Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:16:23.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinematic analysis of a single-loop reconfigurable 7R mechanism with multiple operation modes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2014

Xiuyun He ,
Xianwen Kong ,
Damien Chablat ,
Stéphane Caro  and
Guangbo Hao
Xiuyun He
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
Xianwen Kong*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
Damien Chablat
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherche en Communications et en Cybernétique de Nantes (IRCCyN), Université Nantes Angers Le Mans, Nantes, France
Stéphane Caro
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherche en Communications et en Cybernétique de Nantes (IRCCyN), Université Nantes Angers Le Mans, Nantes, France
Guangbo Hao
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper presents a novel one-degree-of-freedom (1-DOF) single-loop reconfigurable 7R mechanism with multiple operation modes (SLR7RMMOM), composed of seven revolute (R) joints, via adding a revolute joint to the overconstrained Sarrus linkage. The SLR7RMMOM can switch from one operation mode to another without disconnection and reassembly, and is a non-overconstrained mechanism. The algorithm for the inverse kinematics of the serial 6R mechanism using kinematic mapping is adopted to deal with the kinematic analysis of the SLR7RMMOM. First, a numerical method is applied and an example is given to show that there are 13 sets of solutions for the SLR7RMMOM, corresponding to each input angle. Among these solutions, nine sets are real solutions, which are verified using both a computer-aided design (CAD) model and a prototype of the mechanism. Then an algebraic approach is also used to analyse the mechanism and same results are obtained as the numerical one. It is shown from both numerical and algebraic approaches that the SLR7RMMOM has three operation modes: a translational mode and two 1-DOF planar modes. The transitional configurations among the three modes are also identified.

Keywords

Single-loop reconfigurable mechanismMultiple operation modesKinematic analysisNumerical methodAlgebraic approachTransitional configuration
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 32 , Issue 7 , October 2014 , pp. 1171 - 1188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Yang, G., Chen, I., Lim, K. M. and Huat, Y. S., “Design and Kinematic Analysis of Modular Reconfigurable Parallel Robots,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, MI, USA (May 1999) pp. 2501–2506.Google Scholar
2.Yang, G., Chen, I.-M., Lim, W. K. and Yeo, S. H., “Kinematic design of modular reconfigurable in-parallel robots,” Auton. Robots 10 (1), 83–89 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Kuo, C. and Dai, J., “Reconfiguration Principles and Strategies for Reconfigurable Mechanisms,” ASME/IFToMM International Conference on Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots, London, UK (Jun. 2009).Google Scholar
4.Galletti, C. and Fanghella, P., “Single-loop kinematotropic mechanism,” Mech. Mach. Theory 36 (6), 743–761 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Rakotomanga, N., Chablat, D. and Caro, S., “Kinatostatic Performance of a Planar Mechanism with Variable Actuation,” In: Advances in Robot Kinematics: Analysis and Design (Springer, Netherlands, 2008) pp. 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kong, X. and Huang, C., “Type Synthesis of Single-DOF Single-Loop Mechanisms with Two Operation Modes,” ASME/IFToMM International Conference on Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots, London, UK (Jun. 2009).Google Scholar
7.Huang, C., Tseng, R. and Kong, X., “Design and Kinematic Analysis of a Multiple-Mode 5R2P Closed-Loop Linkage,” In: New Trends in Mechanism Science: Analysis and Design (Springer, Netherlands, 2010) pp. 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kong, X., “Type synthesis of 3-DOF parallel manipulators with both a planar operation mode and a spatial translational operation mode,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 5 (4), 041015 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Zlatanov, D., Bonev, I. A. and Gosselin, C. M., “Constraint Singularity as C-space Singularities,” In: Advances in Robot Kinematics-Theory and Application (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 2002) pp. 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kong, X. and Gosselin, C. M., Type Synthesis of Parallel Mechanisms (Springer, Netherlands, 2007).Google Scholar
11.Wang, X., Hao, M. and Cheng, Y., “On the use of differential evolution for forward kinematics of parallel manipulators,” Appl. Math. Comput. 205 (2), 760–769 (Nov. 2008).Google Scholar
12.Bonev, I. A., Zlatanov, D. and Gosselin, C. M., “Singularity analysis of 3-DOF planar parallel mechanisms via screw theory,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 125 (3), 573–581 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Husty, M. L., Pfurner, M. and Schrocker, H. P., “A new and effective algorithm for the inverse kinematics of a general serial 6R manipulator,” Mech. Mach. Theory 42 (1), 66–81 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Husty, M. L., Pfurner, M., Schrocker, H. P. and Brunnthaler, K., “Algebraic method in mechanism analysis and synthesis,” Robotica 25 (6), 661–675 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Pfurner, M., Analysis of Spatial Serial Manipulators Using Kinematic Mapping, PhD Thesis (University of Innsbruck, Austria, 2006).Google Scholar
16.Pfurner, M., Kong, X., and Huang, C., “Algebraic Analysis of a Multiple-Mode 5R2P Closed-Loop Linkage,” Proceedings of International Line Geometry & Kinematics, Paphos, Cyprus (Apr. 2011).Google Scholar
17.Pfurner, M., “Multiple-Mode Closed 7-Link Chains Based on Overconstrained 4-Link Mechanisms,” In: New Trends in Mechanism and Machine Science (Springer, Netherlands, 2007) pp. 73–81.Google Scholar