Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:50:21.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development and methodology for the formal evaluation of the Neil Squire Foundation robotic-assistive appliance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Gary E. Birch
Gary E. Birch
Affiliation:
Neil Squire Foundation, 4381 Gallant Avenue, North Vancouver B.C. V7G 1L1 (Canada)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is expected that an appropriate robotic appliance can play a major role in providing long periods of independence, which in turn will lead to improved quality of life, for people who are severely physically limited. As part of its research programme over the past several years the Neil Squire Foundation has been developing a workstation-based robotic assistive appliance (RAA) for use by such persons. We feel that robotic aids initially will have their most profound impact when applied in a vocational environment. Although other rehabilitation researchers have similar interests there is a great need for the utility of robots in these environments to be more fully substantiated and assessed. A formal evaluation process currently is under way in an attempt to quantify and to understand the cost/benefit results of using the RAA in office situations.

Keywords

RehabilitationRobotic-assistive applianceNeil Squire FoundationDisability
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 11 , Issue 6 , November 1993 , pp. 529 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.van der Loos, H.F.M., Hammel, J., Lees, D., Chang, D. and Perkash, I., “Field evaluation of a robot workstation for quadriplegic office workers” European Revue of Biomedical Technology 12, No. 5, 317–318 (1990).Google Scholar
2.Birch, G. E. and Cameron, W., “User Acceptability in Robotic Assistive Devices” Proceedings of the 1990 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (Alfred I. duPont Institute, Wilmington Delaware, USA, 06 14–15, 1990) pp. 65–75.Google Scholar
3.Birch, G. E., Cameron, W., Fengler, M., Young, J., Carpenter, A., and Apkarian, J. “Regenesis Robotic Manipulator for Persons with Severe Disabilities” European Revue of Biomedical Technology 12, No. 5, 320–323 (1990).Google Scholar
4.Cameron, W. and Birch, G., “A Low Cost General Purpose Manipulative Appliance for the Severely Disabled” Proceedings of the Rehabilitation Society of North America(06, 1984).Google Scholar
5.Cameron, W., Birch, G., Fengler, M., Young, J., Carpenter, A.Mclntyre, C. and McKay, K., “Capitalizing on Robot Technology”, RESNA – Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference, June 17–19, 1990 Washington, D.C. pp. 331–332.Google Scholar
6.van der Loos, M., Hammel, J., Lees, D., Chang, D., Perkash, I. and Leifer, L., “A Voice-Controlled Robot System as a Quadriplegic Programmer's Assistant” Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of RESNA(06 15–20, 1990) pp. 129–130. 12.Google Scholar
7.Seamone, W. and Schmeisser, G., “Evaluation of the APL/JHU Robot Arm Workstation” Resna 9th Anual Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota1986 pp. 252–253.Google Scholar
8.Leifer, L. et al. , “Development and Evaluation of a Robotic Aid for the Severely Disabled Individual” Rehabilitation Research and Development Centre (VA Medical Centre, Palo Alto, CA., Section 6.3.15; 1984).Google Scholar
9.Schneider, W., Schmeisser, G. and Seamone, W., “Computer-Aided Robotic Arm/Worktable System for the High-Level Quadripletic” IEEE Computer 41–47 (01, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Brown, H., “Making the World More Forgiving; Engineers Develop Technology for the Disabled” Research Horizons at Georia Tech (Fall 1986) pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
11.Hammel, J., Hall, K., Lees, D., Leifer, L., van der Loos, M., Perkash, I. and Crigler, R., “Clinical Evaluation of a Desktop Robotic Assistant” J. Rehab. Research and Development 26, No. 3, 1–16 (Summer, 1989).Google ScholarPubMed
12.van der Loos, M., Hammel, J., Lees, D., Chang, D., Perkash, I. and Leifer, L., “A Voice-Controlled Robot System as a Quadriplegic Programmer's Assistant” Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of RESNA(06 15–20, 1990) pp. 129–130.Google Scholar
13.Hammel, M., “A Vocational Assessment Model for Use of Robotics Technology” Proceedings of the 13th Annual conference of RESNA(06 15–20, 1990) pp. 327–328.Google Scholar
14. “PRAB Command Launched with a Flurry of Activity “Positively Speaking Newsletter, (Sept., 1988).Google Scholar
15.Fu, C., “An Independent Vocational Workstation for a Quadriplegic” RESNA 9th Annual Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota(1986) pp. 182–184.Google Scholar
16.Isermann, R., Digital Control Systems, Volume I, Fundamentals, Deterministic Control, 2nd Revised Edition (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1981).Google Scholar
17.Fengler, M. and Cameron, W., “Clinical Testing of a Low Cost Robotic Arm for the Severely Disabled” Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Robotic Applications in Medicine and Health Care (Sponsored by the National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 06, 1988).Google Scholar
18.Edwards, R., “Rehabilitation Robotics Workshop: Safety Aspects” Draft of Proceedings of Rehabilitation Robotics Workshop, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England(April 12–14, 1991).Google Scholar
19.Regalbuto, M. A., Krouskop, T. A. and Cheatham, J. B., “Toward a practical mobile robotic aid system for people with severe physical disabilities” J. Rehabilitation Research and Development 29, No. 1, 19–26 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Davies, B. L., “Rehabilitation Robotics Workshop: Safety Issues in Rehabilitation Robotics” Draft of Proceedings of Rehabilitation Robotics Workshop, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England(April 12–14, 1991).Google Scholar
21.Kwee, H. H., Duimel, J. J., van Woerden, J. A., Driessen, B. J. F., Kolk, L.W. v. d., Rosier, J.C., de Moed, A. A. Tuinhof and van, R. J. M. der Burght, “The Manus Telethesis: A Progress Report” Draft of Proceedings of Rehabilitation Robotics Workshop, University of Cambridge, Cambridge England(April 12–14, 1991).Google Scholar
22.Leifer, Larry, “Development of a Visual Language for Assistive Robot Command-Control” Draft of Proceedings of Rehabilitation Robotics Workshop, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England(April 12–14, 1991).Google Scholar
23.Atomic, French Energy Commission, Advanced Technologies Division, Robotics Unit, “Research and Development Programs for the Handicapped People” Draft of Proceedings of Rehabilitation Robotics Workshop, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England(April 12–14, 1991).Google Scholar
24.Kyberd, P., “Research at the Oxford Orthopaedic Engineering Centre” Draft of Proceedings of Rehabilitation Robotics Workshop, University of Cambridge, Cambridge England(April 12–14, 1991).Google Scholar
25.Burrow, Michael F. and Single, Thomas G., “The Georgia Tech Robotic Manipulator: A Six Degree of Freedom Arm for Rehabilitation Applications” Proc. 1990 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, A.I. duPont Institute, Wilmington, Delaware, USA(June, 1990) pp. 41–51.Google Scholar