Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:19:07.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis, simulation, and implementation of a human-inspired pole climbing robot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2011

A. Sadeghi ,
H. Moradi  and
M. Nili Ahmadabadi
A. Sadeghi
Affiliation:
Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Room 709, North Kargar St. Tehran, Iran14395-515
H. Moradi*
Affiliation:
Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Room 709, North Kargar St. Tehran, Iran14395-515
M. Nili Ahmadabadi
Affiliation:
Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Room 709, North Kargar St. Tehran, Iran14395-515
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this paper, we present the design, static analysis, simulation, and implementation of a novel design for a naturally stable climbing robot that has been inspired from human pole/tree climbers. The other benefits of this robot, besides being naturally stable, are its simple design, ease of control, light weight, simple mechanism, and fast climbing speed. The robot consists of three wheels, two free and one active wheel, which enable the robot to climb or descend poles. The free wheels are almost frictionless, while the active wheel has enough friction to be able to apply force on the pole for stable climbing or descending. The wheels are designed in V-shape such that the robot can compensate for misplacements eliminating possible detachment from poles. Although the robot can operate with a single free wheel, however, an extra free wheel is added to increase the stability and safety of the robot. In this paper, the static analysis of the robot is presented and the robot is simulated. Furthermore, the robot is actually implemented and successfully tested in two sizes, a small size and a big/full size. The full-scale prototype has been equipped with washing and inspection tools and tested washing actual street lights. The results show the unique characteristics of this robot that make it more stable if more weight is carried.

Keywords

DesignService robotsNovel applications of roboticsTeleoperationBiomimetic robotsPole climbing robots
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , March 2012 , pp. 279 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Krasnoslobodtsev, V. and Langevin, R., “Triz Application in Development of Climbing Robots,” First TRIZ Symposium, Japan (Sep. 2005).Google Scholar
2.Zhang, H., Zhang, J. and Zong, G., “Effective pneumatic scheme and control strategy of a climbing robot for class wall cleaning on high-rise building,” Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 3 (2), 183–190 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Menon, C. and Sitti, M., “A biomimetic climbing robot based on the gecko,” J. Biomic Eng. 3, 115–125 (2006).Google Scholar
4.Baghani, A., Ahmadabadi, M. Nili and Harati, A., “Kinematics Modeling of Wheel-Based Pole Climbing Robot (UT-PCR),” Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Intelligent Systems, Beijing, China (2006) pp. 5007–5012.Google Scholar
5.White, T., Hewer, N., Luk, B. and Hazel, J. “The Design and Operational Performance of a Climbing Robot Used for Weld Inspection in Hazardous Environments,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Trieste, Italy (Sep. 1–4, 1998) pp. 451–455.Google Scholar
6.Luk, B., Cooke, D., Galt, S., Collie, A. and Chen, S., “Intelligent legged climbing service robot for remote maintenance applications in hazardous environments,” Int. J. Robot. Auton. Syst. 53 (2), 142–152 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Tavakoli, M., Zakerzadeh, M. R., Vossughi, G. R. and Bagheri, S., “Design and Prototyping of a Hybrid Pole Climbing and Manipulating Robot with Minimum DOFs for Construction and Service Applications,” Proceedings of the Climbing and Walking Robots (CLAWAR), Madrid, Spain (2004) pp. 1071–1076.Google Scholar
8.Degani, A., Choset, H. and Mason, M. T., “DSAC—Dynamic, Single Actuated Climber. Local Stability and Bifurcations,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, AK (2010) pp. 2803–2809.Google Scholar
9.Abderrahim, M., Balaguer, C., Gimenez, A., Pastor, J. M. and Padron, V.M., “ROMA: A Climbing Robot for Inspection Operations,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, Michigan (1999) pp. 2303–2308.Google Scholar
10.Bonaccorso, F., Bruno, C., Longo, D. and Muscato, G., “Structure and Model Identification of a VORTEX-Based Suction Cup,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots and the Support Technologies for Mobile Machines, Coimbra, Portugal (Sep. 8–10, 2008) pp. 303–310.Google Scholar
11.Haynes, G. C., Khripin, A., Lynch, G., Amory, J., Saunders, A., Rizzi, A. and Koditschek, D. E., “Rapid Pole Climbing with a Quadrupedal Robot,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe, Japan (May 2009) pp. 2767–2772.Google Scholar
12.Balaguer, C., Gimenes, A., Pastor, J., Padron, V. and Abderrahim, C., “A climbing autonomous robot for inspection application in 3D complex environments,” Robotica 18 (3), 287–297 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Xu, Z. and Ma, P., “A wall-climbing robot for labeling scale of oil tank's volume,” Robotica 20 (2), 203–207 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.La Rosa, G., Messina, M., Muscato, G. and Sinatra, R., “A low cost lightweight climbing robot for the inspection of vertical surfaces,” Mechatronics 12 (1), 71–96 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lal Tummala, R., Mukherjee, R., Xi, N., Aslam, D., Dulimarta, H., Xiao, J., Minor, M. and Dang, G., “Climbing the walls,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 9 (4), 10–19 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Zhu, J., Sun, D. and Tso, S., “Development of a tracked climbing robot,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 35 (4), 427–444 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Bretl, T., “Motion planning of multi-limbed robots subject to equilibrium constraints: The free-climbing robot problem,” Int. J.Robot. Res. 25 (4), 317–342 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Kennedy, B., Okon, A., Aghazarian, H., Badescu, M., Bao, X., Barcohen, Y., Chang, Z., Dabiri, B., Garrett, M., Magnone, L. and Sherrit, S., “Lemur iib: A Robotic System for Steep Terrain Access,” Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots, London, UK (2005).Google Scholar
19.Lipkin, K., Brown, I., Peck, A., Choset, H., Rembisz, J., Gianfortoni, P. and Naaktgeboren, A., “Differentiable and Piecewise Differentiable Gaits for Snake Robots,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference of Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Diego, CA (Nov. 2007) pp. 1864–1869.Google Scholar
20.McKenna, J., Anhalt, D., Bronson, F., Brown, H., Schwerin, M., Shammas, E. and Choset, H., “Toroidal Skin Drive for Snake Robot Locomotion,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA (May 2008).Google Scholar
21.Fauroux, J. C. and Morillon, J., “Design of a climbing robot for cylindro-conic poles based on rolling self-locking,” Ind. Robot-An Int. J. 37 (3), 297–292 (2010).Google Scholar