Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:52:17.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of coding and classification systems in the design of universal robotic grippers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Jeoung S. Cho ,
Eric M. Malstromt  and
John C. Even Jr.
Jeoung S. Cho
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering, Dongseo University, Pusan 610-010 (Korea)
Eric M. Malstromt
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 (USA)
John C. Even Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010 (USA)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Recent hardware advances for robot accessories include self changing grippers. A universal wrist has the capability of accessing and pneumatically attaching itself to a limited number of grippers that can be stored in a magazine. This paper addresses the determination of self changing gripper characteristics to permit the grasping of a wide variety of geometric shapes with a limited number of different gripper types.

Keywords

Robotic grippersCodingClassificationDesign.
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , July 1993 , pp. 345 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Mutter, R.F., “Robotic Assembly: Major Challenges and Benefits”, Modern Material Handling 38, No. 9, 52–55 (06, 1983)Google Scholar
2.Trivedi, P.B., “Comparative Evaluation of Grouping Methods in Group Technology” Master of Science Thesis (Parks Library, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 1989).Google Scholar
3.Schafer, H.S. and Malstrom, E.M., “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Two Finger, Parallel Jaw Robotic Grippers” Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Industrial Robots/Robots 7, Vol. 2, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Chicago (04, 1983) pp. 18. 112–18.123.Google Scholar
4.Schafer, H.S. and Malstrom, E.M., “Testing the Efficiency and Motion Economy of Two Finger Robotic Grippers” Robotica 1, No. 3, 127–137 (07, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Bracken, F.L., “Part Classification and Gripper Design for Automatic Handling and Assembly” Robot Grippers, edited by Pham, D.T. and Heignbotham, W.B. (Springer- Verlag, Bedford, England, 1986).Google Scholar
6.Burbidge, J.L., Introduction to Croup Technology (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
7.Burbidge, J.L., “A Manual Method of Production Flow Analysis” The Production Engineer 56, No. 10, 34–38 (10, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Opitz, H., A Classification System to Describe Workpieces (Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, 1970).Google Scholar
9.King, J.R., “Machine-Component Grouping in Production Flow Analysis: An Approach Using a Rank Order Clustering Algorithm”, Int. J. Production Research 18, No. 2, 212–232 (1980).Google Scholar
10.King, J.R., “Machine-Component Group Formation in Group Technology: Review and Extension”, Int. J. Production Research 20, No. 2, 117–133 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Sneath, P.H. and Sokal, R.R., Numerical Taxonomy (Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1973).Google Scholar
12.Sokal, R.R. and Sneath, P.H., Principles of Numerical Taxonomy (Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1963).Google Scholar
13.Horowitz, E. and Sahni, S., Fundamentals of Computer Algorithms (Computer Science Press, Rockville, Maryland, 1984).Google Scholar
14.Chen, F.Y., “Force Analysis and Design Considerations of Grippers” The Industrial Robot 9, No. 4, 243–249 (12, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar