Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T20:03:52.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of successes and failures with a tele-operated mobile robot in various modes of operation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2011

David Adrian Sanders TD ,
Ian Stott ,
David Robinson  and
David Ndzi
David Adrian Sanders TD*
Affiliation:
Systems and Knowledge Engineering, Systems Engineering Research Group, University of Portsmouth, Anglesea Road Building, Anglesea Road, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 3DJ, UK
Ian Stott
Affiliation:
Officer Commanding D Company 3 PWRR, TAC, Peronne Close, Portsmouth, PO3 5LG
David Robinson
Affiliation:
Systems Engineering, Systems Engineering Research Group, University of Portsmouth, Anglesea Road Building, Anglesea Road, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 3DJ, UK
David Ndzi
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Anglesea Road Building Anglesea Road, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 3DJ, UK
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect on failure rates of the way tele-operators interact with mobile robots is investigated. Human tele-operators attempted to move a robot through progressively more complicated environments with reducing gaps, as quickly as possible. Tele-operators used a joystick and either watched robots, while operating them, or used a computer screen to view scenes remotely. Cameras were either mounted on the robot to view the space ahead of the robot or mounted remotely so that they viewed both the environment and robot. Tele-operators completed tests both with and without sensors. Both an umbilical cable and a radio link were used.

Keywords

Tele-OperationMobile RobotSensorUltra-Sonic
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 30 , Issue 6 , October 2012 , pp. 973 - 988
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Sanders, D. A., “Comparing speed to complete progressively more difficult mobile robot paths between human tele-operators and humans with sensor systems to assist,” Assem. Autom. —29 (3), 230–248 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Nakamura, T. and Satoh, K., “Development of an omni-directional mobile robot using travelling waves based on snail locomotion,” Ind. Robot 35 (3), 206–210 (2008).Google Scholar
3.Sanders, D., Tewkesbury, G. and Stott, I. J. et al. , “Simple expert systems to improve an ultrasonic sensor-system for a tele-operated mobile-robot,” Sensor Rev. J. 31 (3), 246–260 (2011).Google Scholar
4.Fischer, W., Caprari, G. and Siegwart, R. et al. , “Foldable magnetic wheeled climbing robot for the inspection of gas turbines and similar environments with very narrow access holes,” Ind. Robot 37 (3), 244–249 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Sanders, D. A., Graham-Jones, J. and Gegov, A., “Improving ability of tele-operators to complete progressively more difficult mobile robot paths using simple expert systems and ultrasonic sensors,” Ind. Robot 37 (5), 431–440 (2010).Google Scholar
6.Goodwin, M. J., Sanders, D. A. and Poland, G. A. et al. , “Navigational assistance for disabled wheelchair-users,” J. Syst. Archit. 43 (1–5), 73–79 (1997).Google Scholar
7.Sanders, D. A., Langner, M., Tewkesbury, G. E., “Improving wheelchair-driving using a sensor system to control wheelchair-veer and variable-switches as an alternative to digital-switches or joysticks,” Ind. Robot 37 (2), 157–167 (2010).Google Scholar
8.Desbats, P., Geffard, F., Piolain, G. and Coudray, A., “Force-feedback teleoperation of an Ind Rob in a nuclear spent fuel reprocessing plant,” Ind. Robot 33 (3), 178–186 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Bloss, R., “How do you decommission a nuclear installation?,” Ind. Robot 37 (2), 133–136 (2010).Google Scholar
10.Marques, C., Cristóvão, J., Alvito, P., Lima, P., Frazão, J., Ribeiro, I. and Ventura, R., “A search and rescue robot with tele-operated tether docking system,” Ind. Robot 34 (4), 332–338 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Sanders, D., “Comparing ability to complete simple tele-operated rescue or maintenance mobile-robot tasks with and without a sensor system,” Sensor Rev. J. 30 (1)40–50 (2010),Google Scholar
12.Trevai, C., Ota, J. and Arai, T., “Multiple mobile robot surveillance in unknown environments,” Adv. Robot. 21 (7), 729–749 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Bogue, R., “Recent developments in miniature flying robots,” Ind. Robot 37 (1), 17–22 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Kusuda, Y., “Robots at the International Robot Exhibition 2009 in Tokyo,” Ind. Robot 37 (3), 234–238 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lee, K. H. and Seo, C. J., “Development of User-Friendly Intelligent Home Robot Focused on Safety and Security,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2010) (2010) pp. 389–392.Google Scholar
16.Connolly, C., “Industrial inspection,” Sensor Rev. J. 30 (2), 107–110 (2010).Google Scholar
17.Huang, Y., Cao, Q. and Leng, C., “The path-tracking controller based on dynamic model with slip for one four-wheeled OMR,” Ind. Robot 37 (2), 193–201 (2010).Google Scholar
18.Sanders, D., “Analysis of the effects of time delay on the tele-operation of a mobile robot in various modes of operation,” Ind. Robot 36 (6), 570–584 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Luk, B. L., Cooke, D. S., Galt, S., Collie, A. A. and Chen, S., “Intelligent legged climbing service robot for remote maintenance applications in hazardous environments,” J. Robot. Auton. Syst. 53 (2), 142–52 (2005).Google Scholar
20.Sanders, D. A., Haynes, B. P. and Tewkesbury, G. E. et al. , “The addition of neural networks to the inner feedback path in order to improve on the use of pre-trained feed forward estimators,” Math. Comput. Simul. 41 (5–6), 461–472 (1996).Google Scholar
21.Loughlin, C., “Science, art, magic and expert systems,” Ind. Robot 37 (6), 496–496 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Sanders, D. A. and Tewkesbury, G. E., “Improvements in real time high-level microcomputer control of a wheelchair using sensor systems,” Displays 30 (2), 84–96 (2009).Google Scholar
23.Sanders, D. A. and Rasol, Z., “An Automatic System for Simple Spot Welding Tasks,” In: Total vehicle technology: Challenging current thinking (Childs, P. R. N. and Stobart, R. K., eds.) (Professional Engineering Publishing, 2001) pp. 263–272.Google Scholar
24.Sanders, D. and Baldwin, A., “X-by-wire technology,” In: Total vehicle technology: Challenging current thinking (Childs, P. R. N. and Stobart, R. K., eds.) (Professional Engineering Publishing, 2001) pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
25.Sanders, D. A. and Stott, I. J., “A new prototype intelligent mobility system to assist powered wheelchair users,” Ind. Robot 26 (6), 466–475 (1999).Google Scholar
26.Sanders, D. A., Urwin-Wright, S. D. and Tewkesbury, G. E. et al. , “Pointer device for thin-film transistor and cathode ray tube computer screens,” Electron. Lett. 41 (16), pp 894–896 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Stott, I. J., Sanders, D. A. and Goodwin, M. J., A software algorithm for the intelligent mixing of inputs to a tele-operated vehicle,” J. Syst. Archit. 43 (1–5), 67–72 (1997).Google Scholar
28.Sanders, D. A., “Controlling the direction of “walkie” type forklifts and pallet jacks on sloping ground,” Assem. Autom. 28 (4), 317–324 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Sanders, D. A., “Improving wheelchair-driving using a sensor system to control wheelchair-veer and variable-switches as an alternative to digital-switches or joysticks,” Ind. Robot 37 (2), 157–167 (2010).Google Scholar
30.Stott, I. J. and Sanders, D. A., “The use of virtual reality to train powered wheelchair users and test new wheelchair systems,” Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 23 (4), 321–326 (2000).Google Scholar
31.Peng, G., Yu, H. and Liu, X. et al. , “A desktop virtual reality-based integrated system for complex product maintainability design and verification,” Assem. Autom. J. 30 (4), 333–344 (2010).Google Scholar
32.Fauroux, J. C. and Morillon, J., “Design of a climbing robot for cylindro-conic poles based on rolling self-locking,” Ind. Robot 37 (3), 287–292 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Sanders, D. A., Lambert, G. and Graham-Jones, J. et al. , “A robotic welding system using image processing techniques and a CAD model to provide information to a multi-intelligent decision module,” Assem. Autom. J. 30 (4), 323–332 (2010).Google Scholar
34.Loughlin, C., “Deep water robots,” Ind. Robot J. 37 (5), 419–419(2010).Google Scholar
35.Sanders, D. A., Lambert, G. and Pevy, L., “Pre-locating corners in images in order to improve the extraction of Fourier descriptors and subsequent recognition of shipbuilding parts,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B, J. Eng. Manuf. 223 (9), 1217–1223 (2009).Google Scholar
36.Sanders, D. A., “Recognising shipbuilding parts using ANNs and Fourier descriptors,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 223 (3), 337–342 (2009).Google Scholar
37.Sanders, D. A., “Real time geometric modelling using models in an actuator space and Cartesian space,” J Robot. Syst. 12 (1), 19–28 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Loughlin, C., “Machine man interfaces,” Ind. Robot 37 (2), 124–124 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Stott, I. J. and Sanders, D. A., “New powered wheelchair systems for the rehabilitation of some severely disabled users,” Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 23 (3), 149–153 (2000).Google Scholar
40.Sanders, D. A., Hudson, A. D. and Tewkesbury, G. E. et al. , “Automating the design of high-recirculation airlift reactors using a blackboard framework,” Expert Syst. Appl. 3 (18), 231–245 (2000).Google Scholar
41.Hudson, A. D., Sanders, D. A. and Golding, H. et al. , “Aspects of an expert design system for the wastewater treatment industry,” J. Syst. Archit. 43 (1–5), 59–65 (1997).Google Scholar
42.Chester, S., Tewkesbury, G., Sanders, D. A. et al. , “New electronic multi-media assessment system,” Web Inf. Syst. Technol. 1, 414–420 (2007).Google Scholar
43.Bergasa-Suso, J., Sandersand, D. A.Tewkesbury, G. E., “Intelligent browser-based systems to assist Internet users,” IEEE Tran. (E) 48 (4), 580–585 (2005).Google Scholar
44.Sanders, D. A. and Hudson, A. D., “A specific blackboard expert system to simulate and automate the design of high recirculation airlift reactors,” Math. Comput. Simul. 53 (1–2), 41–65 (2000).Google Scholar
45.Sanders, D., “Environmental sensors and networks of sensors,” Sensor Rev. J. 28 (4), 273–274 (2008).Google Scholar
46.Golby, J., “Advances in inductive position sensor technology,” Sensor Rev. J. 30 (2), 142–147 (2010).Google Scholar
47.Erwin-Wright, S., Sanders, D. and Chen, S., “Predicting terrain contours using a feed-forward neural network,” Eng. Appl. 16 (5–6), 465–472 (2003).Google Scholar
48.Tewkesbury, G. E. and Sanders, D. A., “The Use of Distributed Intelligence within Advanced Production Machinery for Design Applications,” In: Total Vehicle Technology: Challenging Current Thinking (Childs, P. R. N. and Stobart, R. K., eds.) (Professional Engineering Publishing, 2001) pp. 255–262.Google Scholar
49.Tewkesbury, G. and Sanders, D., “A new robot command library which includes simulation,” Ind. Robot 26 (1), 39–48 (1999).Google Scholar
50.Urwin-Wright, S., Sanders, D. and Chen, S., “Terrain prediction for an eight-legged robot,” J. Robot. Syst. 19 (2), 91–98 (2002).Google Scholar
51.Martinez, B. H., Herrero-Perez, D., “Development of a flexible AGV for flexible manufacturing systems,” Ind. Robot 37 (5), 459–468 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52.Zhang, M., Liu, G., Yao, L., “Review of Ultrasonic Detecting System for Automatic Guided Vehicle Navigation,” Proceedings of International Conference on Innovation and Development of Urban Agricultural Engineering, Beijing (Sep. 14–16, 2005) pp. 16–22.Google Scholar
53.Sheridan, T., Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues (John Wiley and Sons, UK, 2002).Google Scholar
54.Sanders, D. A., “Perception in robotics,” Ind. Robot 26 (2), 90–92 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55.Sanders, D., “Progress in machine intelligence,” Ind. Robot 35 (6), 485–487 (2008).Google Scholar
56.Sanders, D. A., “System specification. 2,” Microprocess. Microprogr. 38 (1–5), 833 (1993).Google Scholar
57.Sanders, D. A. and Bergasa-Suso, J., “Inferring learning style from the way students interact with a computer user interface and the WWW,” IEEE Trans (E) 53 (4), 613–620 (2010).Google Scholar
58.Sanders, D. A., Lambert, G. and Graham-Jones, J. et al. , “A robotic welding system using image processing techniques and a CAD model to provide information to a multi-intelligent decision module,” Assem. Autom. J. 30 (4), 323–332 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59.Sanders, D. A., “The modification of pre-planned manipulator paths to improve the gross motions associated with the pick and place task,” Robotica 13, 77–85 (1995).Google Scholar
60.Tewkesbury, G. E. and Sanders, D. A., “A new robot command library which includes simulation,” J. Robot. Syst. 26 (1), 39–48 (1999).Google Scholar
61.Tewkesbury, G. E. and Sanders, D. A., “A new simulation based robot command library applied to three robots,” J. Robot. Syst. 16 (8), 461–469 (1999).3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62.Hudson, A. D., Sanders, D. A. and Tewkesbury, G. E. et al. , “Simulation of a high recirculation airlift reactor for steady-state operation,” Water Sci. Technol. 34 (5–6), 59–66 (1996).Google Scholar
63.Sanders, D. A., Cawte, H. and Hudson, A. D., “Modelling of the fluid dynamic processes in a high-recirculation airlift reactor,” Int. J. Energy Res. 25 (6), 487–500 (2001).Google Scholar
64.Sanders, D. A., Harris, P. and Mazharsolook, E., “Image Modeling in Real Time Using Spheres and Simple Polyhedra,” Fourth International Conference in Image Processing and Its Applications, Maastricht, The Netherlands, Vol. 354 (1992) pp 433–436.Google Scholar
65.Sanders, D. A., Hudson, A. D. and Cawte, H. et al. , “Computer modeling of single sludge systems for the computer-aided-design and control of activated sludge processes,” Microprocess. Microprogr. 40 (10–12), 867–870 (1994).Google Scholar
66.Khodadadi, A., Mirabadi, A. and Moshiri, B., “Assessment of particle filter and Kalman filter for estimating velocity using odometery system,” Sensor Rev. J. 30 (3), 204–209 (2010).Google Scholar
67.Sanders, D. A., “Force sensing,” Ind. Robot 34 (4), 268–269 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68.Nowotny, S., Muenster, R. and Scharek, S., et al. , “Integrated laser cell for combined laser cladding and milling,” Assem. Autom. J. 30 (1), 36–38 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69.Bogue, R., “Fifty years of the laser,” Assem. Autom. J. 30 (4), 317–322 (2010).Google Scholar
70.Talu, M. F., Soyguder, S. and Aydogmus, O., “An implementation of a novel vision-based robotic tracking system,” Sensor Rev. J. 30 (3), 225–232 (2010).Google Scholar
71.Kasaei, S. H., Kasaei, S. M. and Kasaei, S. A. et al. , “Modeling and implementation of a fully autonomous soccer robot based on omni-directional vision system,” Ind. Robot 37 (3), 279–286 (2010).Google Scholar
72.Bogue, R., “Three-dimensional measurements: A review of technologies and applications,” Sensor Rev. J. 30 (2), 102–106 (2010).Google Scholar
73.Zhang, T., Zhu, Y. and Song, J., “Real-time motion planning for mobile robots by means of artificial potential field method in unknown environment,” Ind. Robot 37 (4), 384–400 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
74.Wada, T., Hiraoka, S. and Doi, S., “A control method of deceleration assistance system for collision avoidance based on driver's perceptual risk,” Ind. Robot 37 (4), 347–353 (2010).Google Scholar
75.Ndzi, D. L., Stuart, K. and Toautachone, S. et al. , “Wideband sounder for dynamic and static wireless channel characterisation: urban picocell channel model,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. 113, 285–312 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar