Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T07:28:12.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of a gecko-like robotic gripper using Scott–Russell mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2019

Mehdi Modabberifar*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Arak University, Arak, Iran
Matthew Spenko
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Materials, and Aerospace Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

This paper describes the development of a gecko-inspired robotic gripper for grasping flat objects using Scott–Russell mechanisms. Compared to previously reported grippers that utilize gecko-like adhesives, the one presented here produces higher normal adhesion and has robustness and controllability advantages. To verify the applicability of proposed gripper, a mechanical model and experimental results on a variety of substrates are presented. The experimental results demonstrated a 19.6% and 50% increase in normal adhesion using a preload of <15 and <30 N, respectively, compared to previously reported results under similar testing parameters and conditions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Parness, A., Kennedy, B. A.,Heverly, M. C.,Cutkosky, M. R. and Hawkes, E.W., “Grippers based on opposing van der waals adhesive pads,” US Patent 9,517,610 (Dec. 13 2016).Google Scholar
Autumn, K., Dittmore, A., Santos, D., Spenko, M. and Cutkosky, M., “Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment,” J. Exp. Biol. 209(18), 35693579 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, D.,Spenko, M., Parness, A., Kim, S. and Cutkosky, M., “Directional adhesion for climbing: theoretical and practical considerations,” J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 21(12–13), 13171341 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geim, A. K., Dubonos, S., Grigorieva, I., Novoselov, K., Zhukov, A. and Shapoval, S. Y., “Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair,” Nat. Mater. 2(7), 461 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, M. P., Kim, S. andSitti, M., “Enhanced adhesion by gecko-inspired hierarchical fibrillar adhesives,”ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 1(4), 849855 (2009).Google Scholar
Del Campo, A., Greiner, C. and Arzt, E., “Contact shape controls adhesion of bioinspired fibrillar surfaces,”Langmuir 23(20), 1023510243 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parness, A., Soto, D., Esparza, N., Gravish, N., Wilkinson, M., Autumn, K. and Cutkosky, M., “A microfabricatedwedge-shaped adhesive array displaying gecko-like dynamic adhesion, directionality and long lifetime,” J. Royal Soc. Interface 6, 12231232 (2009) rsif–2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dadkhah, M., Zhao, Z., Wettels, N. and Spenko, M., “A Self-Aligning Gripper Using an Electrostatic/Geckolike Adhesive,” 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Daejeon, Korea (IEEE, 2016), pp. 10061011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, P., Suresh, S. A., Ruffatto, D., Cutkosky, M., Tolley, M. T. and Parness, A., “A soft robotic gripper with gecko-inspired adhesive,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 3(2), 903910 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, H., Hawkes, E. W., Fuller, C., Estrada, M. A., Suresh, S. A., Abcouwer, N., Han, A. K., Wang, S., Ploch, C. J., Parness, A. and Cutkosky, M. R., “A robotic device using gecko-inspired adhesives can grasp and manipulate large objects in microgravity,” Sci. Robot. 2(7), eaan4545 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, E. W., Jiang, H. and Cutkosky, M. R., “Three-dimensional dynamic surface grasping with dry adhesion,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 35(8), 943958 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modabberifar, M. and Spenko, M., “A shape memory alloy-actuated gecko-inspired robotic gripper,” Sens. Actuat. A Phys. 276, 7682 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar