Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:02:33.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Novel Cooperative Teleoperation Framework for Nonlinear Time-Delayed Single-Master/Multi-Slave System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2019

Maryam Farahmandrad Open the ORCID record for Maryam Farahmandrad [Opens in a new window] ,
Soheil Ganjefar ,
Heidar Ali Talebi  and
Mahdi Bayati Open the ORCID record for Mahdi Bayati [Opens in a new window]
Maryam Farahmandrad
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Soheil Ganjefar
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
Heidar Ali Talebi
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology. E-mail: [email protected]
Mahdi Bayati*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology. E-mail: [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper proposes a novel control framework for a single-master/multi-slave teleoperation system to grasp and handle an object, considering nonlinearity and uncertainty in the dynamics of the slaves and time-varying delay in the communication channel. Based on passive decomposition approach, the dynamics of the slaves are decomposed into two decoupled systems, and then two higher order sliding mode controllers are designed to control them. Also, a synchronization control methodology for the master is developed. Stability is fully studied using the passivity property and Lyapunov theorem. Finally, simulation and practical results confirm that the control system works well against the conditions.

Keywords

Cooperative robotic systemHigher order sliding mode controlLocked systemShape systemSingle-master/multi-slaveSynchronization controlTeleoperation
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , March 2020 , pp. 475 - 492
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chawda, V. and O’Malley, M. K., “Position synchronization in bilateral teleoperation under time-varying communication delays,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 20(1), 245–253 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, D. A., “Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom. 9(5), 624–637 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, J. T. and Kreutz-Delgado, K., “Motion and force control of multiple robotic manipulators,” Automatica 28(4), 729–743 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinós, R., Terra, M. H. and Ishihara, J. Y., “Motion and force control of cooperative robotic manipulators with passive joints,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 14(4), 725–734 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohajerpoor, R., Rezaei, M., Talebi, A., Noorhosseini, M. and Monfaredi, R., “A robust adaptive hybrid force/position control scheme of two planar manipulators handling an unknown object interacting with an environment,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part I: J. Syst. Control Eng. 226(4), 509–522 (2012).Google Scholar
Schneider, S. A. and Cannon, R. H., “Object impedance control for cooperative manipulation: Theory and experimental results,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom. 8(3), 383–394 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. and Spong, M. W., “Bilateral Teleoperation of Multiple Cooperative Robots Over Delayed Communication Networks: Theory,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2005, ICRA 2005 (IEEE, 2005) pp. 360–365.Google Scholar
Kawasaki, H., Ueki, S. and Ito, S., “Decentralized adaptive coordinated control of multiple robot arms without using a force sensor,” Automatica 42(3), 481–488 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y.-H. and Arimoto, S., “Decentralized adaptive and nonadaptive position/force controllers for redundant manipulators in cooperations,” Int. J. Rob. Res. 17(3), 232–247 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D., Martinez-Palafox, O. and Spong, M. W., “Bilateral Teleoperation of Multiple Cooperative Robots Over Delayed Communication Networks: Application,” Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2005, ICRA 2005 (IEEE, 2005) pp. 366–371.Google Scholar
Monfaredi, R., Rezaei, S. M. and Talebi, H. A., “A Cooperative Robotic System for Handling a Geometrically Unknown Object for Non-rigid Contact Without Force Sensors,” 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) (IEEE, 2011) pp. 240–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bistooni, M. and Monfaredi, R., “Cooperative robotic system control scheme for 6DOF spatial handling of a geometrically unknown object,” Trans. Control Mech. Syst. 3(2), 93–99 (2014).Google Scholar
Lee, D. and Lui, K. Y., “Passive configuration decomposition and passivity-based control of nonholonomic mechanical systems,” IEEE Trans. Rob. 33(2), 281–297 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, M. and Lee, D., “Improving transparency of virtual coupling for haptic interaction with human force observer,” Robotica 35(2), 354–369 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lui, K. Y., Cho, H., Ha, C. and Lee, D., “First-person view semi-autonomous teleoperation of cooperative wheeled mobile robots with visuo-haptic feedback,” Int. J. Rob. Res. 36(5–7), 840–860 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohajerpoor, R., Sharifi, I., Talebi, H. A. and Rezaei, S. M., “Adaptive Bilateral Teleoperation of an Unknown Object Handled by Multiple Robots Under Unknown Communication Delay,” IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), 2013 (IEEE, 2013) pp. 1158–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z. and Su, C.-Y., “Neural-adaptive control of single-master multiple-slaves teleoperation for coordinated multiple mobile manipulators with time-varying communication delays and input uncertainties,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 24(9), 1400–1413 (2013).Google ScholarPubMed
Yan, J., Yang, X., Chen, C., Luo, X. and Guan, X., “Bilateral teleoperation of multiple agents with formation control,” IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 1(2), 141–148 (2014).Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Seda, E. J., Troy, J. J., Erignac, C. A., Murray, P., Stipanovic, D. M. and Spong, M. W., “Bilateral teleoperation of multiple mobile agents: Coordinated motion and collision avoidance,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 18(4), 984–992 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Song, G., Wei, Z., Sun, H. and Zhang, Y., “Bilateral teleoperation of a group of mobile robots for cooperative tasks,” Intell. Serv. Rob. 9(4), 311–321 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pliego-Jiménez, J. and Arteaga-Pérez, M., “Telemanipulation of cooperative robots: A case of study,” Int. J. Control. 91(6), 1–16 (2017).Google Scholar
Asad, M. U., Farooq, U., Gu, J., Liu, R., Balas, V. E. and Marius, B., “State Convergence Based Design of a Single-Master-Multi-slave Nonlinear Teleoperation System,” 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA) (IEEE, 2018) pp. 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X., Hua, C.-C., Yan, J. and Guan, X.-P., “Adaptive formation control of cooperative teleoperators with intermittent communications,” IEEE Trans. Cybern. 99, 1–10 (2018).Google Scholar
Nuño, E., Ortega, R. and Basañez, L., “An adaptive controller for nonlinear teleoperators,” Automatica 46(1), 155–159 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartoszewicz, A. and Patton, R. J., “Sliding mode control,” Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 21(8–9), 635–637 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spong, M. W., Hutchinson, S. and Vidyasagar, M., Robot Modeling and Control, vol. 3 (Wiley, New York, 2006).Google Scholar
Hatanaka, T., Chopra, N., Fujita, M. and Spong, M. W., Passivity-Based Control and Estimation in Networked Robotics (Springer, Switzerland, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D., “Passive Decomposition and Control of Interactive Mechanical Systems Under Motion Coordination Requirements,” Ph.D. Dissertation (University of Minnesota, 2004).Google Scholar
Bartolini, G., Ferrara, A., Usai, E. and Utkin, V. I., “On multi-input chattering-free second-order sliding mode control,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 45(9), 1711–1717 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuhua, X., Chongwei, Z., Wei, B. and Lin, T., “Dynamic Sliding Mode Controller Based on Particle Swarm Optimization for Mobile Robot’s Path Following,” International Forum on Information Technology and Applications, IFITA 2009, vol. 1 (IEEE, 2009) pp. 257–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganjefar, S., Janabi-Sharifi, F., Hosseinipanah, S. and Sharifi, R., “Prediction of Delay Time in Internet by Neural Network,” Proceedings of 2005 IEEE Conference on Control Applications, CCA 2005 (IEEE, 2005) pp. 340–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar