Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:03:16.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cascade control of hydraulically actuated manipulators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

N. Sepehri
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B. C. (Canada).
G.A.M. Dumont
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B. C. (Canada).
P.D. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B. C. (Canada).
F. Sassani
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B. C. (Canada).

Summary

A fundamental study on the control of hydraulically actuated robots is presented. Dynamic modelling is performed in both time-domain and frequency-domain. It is shown that the inclusion of hydraulic elements increases the order of the system. Hydraulic compliance is the most effective factor in this regard.

Three distinct control strategies are applied. Their performances are evaluated and compared. All three methods are exemplified with a two link hydraulic robot in a computer simulation. The robot has the same hydraulic configuration as many existing industrial manipulators. The simulation program is written in ACSL (Advanced Continuous Simulation Language) running on a VAX 11/750.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Davies, B.L. and Ihnatowicz, E., “Hydraulic power for industrial robot manipulators” Proc. 6th International Fluid Power Symposium (Cambridge, England) 361372 (04 8–10, 1981).Google Scholar
2.Hanafusa, H., Asada, H. and Mikoshi, T., “Design of Electro-hydraulic Servo System for Articulated Robot Arm Control” Proc. the IFAC Symposium (Warsaw, Poland) 223228 (05 20–23, 1980).Google Scholar
3.Rivin, E.I., “Effective rigidity of robot structure: analysis and enhancementProc. the American Control Conf. (Boston, MA) 381383 (06 19–21, 1985).Google Scholar
4.Merrit, H.E., Hydraulic Control Systems (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
5.Watton, J., “The dynamic performance of an Electro-hydraulic servovalve/motor system with transmission line effectsASME, J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 190, 1418 (03, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Paul, R.P., Robot Manipulators, Mathematics, Programming and Control, (Cambridge MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1983).Google Scholar
7.Browns, D.E., Tomlinson, S.P. and Dugdale, S.K., “Progress towards a general purpose hydraulic system simulation language” Proc. 6th International Fluid Power Symposium (Cambridge, England) 115131 (04 8–10, 1981).Google Scholar
8.lyengar, S.K.R. and Fitch, E.C., “A systematic approach to the analysis of complex fluid power systems” Proc. 4th International Fluid Power Symposium (Sheffield, England) A219–A234 (04 16–18, 1975).Google Scholar
9.Siljak, D., Nonlinear Systems (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1968).Google Scholar
10.Leininger, G.G., “Adaptive Control of Manipulators Using Self-Tuning Methods” Proc. International Symposium of Robotic Research (New Hampshire, USA) 801816 (08 29–09 2, 1983).Google Scholar
11.Koivo, A.J. and Guo, T.H., “Adaptive Linear Control for Robotic ManipulatorsIEEE Transaction on Automatic Control AC-28, No. 2, 233242 (02 1983).Google Scholar
12.Clarke, D.W., “Implementation of Self-Tuning Controller”, Numerical Techniques for Stochastic Systems (Archetti, and Cugiani, , eds.) (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1980).Google Scholar