham, USA (2003) pp. 295–299.Google Scholar
16.Paquette, J. and Kim, K. J., “Ionomeric electro-active polymer artificial muscle for naval applications,” IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 29, 729–737 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Niino, T., Yamamoto, A. and Higuchi, T., “Operation of a dual excitation multiphase electrostatic drive by amplitude-modulated ac voltage,” Electr. Eng. Japan 131 (4), 78–84 (2000).3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Yamamoto, A., Niino, T. and Higuchi, T., “Modeling and identification of an electrostatic motor,” Precis. Eng. 30, 104–113 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Yamashita, N., Zhang, Z. G., Yamamoto, A., Gondo, M. and Higuchi, T., “Voltage-induction type electrostatic film motor driven by two- to four-phase ac voltage and electrostatic induction,” Sensors Actuators: A 140 (2), 239–250 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Zhang, Z. G., Yamashita, N., Gondo, M., Yamamoto, A. and Higuchi, T., “Electrostatically actuated robotic fish: Design and control for high-mobility open-loop swimming,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 24 (1), 118–129 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Zhang, Z. G., Yamashita, N., Yamamoto, A. and Higuchi, T., “Development of a robotic fish using electrostatic film motors: The seidengyo II robot,” Adv. Robot. 21 (15), 1787–1803 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Dickinson, M. H., Farley, C. T., Full, R. J., Koehl, M. A. R., Kram, R. and Lehman, S., “How animals move: An integrative view,” Science 288, 100–106 (2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed